2004
Volume 69, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0039-8691
  • E-ISSN: 2215-1214

Abstract

Abstract

This article presents an in-depth study of the Frisian loan from Dutch . This word can be literally glossed as ‘peanut cheese’, but it translates into English as ‘peanut butter’. The translation illustrates that the compound is not compositional in Dutch and Frisian, that is, is not a kind of (‘cheese’). Because of its non-compositional nature, Dutch , we argue, has not been borrowed into Frisian as , even though Dutch in Frisian is . In contrast, compositional compounds featuring Dutch surface in Frisian with –, such as Dutch , Frisian . The non-compositional nature of is shown to have a historical explanation. Independent evidence is cited from psycholinguistics supporting the claim that compositional compounds behave in a way that differs from non-compositional ones. Thus evidence is provided that borrowing is sensitive to compositionality in that elements of compounds are more easily left untranslated when their meaning is not predictable by compositionality from their usage elsewhere in the language.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/TET2017.1.HOEK
2017-09-01
2022-05-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/00398691/69/1/07_TET2017.1.HOEK.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5117/TET2017.1.HOEK&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/TET2017.1.HOEK
Loading
/content/journals/10.5117/TET2017.1.HOEK
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): borrowing; compositionality; loan blends; semantic transparency
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error