Conceptueel kader voor wisselwerking van platformkenmerken, affordances en normen op sociale media

References

1. Arguedas, A. R., Robertson, C. T., Fletcher, R., & Kleis Nielsen, R. (2022). Echo chambers, filter bubbles, and polarisation: A literature review. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Axelrod, R. (1984) The Evolution of Cooperation. Basic Books.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Asch, S. (1951). Effects of Group Pressure on the Modification and Distortion of Judgments. In H.Guetzknow (Ed.), Groups, Leadership and Men (pp. 177-190). Carnegie Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bastiaensens, S., Vandebosch, H., Poels, K., Van Cleemput, K., DeSmet, A., & De Bourdeaudhuij, I. (2015). ‘Can I afford to help?’ How affordances of communication modalities guide bystanders’ helping intentions towards harassment on social network sites. Behaviour & Information Technology, 34(4), 425-435.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Beer, D. (2017). The social power of algorithms. Information, Communication & Society, 20(1), 1-13.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bernstein, M., Monroy-Hernández, A., Harry, D., André, P., Panovich, K., & Vargas, G. (2021). 4chan and /b/: An Analysis of Anonymity and Ephemerality in a Large Online Community. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 5(1), 50-57. https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/ICWSM/article/view/14134
   [Google Scholar]
7. boyd, d. (2010). Social Network Sites as Networked Publics: Affordances, Dynamics, and Implications. In Z.Papacharissi (Ed.), A Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites (pp. 39-58). Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group
   [Google Scholar]
8. boyd, d. (2002). Faceted id/entity: Managing representation in a digital world [Master’s Thesis, Program in Media Arts and Sciences]. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   [Google Scholar]
9. boyd, d. & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210-230.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Bucher, T., & Helmond, A. (2018). The Affordances of Social Media Platforms. In J.Burgess, A.Marwick, & T.Poell, The SAGE Handbook of Social Media (pp. 233-253). SAGE Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society. Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Centola, D., & Macy, M. (2007). Complex Contagions and the Weakness of Long Ties. American Journal of Sociology, 113(3), 702-734.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. (2004). Social Influence: Compliance and Conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55(1), 591-621.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Cialdini, R. B., Reno, R. R., & Kallgren, C. A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1015-1026.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Cinelli, M., Morales, G. D. F., Galeazzi, A., Quattrociocchi, W., & Starnini, M. (2021). The echo chamber effect on social media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(9). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2023301118
    [Google Scholar]
16. Coleman, J. (1990) Foundations of Social Theory. Belknap.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Davis, J. L., & Chouinard, J. B. (2016). Theorizing Affordances: From Request to Refuse. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 36(4), 241-248.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Del Vicario, M., Vivaldo, G., Bessi, A., Zollo, F., Scala, A., Caldarelli, G., & Quattrociocchi, W. (2016). Echo Chambers: Emotional Contagion and Group Polarization on Facebook. Scientific Reports, 6(1), 37825.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Delfanti, A., & Arvidsson, A. (2018). Introduction to Digital Media. John Wiley & Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Evans, S. K., Pearce, K. E., Vitak, J., & Treem, J. W. (2017). Explicating Affordances: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Affordances in Communication Research. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(1), 35-52.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Gaudette, T., Scrivens, R., Davies, G., & Frank, R. (2020). Upvoting extremism: Collective identity formation and the extreme right on Reddit. New Media & Society, 146144482095812.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Gibson, A. (2019). Free Speech and Safe Spaces: How Moderation Policies Shape Online Discussion Spaces. Social Media + Society, 5(1), 205630511983258.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Houghton Mifflin.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Gibson, J. J. (1982). Notes on affordances. In Reasons for realism. Selected Essays of James J. Gibson (pp. 401-418). