Probing early lexical and morphological processing in Dutch with the MMN response

References

1. Alegre, M. & P.Gordon (1999). Frequency effects and the representational status of regular inflections. Journal of memory and language40(1), 41–61.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Alexandrov, A.A., D.O.Boricheva, F.Pulvermüller & Y.Shtyrov (2011). Strength of word-specific neural memory traces assessed electrophysiologically. PLoS one6(8), e22999.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Baayen, R.H., T.Dijkstra & R.Schreuder (1997). Singulars and plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a parallel dual-route model. Journal of Memory and Language37(1), 94–117.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Baayen, R.H., P.Milin, D.F.Ðurđević, P.Hendrix & M.Marelli (2011). An amorphous model for morphological processing in visual comprehension based on naive discriminative learning. Psychological Review118(3), 438-481.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Badecker, W. & A.Caramazza (1989). A lexical distinction between inflection and derivation. Linguistic Inquiry20(1), 108–116.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Baguley, T (2012). Serious stats: A guide to advanced statistics for the behavioral sciences. Hampshire, NJ: Palgrave Macmillan.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bakker, I., L.J.MacGregor, F.Pulvermüller & Y.Shtyrov (2013). Past tense in the brain’s time: Neurophysiological evidence for dual-route processing of past-tense verbs. Neuroimage71, 187–195.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Barr, D.J., R.Levy, C.Scheepers & H.J.Tily (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language68(3), 255–278.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Bertram, R., R.Schreuder & R.H.Baayen (2000). The balance of storage and computation in morphological processing: The role of word formation type, affixal homonymy, and productivity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition26(2): 489–511.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Bod, R., J.Hay & S.Jannedy (2003). Probabilistic Linguistics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. BoersmaP. & D.Weenink (2001). Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer. <http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/praat/>
    [Google Scholar]
12. Bozic, M. & W.Marslen-Wilson (2010). Neurocognitive contexts for morphological complexity: Dissociating inflection and derivation. Language and Linguistics Compass4(11), 1063–1073.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Bybee, J. (1995). Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes10(5), 425–455.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Cappelle, B., Y.Shtyrov & F.Pulvermüller (2010). Heating up or cooling up the brain? MEG evidence that phrasal verbs are lexical units. Brain and Language115(3), 189-201.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Clahsen, H. (1999). Lexical entries and rules of language: A multidisciplinary study of German inflection. Behavioral and brain sciences22 (6), 991–1013.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Clahsen, H. & K.Neubauer (2010). Morphology, frequency, and the processing of derived words in native and non-native speakers, Lingua120 (11), 2627–2637.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Diependaele, K., J.A.Duñabeitia, J.Morris & E.Keuleers (2011). Fast morphological effects in first and second language word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language64(4), 344–358.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Embick, D. & R.Noyer (2007). Distributed morphology and the syntax/morphology interface. In: G.Ramchand & C.Reiss (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 289-324.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Ernestus, M. & H.Baayen (2001). Choosing between the Dutch past-tense suffixes -te and -de. In: T.van der Wouden & H.de Hoop (eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands 2001. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 77–88.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Ernestus, M. & R.H.Baayen (2004). Analogical effects in regular past tense production in Dutch. Linguistics, 873–904.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Forster, K.I. (1999). The microgenesis of priming effects in lexical access. Brain and language68(1), 5–15.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Fruchter, J., & A.Marantz (2015). Decomposition, lookup, and recombination: MEG evidence for the full decomposition model of complex visual word recognition. Brain and Language143, 81–96.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Hanna, J., S.Mejias, M.-A.Schelstraete, F.Pulvermüller, Y.Shtyrov & H.K.van der Lely (2014). Early activation of Broca’s area in grammar processing as revealed by the syntactic mismatch negativity and distributed source analysis. Cognitive Neuroscience5(2), 66–76.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Hanna, J. & F.Pulvermüller (2014). Neurophysiological evidence for whole form retrieval of complex derived words: a mismatch negativity study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience8, 53–65.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Hanna, J., B.Cappelle & F.Pulvermüller (2017). Spread the word: MMN brain response reveals whole-form access of discontinuous particle verbs. Brain and Language175, 86–98.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Jong, N.H. de, R.Schreuder & R.H.Baayen (2000). The morphological family size effect and morphology. Language and Cognitive Processes15(4-5), 329–365.
