oa Continuity, change, and linguistic recycling in Flemish dialects: Negation, polarity focus, and mirativity¹

References

1. Aikhenvald, Alexandra. 2012. “The essence of mirativity.”Linguistic Typology16: 435–485.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Authier, J.-Marc, and LilianeHaegeman. 2019. “The Syntax of Mirative Focus Fronting: Evidence from French.” In DeborahArteaga (ed.), Contributions of Romance Languages to Current Linguistic Theory, 39–63. Cham: Springer.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Barbiers, Sjef, HansBennis, GuntherDe Vogelaer, MagdaDevos, and Margreetvan der Ham. 2005. Syntactische Atlas van de Nederlandse Dialecten, Volume I. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Barbiers, Sjef et al. 2006. Dynamische Syntactische Atlas van de Nederlandse Dialecten (DynaSAND). Amsterdam: Meertens Institute. Online: http://www.meertens.knaw.nl/sand/.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Barbiers, Sjef, Johanvan der Auwera, HansBennis, EefjeBoef, GuntherDe Vogelaer, and Margreetvan der Ham. 2009. Syntactische Atlas van de Nederlandse Dialecten. Volume II. Amsterdam: AUP.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Beheydt, Griet. 1998. “Het gebruik en de vorm van de negatie in het zuidelijke Nederlands in een diachronisch perspectief (15e–20e eeuw).”Licentiate’s thesis, University Leuven.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Blancquaert, Edgard. 1948. “Na meer dan 25 jaar dialect-onderzoek op het terrein.”Koninklijke Vlaamse Academie voor Taal- en LetterkundeIII. 5–62.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Breitbarth, A.2013. “Negation in the history of Low German and Dutch.” In D.Willis, et al. (eds.), The development of negation in the languages of Europe and the Mediterranean, vol. 1: Case studies, 190–238. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Breitbarth, Anne. 2014a. The History of Low German Negation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Breitbarth, Anne. 2014b. “Dialect Contact and the Speed of Jespersen’s Cycle in Middle Low German.”Taal & Tongval66 (1): 1–20.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Breitbarth, Anne, and LilianeHaegeman. 2014. “The distribution of preverbal en in (West) Flemish: syntactic and interpretive properties.”Lingua147, 69–86.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Breitbarth, Anne, and LilianeHaegeman. 2015. “‘En’ en is n et wat we dachten: a Flemish discourse particle.”MITWPL75: 85–102.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Breitbarth, Anne, ChristopherLucas, and DavidWillis. 2020. The History of Negation in the Languages of Europe and the Mediterranean. Volume II: Patterns and Processes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Burridge, Kate. 1993. Syntactic change in Germanic: Aspects of language change in Germanic with particular reference to Middle Dutch. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Knowledge of language: its nature, origin and use. New York: Praeger.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Dahl, Östen. 2004. The growth and maintenance of linguistic complexity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Dal, Ingerid (1966). Kurze deutsche Syntax auf historischer Grundlage. 3rd ed. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Dietz, Feike, Marjovan Koppen, and Meesvan Zanten. 2021. “Spelen met verwachtingen: De functie van tweeledige negatie in de scheepsjournalen van Michiel de Ruyter.”Ms., Utrecht University.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Farasyn, Melissa, Anne-SophieGhyselen, JacquesVan Keymeulen, and AnneBreitbarth. 2022. “Challenges in Tagging and Parsing Spoken Dialects of Dutch.”Journal of Historical Syntax6, No. 4-11. doi:10.18148/hs/2022.v6i4-11.92.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Gelderen, Elly van. 2011. The Linguistic Cycle. Language Change and the Language Faculty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Ghyselen, Anne-Sophie, AnneBreitbarth, MelissaFarasyn, JacquesVan Keymeulen, and Arjanvan Hessen. 2020a. “Clearing the Transcription Hurdle in Dialect Corpus Building: The Corpus of Southern Dutch Dialects as Case Study.”Frontiers of Artificial Intelligence3: 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2020.00010
    [Google Scholar]
22. Ghyselen, Anne-Sophie, JacquesVan Keymeulen, MelissaFarasyn, LienHellebaut, and AnneBreitbarth. 2020b. “Het transcriptieprotocol van het Gesproken Corpus van de Nederlandse Dialecten (GCND).”Handelingen van de Koninklijke Commissie voor Toponymie en Dialectologie/Bulletin de la Commission Royale de Toponymie et Dialectologie92: 83–115. https://doi.org/10.2143/TD.92.0.3288999
    [Google Scholar]