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Gillespie, T. (2018). Custodians of the internet: Platforms, content moderation, and the hidden decisions that shape social media. Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Graham, T. (2018). Platforms and hyper-choice on the World Wide Web. Big Data & Society, 5(1), 205395171876587.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Granovetter, M. (1978). Threshold Models of Collective Behavior. American Journal of Sociology, 83(6), 1420-1443.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Helberger, N., Pierson, J., & Poell, T. (2018). Governing online platforms: From contested to cooperative responsibility. The Information Society, 34(1), 1-14.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Hsieh, Y. P. (2012). Online social networking skills: The social affordances approach to digital inequality. First Monday. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v17i4.3893
    [Google Scholar]
30. Ito, M. (2008). Introduction. In K.Varnelis (Ed.), Networked Publics (pp. 1-14). MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Jacobs, J. (2019, November22). Will Instagram Ever ‘Free the Nipple’?The New York Times. Geraadpleegd op 8augustus2022, van https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/22/arts/design/instagram-free-the-nipple.html
    [Google Scholar]
32. Janis, I. L. (1982). Groupthink: Psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascoes (2nd ed). Houghton Mifflin.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Jhaver, S., Bruckman, A., & Gilbert, E. (2019). Does Transparency in Moderation Really Matter?: User Behavior After Content Removal Explanations on Reddit. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 3(CSCW), 1-27.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Legros, S., & Cislaghi, B. (2020). Mapping the Social-Norms Literature: An Overview of Reviews. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(1), 62-80.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Lessig, L. (1999). Code and other laws of cyberspace (Nachdr.). Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Light, B., Burgess, J., & Duguay, S. (2018). The walkthrough method: An approach to the study of apps. New Media & Society, 20(3), 881-900.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Marwick, A. E. (2021). Morally Motivated Networked Harassment as Normative Reinforcement. Social Media + Society, 7(2), 205630512110213.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Massanari, A. (2017). #Gamergate and The Fappening: How Reddit’s algorithm, governance, and culture support toxic technocultures. New Media & Society, 19(3), 329-346.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Matias, J. N. (2019). Preventing harassment and increasing group participation through social norms in 2,190 online science discussions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(20), 9785-9789.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Meier, F., Elsweiler, D., & Wilson, M. (2014). More than Liking and Bookmarking? Towards Understanding Twitter Favouriting Behaviour. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 8(1), 346-355.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Miškolci, J., Kováčová, L., & Rigová, E. (2020). Countering Hate Speech on Facebook: The Case of the Roma Minority in Slovakia. Social Science Computer Review, 38(2), 128-146.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Newman, M. E. J., Barabási, A.-L., & Watts, D. J. (Eds.). (2006). The structure and dynamics of networks. Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. New York University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Norman, D. A. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Parsons, T. (1951) The Social System. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Picone, I., Kleut, J., Pavlíčková, T., Romic, B., Møller Hartley, J., & De Ridder, S. (2019). Small acts of engagement: Reconnecting productive audience practices with everyday agency. New Media & Society, 21(9), 2010-2028.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Picone, I., & Vandenplas, R. (2022). Windows to the World: Imagining Flemish News Audiences and Their Views on Society through the Lens of News Repertoires. Digital Journalism, 10(1), 87-108.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Pierson, J. (2021). Digital Platforms as Entangled Infrastructures: Addressing Public Values and Trust in Messaging Apps. European Journal of Communication, 12.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Poell, T., Nieborg, D., & van Dijck, J. (2019). Platformisation. Internet Policy Review, 8(4).
