Boekbesprekingen | Amsterdam University Press Journals Online
Volume 24, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 1384-5845
  • E-ISSN: 2352-1171
Preview this article:

There is no abstract available.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...



  1. Ćurčić, M., S.Andringa & F.Kuiken(2019). The role of awareness and cognitive aptitudes in L2 predictive language processing. Language Learning69. <doi: 10.1111/lang.12321>.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Gussenhoven, Carlos(2000). The lexical tone contrast of Roermond Dutch in Optimality Theory. In: MerleHorne (ed.), Prosody: Theory and Experiment. Amsterdam: Kluwer, 129-167.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Hermans, Ben(2012). The phonological representation of the Limburgian tonal accents. In: BertBotma & RolandNoske (eds.), Phonological Explorations: Empirical, Theoretical and Diachronic Issues. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 227-244.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Kehrein, Wolfgang(2018). There’s no tone in Cologne: against tone segment interactions in Franconian. In: WolfgangKehrein, BjörnKöhnlein, PaulBoersma & Marcvan Oostendorp (eds.), Segmental structure and tone. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 147-194.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Köhnlein, Björn(2011). Rule reversal revisited: Synchrony and diachrony of tone and prosodic structure in the Franconian dialect of Arzbach. Utrecht: LOT. Dissertation Series 274.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Köhnlein, Björn(2016). Contrastive foot structure in Franconian tone accent dialects. Phonology33 (1), 87-123.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Peters, Jörg(2006). The Cologne word accent revisited. In: Michielde Vaan (ed.), Germanic Tone Accents. Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Franconian Tone Accents, Leiden, 13-14 June 2003. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik – Beiheft 131. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 107-133.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Ramachers, Stefanie, SusanneBrouwer & PaulaFikkert (2017a). No perceptual reorganization for Limburgian tones? A cross-linguistic investigation with 6- to 12-month-old infants. Journal of Child Language45 (2), 290-318.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Ramachers, Stefanie, SusanneBrouwer & PaulaFikkert (2017b). How native prosody affects pitch processing during word learning in Limburgian and Dutch toddlers and adults. Frontiers in Psychology8.1652.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Ramachers, Stefanie, SusanneBrouwer & PaulaFikkert (in prep.). Distinct functions lead to distinct processing. Native and non-native perception of Limburgian lexical tones.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Schmidt, Jürgen E.(1986). Die Mittelfränkischen Tonakzente (Rheinische Akzentuierung). Mainzer Studien zur Sprach- und Volksforschung 8. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Werth, Alexander(2011). Perzeptionsphonologische Grundlagen der Prosodie Eine Analyse der mittelfränkischen Tonakzentdistinktion. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik, Beiheft 143. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Book Review
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error