Hoe algoritmen een extra laag toevoegen aan de journalistiek | Amsterdam University Press Journals Online
2004
Volume 52, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1384-6930
  • E-ISSN: 1875-7286

Abstract

Samenvatting

Deze studie is een samenvatting van een onderzoeksproject dat focust op de interactie tussen de journalist enerzijds en het algoritme anderzijds. Ze vergroot ons begrip van hoe deze tools in de vorm van algoritmen de journalistiek als instituut veranderen, dan wel heruitvinden. De studie rijkt zowel theoretische implicaties aan binnen de communicatiewetenschappen, als praktische aanbevelingen voor het werkveld.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/TCW2023.X.004.COOL
2024-03-01
2024-07-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/13846930/52/1/TCW2024.1.005.COOL.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5117/TCW2023.X.004.COOL&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Beckett, C. (2019). New powers, new responsibilities: A global survey of journalism and artificial intelligence. Polis, London School of Economics and Political Science. http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/polis/2019/11/18/new-powers-new-responsibilities.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Boczkowski, P. J. (2005). Digitizing the news: Innovation in online newspapers. MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Boczkowski, P. J. (2010). News at Work. University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Boyles, J. L. (2016). The isolation of innovation: Restructuring the digital newsroom through intrapreneurship. Digital Journalism, 4(2), 229-246.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Broussard, M. (2015). Artificial intelligence for investigative reporting: Using an expert system to enhance journalists’ ability to discover original public affairs stories. Digital Journalism, 3(6), 814-831.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Broussard, M. (2018). Artificial unintelligence: How computers misunderstand the world. MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Carlson, M. (2015). The robotic reporter: Automated journalism and the redefinition of labor, compositional forms, and journalistic authority. Digital Journalism, 3(3), 416-431.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Caswell, D., & Dörr, K. (2018). Automated journalism 2.0: Event-driven narratives: From simple descriptions to real stories. Journalism Practice, 12(4), 477-496.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Cave, S. & Dihal, K. (2019) Hopes and fears for intelligent machines in fiction and reality. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(2), 74-78.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Chuan, C. H., Tsai, W. H. S., & Cho, S. Y. (2019, januari). Framing artificial intelligence in American newspapers. In Proceedings of the 2019 AA/ACM Conference on A.I., Ethics, and Society, 339-344.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Coddington, M. (2015). Clarifying journalism’s quantitative turn: A typology for evaluating data journalism, computationele journalistiek , and computer-assisted reporting. Digital Journalism, 3(3), 331-348.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Cools, H., Van Gorp, B., & Opgenhaffen, M. (2021). When algorithms recommend what’s new (s): New dynamics of decision-making and autonomy in newsgathering. Media and Communication, 9(4), 198-207.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Cools, H., Van Gorp, B., & Opgenhaffen, M. (2022). New organizations, different journalistic roles, and innovative projects: How second-generation newsroom innovation labs are changing the news ecosystem. Journalism Practice, 1-16.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Cools, H. (2022). How algorithms are augmenting the journalistic institution: In search of evidence from newsrooms and its innovation labs [Doctoral dissertation, KU Leuven].
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Cools, H., Van Gorp, B., & Opgenhaffen, M. (2023). Newsroom engineering teams as “survival entities” for journalism?Mapping the process of institutionalization at The Washington Post. Digital Journalism.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Diakopoulos, N. (2019). Automating the news: How algorithms are rewriting the media. Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Diakopoulos, N. and M.Koliska. (2017). Algorithmic Transparency in the News Media, Digital Journalism, 5(7), 809-828.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Dörr, K. N., and Hollnbuchner, K. (2017). Ethical challenges of algorithmic journalism. Digital journalism, 5(4), 404-419.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Fast, E., & Horvitz, E. (2017). Long-term trends in the public perception of artificial intelligence. In Proceedings of the AAA.I. conference on artificial intelligence, 31(1), 23-37.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Gracía-Avilés, J. A. (2021). Journalism innovation research, a diverse and flourishing field (2000-2020). Profesional de la informaciÓn (EPI), 30(1), 1-33.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Golan, G. (2006). Inter-media agenda setting and global news coverage: Assessing the influence of the New York Times on three network television evening news programs. Journalism studies, 7(2), 323-333.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Helberger, N. (2019). On the democratic role of news recommenders. Digital Journalism, 7(8), 993-1012.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Hogh-Janovsky, I., & Meier, K. (2021). Journalism innovation labs 2.0 in media organisations: A motor for transformation and constant learning. Journalism and Media, 2(3), 361-378.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Jacobi, C., Van Atteveldt, W., and Welbers, K. (2016). Quantitative analysis of large amounts of journalistic texts using topic modelling. Digital journalism, 4(1), 89-106.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Kovach, B., and Rosenstiel, T. (2001). Are watchdogs an endangered species?Columbia Journalism Review, 40(1), 50-61.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Lamot, K. (2021). Metrics for news: The uses and effects of analytics in journalism Doctoral dissertation, University of Antwerp.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Lindén, C. (2016). Decades of automation in the newsroom. Digital Journalism, 5(2), 123-140.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. McQuail, D. (1987). Mass communication theory: An introduction. Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Meraz, S. (2009). Is there an elite hold? Traditional media to social media agenda setting influence in blog networks. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(3), 682-707.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Napoli, P. M. (2014). Automated media: An institutional theory perspective on algorithmic media production and consumption. Communication Theory, 24(3), 340-360.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Nunes, A. C., & Mills, J. (2019). Media labs, unlocking change. Trends in Newsrooms, 3, 1-27.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. O’Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. Broadway books.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Pavlik, J. V. (2013). Innovation and the future of journalism. Digital Journalism, 1(2), 181-193.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Reese, S. D. (2022). The Institution of Journalism: Conceptualizing the Press in a Hybrid Media System. Digital Journalism, 10(2), 253-266.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Stray, J. (2019). Making artificial intelligence work for investigative journalism. Digital Journalism, 7(8), 1076-1097.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Thurman, N., Lewis, S. C., & Kunert, J. (2019). Algorithms, automation, and news. Digital Journalism, 7(8), 980-992.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Wiley, S. K. (2021). The grey area: How regulations impact autonomy in computationele journalistiek. Digital Journalism, 1-18.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Wölker, A., & Powell, T. E. (2021). Algorithms in the newsroom? News readers’ perceived credibility and selection of automated journalism. Journalism, 22(1), 86-103.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Zarouali, B., Helberger, N., & de Vreese, C. H. (2021). Investigating algorithmic misconceptions in a media context: Source of a new digital divide?Media and Communication, 9(4), 134-144.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/TCW2023.X.004.COOL
Loading
/content/journals/10.5117/TCW2023.X.004.COOL
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error