Leven als vertelling. Het gebruik van literaire motieven in de biologie en de levenswetenschappen

References

1. Berezin, A., Isotopic randomness and self-organization: in physics, biology, nanotechnology, and digital informatics. Berlijn, De Gruyter, 2018.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bergmann, C., Über die Verhältnisse der Wärmeökonomie der Thiere zu ihrer Grösse. Göttingen. Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht, 1848.
   [Google Scholar]
3. BlackM., Models and metaphors. Studies in language and philosophy. Ithaca, Cornell University Press, 1962.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Boudry, M., & Pigliucci, M., ‘The mismeasure of machine: Synthetic biology and the trouble with engineering metaphors’, in: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences44(4), 2013, 660-668.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Burger, D., Sphereland: A fantasy about curved spaces and an expanded universe. New York City, Harper and Collins, 1965.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Carlip, S., ‘Quantum gravity in flatland’, in: Scientific American306(4), 2012, 40-47.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Davies, S., ‘Why art is not a spandrel’, in: The British Journal of Aesthetics50(4), 2010, 333-341.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Dawkins, R., The selfish gene. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1976.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Dawkins, R., The blind watchmaker: Why the evidence of evolution reveals a universe without design. New York City, WW Norton & Company, 1986.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Dawkins, R., Climbing mount improbable. New York City, WW Norton & Company, 1996.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Gould, G. C., & MacFadden, B. J., ‘Gigantism, dwarfism, and Cope’s rule: “nothing in evolution makes sense without a phylogeny”’, in: Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History285, 2004, 219-237.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Gould, S.J. & Lewontin, R.C., ‘The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme’, in: Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B205, 1979, 581-598.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Grillo, C. A., Holford, M. & Walter, N. G., ‘From Flatland to Jupiter: Searching for rules of interaction across biological scales’, in: Integrative and Comparative Biology61(6), 2021, 2048-2052.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Haeckel, E., Kunstformen der Natur. Leipzig, Bibliographisches Institut. 1904.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Haldane, J.B.S., ‘On being the right size’, in: Harper’s Magazine152(3), 1926, 424–427.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Haldane, J. B. S., Possible worlds and other essays. London, Chatto and Windus, 1927.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N., & Fitch, W. T., ‘The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?’, in: Science, 298(5598), 2002, 1569-1579.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Hesse, M., Models and Analogies in Science. Notre Dame, University of Notre Dame Press, 1963.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Hordijk, W., ‘Evolution: limited and predictable or unbounded and lawless?’, in: Biological Theory11(4), 2016, 187-191.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Ibn-Ḫallikān, A. I. M., & de Slane, W. M., Kitāb Wafayāt Al-aʻyān: Ibn Khallikan’s Biographical Dictionary. London, Oriental Translation Fund, 1843.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Jablonski, D., ‘Keeping time with mass extinctions’, in: Paleobiology10(2), 1984, 139-145.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Kauffman, S. A., A world beyond physics: the emergence and evolution of life. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Keller, E. F., Making sense of life: Explaining biological development with models, metaphors, and machines. Cambridge (Massachusetts), Harvard University Press, 2002.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Kjeldsen, T. H., ‘A multiple perspective approach to history of mathematics: Mathematical programming and Rashevsky’s early development of mathematical biology in the twentieth century’, in: Schubring, G. (ed.), Interfaces between mathematical practices and mathematical education. Dordrecht, Springer, 2019, 143-167.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Kuhn, T. S., ‘Metaphor in science’, in: Ortony, A. (ed.), Metaphor and thought. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1979, 533-542.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Labinger, J. A., & Collins, H. (ed.), The one culture?: a conversation about science. Chiccago, University of Chicago Press, 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Labinger, J. A., Connecting Literature and Science. London, Routledge, 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Lancor, R., ‘Using metaphor theory to examine conceptions of energy in biology, chemistry, and physics’, in: Science & Education23(6), 2014, 1245-1267.