2004
Volume 56, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 1876-9071
  • E-ISSN: 2214-5729

Abstract

Abstract

In 1996, Monika Fludernik published the book in which she introduces a new narratological model. The ‘natural narratology’ mainly deals with the way people process narratives on a cognitive level. According to Fludernik, the cognitive frames by which human beings impose narrativity on certain types of discourse, are grounded in real-life, i.e. ‘natural’, experiences. Such an assumption has contributed to the creation of the ‘unnatural narratology’, a narratological model that focuses on the ‘unnaturalness’ of many narratives. The previously mentioned narratological models may be useful while discussing strange elements in narrative texts. In addition, the ‘natural narratology’ also offers an explanation of how readers could make those elements seem ‘natural’ again.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/IN2018.2.003.VAN
2018-06-01
2021-06-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/18769071/56/2/03_IN2018.2_VAN.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5117/IN2018.2.003.VAN&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Alber, J., e.a., ‘Unnatural Narratives, Unnatural Narratology. Beyond Mimetic Models’. Narrative18, (2) 2010, pp. 113–136.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Alber, J., e.a., ‘What Is Unnatural about Unnatural Narratology? A Response to Monika Fludernik’. Narrative20, (3) 2012, pp. 371–382.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bernaerts, L., ‘Cognitieve literatuurwetenschap’. Bernaerts, L. & J.Pieters (red.), Cahier voor Literatuurwetenschap 3. Hermeneutiek in veelvoud. Gent, 2011, pp. 153–158.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bernaerts, L. & B.Vervaeck, ‘“Wie is toch deze verrassende Krijgelmans?” Ivo Michiels, C.C. Krijgelmans en het Vlaamse romanexperiment’. Tijdschrift voor Nederlandse Taal- en Letterkunde127, (2) 2011, pp. 164–188.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Brooks, P., Reading for the Plot. Design and Intention in Narrative. Oxford, 1984.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Buuren, M. van, De boekenpoeper. Assen, 1982.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Culler, J., Structuralist Poetics. Structuralism, linguistics and the study of literature. Londen, 1975 (2002).
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Dressler, W.U., Morphonology. The dynamics of derivation. Ann Arbor, 1985.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Dressler, W.U., e.a., Leitmotifs in Natural Morphology. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, 1987.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Eichenbaum, B., ‘The structure of Gogol’s “The Overcoat”’. Russian Review22, (4) 1963, pp. 377–399.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Fludernik, M., Towards a ‘Natural’ Narratology. Londen, 1996.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Fludernik, M., ‘How Natural Is “Unnatural Narratology”; or, What Is Unnatural about Unnatural Narratology?’. Narrative20, (3) 2012, pp. 357–370.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Herman, L. & B.Vervaeck, Vertelduivels. Handboek verhaalanalyse. Nijmegen, 2001 (2009).
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Jauss, H.R., Literaturgeschichte als Provokation. Frankfurt, 1970.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Krijgelmans, C.C., Homunculi. Amsterdam, 1967.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Krijgelmans, C.C., De Hunnen. Aalst, 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Labov, W., Language in the Inner City. Studies in the Black English Vernacular. Philadelphia, 1972.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Nünning, A., ‘Informationsübertragung oder Informationskonstruktion? Grundzüge und Konsequenzen eines konstruktivistischen Modells von Kommunikation’. Humankybernetik30, (4) 1989, pp. 127–140.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Perttula, I., ‘The Grotesque. Concepts and Characteristics’. Salmela, M. & J.Toikkanen (red.), The Grotesque and the Unnatural. New York, 2012, pp. 17–42.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Richardson, B., ‘What Is Unnatural Narrative Theory?’. Alber, J. & R.Heinze (red.), Unnatural Narratives. Unnatural Narratology. Berlin, 2011, pp. 23–40.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Vervaeck, B., ‘Genre in verandering. Vernieuwingen in de naoorlogse Nederlandstalige roman’. Spiegel der Letteren56, (1) 2014, pp. 51–83.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Vervaeck, B., ‘Een greep op het ongrijpbare? De studie van onnatuurlijke verhalen’. Internationale Neerlandistiek53, (3) 2015, pp. 245–254.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Yacobi, T., ‘Fictional Reliability as a Communicative Problem’. Poetics Today2, (2) 1981, pp. 113–126.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/IN2018.2.003.VAN
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): C.C. Krijgelmans; De goede herder; natural narratology; unnatural narratology
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error