2004
Volume 25, Issue 2-3
  • ISSN: 1384-5845
  • E-ISSN: 2352-1171

Abstract

Abstract

This article presents an update of Coussé & Oosterhof (2012), which studies a small group of past participles in Dutch used with an imperative meaning. We revisit in particular the need for abstraction in the constructional schemas developed in the original study. Our analysis explores the role of prototypes and exemplars as an alternative to traditional abstractions in the open slots of constructional schemas.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/NEDTAA2020.2-3.017.COUS
2020-10-01
2021-12-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Booij, Geert(2010). Construction morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  2. Bybee, Joan & DavidEddington(2006). A usage-based approach to Spanish verbs of ‘becoming’. Language82, 323-355.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bybee, Joan(2010). Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  4. Coussé, Evie & AlbertOosterhof(2012). Het imperativische participium in het Nederlands. Vorm, betekenis en gebruik. Nederlandse Taalkunde17, 26-55.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Coussé, Evie(2018). Grammaticalization, host-class expansion and category change. In: Van GoethemKristelet al. (red.), Category change from a constructional perspective. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 93-117.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Karsdorp, Folgert & MatthiasHüning (2012.) De relatie tussen schema’s en analogische verbindingen. Nederlandse Taalkunde17, 261-267.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Kemmer, Suzanne & MichaelBarlow(2000). Introduction. A usage-based conception of language. In: BarlowMichael & KemmerSuzanne (red.), Usage-based models of language. Stanford: CSLI, i-xxvii.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Langacker, Ronald(1987). Foundations of grammar. Volume 1. Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  9. Oostdijk, Nelleke, MartinReynaert, VéroniqueHoste & InekeSchuurman(2013). The construction of a 500-million-word reference corpus of contemporary written Dutch. In: SpynsPeter & OdijkJan (red.), Essential speech and language technology for Dutch: Results by the STEVIN-programme. Heidelberg: Spriner, 219-247.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Rosch, Eleanor(1975). Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology104, 573-605.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Verhagen, Arie(2005). Constructiegrammatica en ‘usage based’ taalkunde. Nederlandse Taalkunde10, 197-222.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/NEDTAA2020.2-3.017.COUS
Loading
/content/journals/10.5117/NEDTAA2020.2-3.017.COUS
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): construction morphology; exemplar; imperative; prototype; usage-based grammar
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error