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Dive, L. L., & Irvine, A., ‘Hopping through the Mathiverse’, in: Nature411, 2001, 140-141.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Law, R. & Lewis, D. H., ‘King Midas and the Red Queen’, in: Nature314, 1985, 500-501.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Lovelock, J. E., ‘Gaia as seen through the atmosphere’, in: Atmospheric Environment6(8), 1972, 579-580.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Mecke, K., ‘Narratives in Physics Quantitative Metaphors and formula∈ Tropes?’, in: Blume, H., Leitgeb, C. en Rössner, M. (ed)., Narrated Communities–Narrated Realities. Leiden, Brill, 2015, 29-49.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Mert, A., & Hine, D., On Being the Right Size. Size, ‘Democracy and Scale in the Anthropocene’, in: GabrieleDürbeck, PhilipHüpkes (ed.), Narratives of Scale in the Anthropocene: Imagining Human Responsibility in an Age of Scalar Complexity. London, Routledge, 2021, 161-176.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Muraille, E., ‘Diversity generator mechanisms are essential components of biological systems: The two queen hypothesis’, in: Frontiers in microbiology9, 2018, 1-16.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Pauly, D., On the sex of fish and the gender of scientists: a collection of essays in fisheries science. Dordrecht, Springer, 1994.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Pauly, D., ‘The gill-oxygen limitation theory (GOLT) and its critics’, in: Science Advances7(2), 2021, eabc6050.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Pauly, D., Chu, E. & Müller, J., ‘Brobdingnagians and Goliaths: two forms of gigantism in fish’, in: Journal of Fish Biology104(6), 2024, 1709.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Peñaloza, G. & Robles-Piñeros, J., ‘Imagination and narratives to tell stories about natural history’, in: Human Arenas4(4), 2021, 563-576.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Reed, M. C., ‘Why is mathematical biology so hard?’, in: Notices of the AMS51(3), 2004, 338-342.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Reynolds, A. S., Understanding metaphors in the life sciences. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Richards, R. J., ‘The structure of narrative explanation in history and biology’, in: History and Evolution, 1992, 19-53.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Robinson, Z., Maley, C. J. & Piccinini, G., ‘Is consciousness a spandrel?’, in: Journal of the American Philosophical Association1(2), 2015, 365-383.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Sagan, C., Billions & billions: Thoughts on life and death at the brink of the millennium. New York, Ballantine books, 1997.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Somero, G. N., ‘The Goldilocks Principle: A unifying perspective on biochemical adaptation to abiotic stressors in the sea’, in: Annual Review of Marine Science14(1), 2022, 1-23.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Stebbing, T., A cybernetic view of biological growth: the Maia hypothesis. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2011.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Stewart, I., Flatterland: Like Flatland only more so. New York, Hachette, 2008.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Strotz, L. C., Simoes, M., Girard, M. G., Breitkreuz, L., Kimmig, J., & Lieberman, B. S., ‘Getting somewhere with the Red Queen: chasing a biologically modern definition of the hypothesis’, in: Biology Letters14(5), 2018, 20170734.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Sullivan-Clarke, A., ‘Misled by metaphor: The problem of ingrained analogy’, in: Perspectives on Science27(2), 2019, 153-170.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Teicher, A., ‘Mendel’s use of mathematical modelling: ratios, predictions and the appeal to tradition’, in: History and philosophy of the life sciences, 36(2), 2014, 187-208.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Throesch, E. L., Before Einstein: the fourth dimension in fin-de-siècle literature and culture. Vol. 1. London, Anthem Press, 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Turvey, M. T., Lectures on perception: An ecological perspective, London, Routledge, 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Van Valen, L., ‘A new evolutionary law’, in: Evolutionary Theory1, 1973, 1-30.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Voltaire, Candide of het optimism. Vert. M.J.Premsela. Amsterdam, Arbeiderspers, 1956 (orig. 1759).
    [Google Scholar]
54. Walsh, B., ‘Escape from flatland’, in: Journal of Evolutionary Biology20(1), 2007, 36-38.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Ward, P., The medea hypothesis: is life on earth ultimately self-destructive?Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2009.
    [Google Scholar]
56. West, G., Scale: The universal laws of life, growth, and death in organisms, cities, and companies. New York City, Penguin, 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Yates, F. E., ‘Evolutionary computing by dynamics in living organisms’, in: Advances in Cognitive Science, 2019, 26-49.
    [Google Scholar]