    [Google Scholar]
27. KuznetsovaA., P.B.Brockhoff & R.H.B.Christensen (2017). lmerTest Package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software82(13), 1–26.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Langacker, R. (2017). Entrenchment in Cognitive Grammar. In: H.-J.Schmid (ed.), Entrenchment and the psychology of language learning: How we reorganize and adapt linguistic knowledge. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 39–56.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Leminen, A., M.Leminen, T.Kujala & Y.Shtyrov (2013). Neural dynamics of inflectional and derivational morphology processing in the human brain. Cortex49(10), 2758–2771.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Lignos, C. & K.Gorman (2012). Revisiting frequency and storage in morphological processing. Proceedings from the Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society48, 447–461.
    [Google Scholar]
31. MacGregor, L.J. & Y.Shtyrov (2013). Multiple routes for compound word processing in the brain: evidence from EEG. Brain and language126 (2), 217–229.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Marantz, A. (2013). No escape from morphemes in morphological processing. Language and Cognitive Processes28(7), 905–916.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Marslen-Wilson, W.D., M.Ford, L.Older & X.Zhou (1996). The combinatorial lexicon: Priming derivational affixes. In: G.W.Cottrell (ed.), Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. New York: Routledge, 223-227.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Marslen-Wilson, W.D. & L.K.Tyler (2007). Morphology, language and the brain: the decompositional substrate for language comprehension. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences362(1481), 823–836.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Marslen-Wilson, W.D. & L.K.Tyler (2008). Morphology, language and the brain: The decompositional substrate for language comprehension. In: J.Driver, P.Haggard & T.Shallice (eds.), Mental processes in the human brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 99–121.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Morris, J. & L.Stockall (2012). Early, equivalent ERP masked priming effects for regular and irregular morphology. Brain and language123 (2), 81–93.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Pinker, S. (1999). Words and rules. New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Pinker, S. & M. T.Ullman (2002). The past and future of the past tense. Trends in cognitive sciences6(11), 456–463.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Pulvermüller, F. & Y.Shtyrov (2003). Automatic processing of grammar in the human brain as revealed by the mismatch negativity. Neuroimage20(1), 159–172.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Pulvermüller, F. & Y.Shtyrov (2006). Language outside the focus of attention: the mismatch negativity as a tool for studying higher cognitive processes. Progress in neurobiology79(1), 49–71.
    [Google Scholar]
41. R Core Team (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. <http://www.R-project.org/>
    [Google Scholar]
42. Rastle, K. & M. H.Davis (2008). Morphological decomposition based on the analysis of orthography. Language and Cognitive Processes23 (7-8), 942–971.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Rumelhart, D.E. & J.L.McClelland (1988). Parallel distributed processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Schreuder, R. (2003). Frequency effects in regular inflectional morphology: Revisiting Dutch plurals. In: R.H.Baayen & R.Schreuder (eds.), Morphological structure in language processing. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 355–390.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Schreuder, R. & R.H.Baayen (1997). How complex simplex words can be. Journal of Memory and Language37(1), 118–139.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Schriefers, H., A.Friederici & P.Graetz (1992). Inflectional and derivational morphology in the mental lexicon: Symmetries and asymmetries in repetition priming. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology44(2), 373–390.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Shtyrov, Y. & F.Pulvermüller (2002). Memory traces for inflectional affixes as shown by mismatch negativity. European Journal of Neuroscience15(6), 1085–1091.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Stockall, L. & A.Marantz (2006). A single route, full decomposition model of morphological complexity: MEG evidence. The Mental Lexicon1(1), 85–123.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Tabak, W., R.Schreuder & R.H.Baayen (2005). Lexical statistics and lexical processing: semantic density, information complexity, sex, and irregularity in Dutch. In: S.Kepser & M.Reis (eds.), Linguistic evidence: Empirical, theoretical, and computational perspectives. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 529–555.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Taft, M. (2004). Morphological decomposition and the reverse base frequency effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Section A57(4), 745–765.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Taft, M. & K.I.Forster (1975). Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior14(6), 638–647.
    [Google Scholar]