    [Google Scholar]
50. Postigo, H. (2016). The socio-technical architecture of digital labor: Converting play into YouTube money. New Media & Society, 18(2), 332-349.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Rajendra-Nicolucci, E. C., & Zuckerman, E. (2021). An Illustrated Field Guide to Social Media (p. 119). Knight First Amendment Institute. https://knightcolumbia.org/blog/an-illustrated-field-guide-to-social-media
    [Google Scholar]
52. Rossini, P., Stromer-Galley, J., Baptista, E. A., & Veiga de Oliveira, V. (2021). Dysfunctional information sharing on WhatsApp and Facebook: The role of political talk, cross-cutting exposure and social corrections. New Media & Society, 23(8), 2430-2451.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Scissors, L., Burke, M., & Wengrovitz, S. (2016). What’s in a Like?: Attitudes and behaviors around receiving Likes on Facebook. Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, 1501-1510.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Seering, J., Kraut, R., & Dabbish, L. (2017). Shaping Pro and Anti-Social Behavior on Twitch Through Moderation and Example-Setting. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, 111-125.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Shah, R. C., & Kesan, J. P. (2007). How Architecture Regulates. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 24(4), 350-359.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Somers, J. (2017). The Like Button Ruined the Internet. The Atlantic. Geraadpleegd op 25november2021, van https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2017/03/how-the-like-button-ruined-the-internet/519795
    [Google Scholar]
57. Statista (2022) Most popular social networks worldwide as of January 2022, ranked by number of monthly active users. Statista. Geraadpleegd op [..] january2022, van https://web.archive.org/web/20220825151036/https://www.statista.com/statistics/272014/global-social-networks-ranked-by-number-of-users
    [Google Scholar]
58. Sunstein, C. R. (2009). Republic. Com 2. 0. Princeton University Press
    [Google Scholar]
59. Tadesse, M. M., Lin, H., Xu, B., & Yang, L. (2018). Personality Predictions Based on User Behavior on the Facebook Social Media Platform. IEEE Access, 6, 61959-61969.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. In J. T.Jost & J.Sidanius (Eds.), Political Psychology: Key readings (0 ed., pp. 276–293). Psychology Press.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Theocharis, Y., Cardenal, A., Jin, S., Aalberg, T., Hopmann, D. N., Strömbäck, J., Castro, L., Esser, F., Van Aelst, P., de Vreese, C., Corbu, N., Koc-Michalska, K., Matthes, J., Schemer, C., Sheafer, T., Splendore, S., Stanyer, J., Stępińska, A., & Štětka, V. (2021). Does the platform matter? Social media and COVID-19 conspiracy theory beliefs in 17 countries. New Media & Society, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211045666
    [Google Scholar]
62. Treem, J. W., & Leonardi, P. M. (2013). Social Media Use in Organizations: Exploring the Affordances of Visibility, Editability, Persistence, and Association. Annals of the International Communication Association, 36(1), 143-189.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Van Dijck, J. (2013). Disassembling platforms, reassembling sociality. In J.Van Dijck, The culture of connectivity: A critical history of social media (pp. 24-44). Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Van Raemdonck, N. (2019). The Echo chamber of anti-vaccination conspiracies: Mechanisms of radicalisation on Facebook and Reddit. In The Digital Age, Cyber Space, and Social Media: The Challenges of Security & Radicalization: Vol. Book 6.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Wachs, S., & Wright, M. (2018). Associations between Bystanders and Perpetrators of Online Hate: The Moderating Role of Toxic Online Disinhibition. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(9), 2030.
    [Google Scholar]
66. Watt, A. (2014). The Entity Relationship Data Model. In A.Watt, & N.Eng, Database Design. BCcampus. https://opentextbc.ca/dbdesign01/chapter/chapter-8-entity-relationship-model
    [Google Scholar]
67. Wellman, B., Quan-Haase, A., Boase, J., Chen, W., Hampton, K., Díaz, I., & Miyata, K. (2003). The Social Affordances of the Internet for Networked Individualism. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 8(3), JCMC834.
    [Google Scholar]
68. Zadrozny, B. (2020, February6). On Facebook, anti-vaxxers urged a mom not to give her son Tamiflu. He later died. NBC News. Geraadpleegd op 8augustus2022, van https://web.archive.org/web/20200207045147/https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncna1131936
    [Google Scholar]