2004
Volume 25, Issue 2-3
  • ISSN: 1384-5845
  • E-ISSN: 2352-1171

Abstract

Abstract

Schermer-Vermeer (2001Verhagen (2003a)

This article looks back on the articles by Schermer-Vermeer (2001) and Verhagen (2003a), on the double object construction and a Dutch equivalent of the English ‘way’-construction, respectively, which can be considered the first two articles to have appeared in that address problems of Dutch grammar from an explicitly constructionist perspective. I illustrate how, on the basis of data from a large web corpus such as NLCOW14, the formal and semantic analyses offered in the two articles can be refined in a number of ways, but I also show that they include hypotheses and ideas that are still most relevant and relate to topical discussions in construction grammar.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/NEDTAA2020.2-3.016.COLL
2020-10-01
2021-10-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Colleman, Timothy(2005). Jan gooit Piet de bal: een regionale constructie? In: HilligsmannPhilippe, JanssensGuy & VromansJef (red.), Woord voor woord, Zin voor zin. Liber Amicorum voor Siegfried Theissen. Gent: KANTL, 35-47.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Colleman, Timothy(2018). Distributional assimilation in constructional semantics. On contact-related semantic shifts in Afrikaans three-argument constructions. In: BoasHans C. & HöderSteffen (red.), Constructions in Contact: Constructional perspectives on contact phenomena in Germanic languages. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 143-177.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Colleman, Timothy & FreekVan de Velde(2015). Variatie en verandering in constructies: Op het snijvlak van de constructiegrammatica en de variatielinguïstiek. Taal en Tongval67, 135-148.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Diessel, Holger(2015). Usage-based Construction Grammar. In: DąbrowskaEwa & DivjakDagmar (red.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 295-321.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Fillmore, Charles J.(1988). The mechanisms of ‘Construction Grammar’. Proceedings from the annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society14, 35-55.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Fillmore, Charles J., PaulKay & MaryO’Connor(1988). Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone. Language64, 501-538.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Geeraerts, Dirk.(1995). Diachronic Prototype Semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  8. Goldberg, Adele E.(1992). The inherent semantics of argument structure: The case of the English ditransitive construction. Cognitive Linguistics3, 37-74.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Goldberg, Adele E.(1995). Constructions: A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  10. Hilpert, Martin(2018). Three open questions in Diachronic Construction Grammar. In: CousséEvie, AnderssonPeter & OlofssonJoel (red.), Grammaticalization meets Construction Grammar. Amsterdam: Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 21-39.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Jackendoff, Ray(1990). Semantic structures. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
  12. Pinker, Steven(1989). Learnability and Cognition: The Acquisition of Argument Structure. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.
  13. Schäfer, Roland(2015). Processing and Querying Large Web Corpora with the COW14 Architecture. In: Proceedings of Challenges in the Management of Large Corpora (CMLC-3), 28-34.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Schäfer, Roland & FelixBildhauer(2012). Building Large Corpora from the Web Using a New Efficient Tool Chain. In: Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’12), 486-493.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Schermer-Vermeer, Ina C.(1996). De beschrijving van de possessieve datief. Nederlandse Taalkunde1, 265-279.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Schermer-Vermeer, Ina C.(2001). Grammatica, lexicon en de dubbelobject-constructie in het Nederlands en het Engels. Nederlandse Taalkunde6, 22-37.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Schilperoord, Joost & ArieVerhagen(1997). Functionele elementen in een cognitief perspectief: Evidentie uit taalproductie. Nederlandse Taalkunde2, 223-247.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Sommerer, Lotte & ElenaSmirnova (red.) (ter perse). Nodes and links in the network: Advances in Diachronic Construction Grammar. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  19. Traugott, Elisabeth Closs(2018). Modeling Language Change with Constructional Networks. In: BorderíaSalvador Pons & LamasÓscar Loureda (red.), Beyond grammaticalization and discourse markers, 17-50. Leiden: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Van der Leek, Frederike(1995). Alternantie: grammatica of cognitie?Forum der Letteren36, 81-97.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Van de Velde, Freek(2014). Degeneracy: The Maintenance of Constructional Networks.” In: BoogaartRonny, CollemanTimothy & RuttenGijsbert (red.), Extending the Scope of Construction Grammar, 141-179. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Verhagen, Arie(2002). From parts to wholes and back again. Cognitive Linguistics13, 403-439.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Verhagen, Arie (2003a). Hoe het Nederlands zich een eigen weg baant. Vergelijkende en historische observaties vanuit een constructie-perspectief. Nederlandse Taalkunde8, 328-346.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Verhagen, Arie (2003b). The Dutch way. In: VerhagenArie & WeijerJeroen van de (red.), Usage-based approaches to Dutch. Utrecht: LOT, 27-57.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Verherbruggen, Astrid (2018-2019). Alse de mensce gewont es: Wondverzorging in zes Middelnederlandse chirurgische traktaten van de 14de tot de 16de eeuw. Masterproef Universiteit Gent.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Zehentner, Eva(2019). Competition in language change: The rise of the English dative alternation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/NEDTAA2020.2-3.016.COLL
Loading
/content/journals/10.5117/NEDTAA2020.2-3.016.COLL
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error