23. Goss, E. L.2002. Negotiated language change in Early Modern Holland. Immigration and linguistic variation in The Hague (1600–1670). University of Wisconsin-Madison Ph.D. dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Haan, Germen J. de and FredWeerman. 1984. Taaltypologie, taalverandering en mogelijke grammatica’s: Het Middelnederlandse en. Tijdschrift voor Nederlandse Taal- en Letterkunde100, 161–190.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Haegeman, Liliane. 1995. The syntax of negation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Haegeman, Liliane. 1998. “Verb Movement in Embedded Clauses in West Flemish.”Linguistic Inquiry29 (4): 631–656.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Haegeman, Liliane, and TerjeLohndal. 2010. “Negative Concord and (Multiple) Agree: A Case Study of West Flemish.”Linguistic Inquiry41 (2): 181–211.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Haspelmath, Martin. 1997. Indefinite pronouns. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Hawkins, Roger, and HajimeHattori. 2006. “Interpretation of English multiple wh-questions by Japanese speakers: a missing uninterpretable feature account.”Second Language Research22: 269–301.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Horst, Johannes M. van der and Maria J.van der Wal. 1979. Negatieverschijnselen en woordvolgorde in de geschiedenis van het Nederlands. Tijdschrift voor Nederlandse Taal- en Letterkunde95, 6–37.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Howell, R. B.2006. “Immigration and koinéisation: The formation of early modern Dutch urban vernaculars.”Transactions of the Philological Society104: 207–227.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Jäger, Agnes. 2008. History of German negation. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Jespersen, Otto. 1917. Negation in English and Other Languages. Historisk-filologiske Meddelelser I, 5. Kopenhagen: A.F. Høst.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Koelmans, Leendert. 1967. “Over de verbreiding van het ontkennende en.”De Nieuwe Taalgids60: 12–18.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Koppen, Marjo van. 2019. Negation in the letters of P.C. Hooft: combining literary studies and linguistics. Lecture at Discovering Linguistics – Linguistic Discoveries, Ghent University, 15/03/2019.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Lockwood, William Burley (1968). Historical German Syntax. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Lybaert, Chloé, BernardDe Clerck, JorienSaelens, and LudovicDe Cuypere. 2019. “A corpus-based analysis of V2 variation in West Flemish and French Flemish dialects.”Journal of Germanic Linguistics31 (1): 43–100. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1470542718000028
    [Google Scholar]
38. Neuckermans, A.2008. “Negatie in de Vlaamse dialecten volgens de gegevens van de Syntactische Atlas van de Nederlandse Dialecten (SAND).” PhD diss., Ghent University.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Nevalainen, Terttu, and GijsbertRutten (eds.). 2012. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen113(3), special issue on comparative historical sociolinguistics and the history of negation. https://www.jstor.org/stable/i40133074
    [Google Scholar]
40. Nobels, Judith, and GijsbertRutten. 2014. “Language norms and language use in seventeenth-century Dutch: Negation and the genitive.” In: GijsbertRutten, RikVosters, and WimVandenbussche (red.), Norms and usage in language history, 1600-1900. A sociolinguistic and comparative perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 21–48.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Overdiep, Gerrit Siebe (1933a). Dialectstudie en syntaxis. Onze Taaltuin2, 18–23.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Overdiep, Gerrit Siebe (1933b). Dialectstudie en syntaxis: een overgangsklank. Onze Taaltuin2, 44–45.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Postma, Gertjan. 2002. De enkelvoudige clitische negatie in het Middelnederlands en de Jespersen cyclus. Nederlandse Taalkunde7, 44–82.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Roberts, Ian, and AnnaRoussou. 2003. Syntactic Change. A Minimalist Approach to Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Ryckeboer, Hugo. 1986. Het hulpwerkwoord doen in replieken. In MagdaDevos and JohanTaeldeman (eds.), Vruchten van z’n akker. Opstellen van (oud-)medewerkers en oud-studenten voor Prof. V.F. Vanacker hem aangeboden bij zijn afscheid van de Rijksuniversiteit Gent, 321–337. Gent: Seminarie voor Nederlandse Taalkunde en Vlaamse Dialectologie, Rijksuniversiteit Gent.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Tavernier, C.1959. Over negatie en expletief en in het Gents dialect. Taal en Tongval11, 245–252.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Tsimpli, Ianthi Maria, and MariaDimitrakopoulou. 2007. “The Interpretability Hypothesis: evidence from wh-interrogatives in second language acquisition.”Second Language Research23: 215–242.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Vanacker, Valeer F., and GeorgesDe Schutter. 1967. “Zuidnederlandse dialekten op de band.”Taal en Tongval19: 35–51.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen. 2004. Ellipsis in Dutch Dialects. Doctoral Dissertation, Universiteit Leiden.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Van de Velde, Freek. 2012. “A structural–functional account of NP-internal mood.”Lingua122(1): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2011.10.007
    [Google Scholar]
51. Van der Auwera, Johan. 2009. ‘The Jespersen Cycles’. In Ellyvan Gelderen (ed.), Cyclical change, 35–71. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Van Keymeulen, J. (1975). Enkele syntactische kenmerken van het Wichels dialect. Licentieproefschrift. Gent: Universiteit Gent.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Vosters, Rik, and WimVandenbussche. 2012. “Bipartite negation in 18th and early 19th century Southern Dutch. Sociolinguistic aspects of norms and variation.”Neuphilologische Mitteilungen113(3), 343-64.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Walkden, George, and AnneBreitbarth. 2019. “Complexity as L2-Difficulty: Implications for Syntactic Change.”Theoretical Linguistics45 (3–4): 183–209. https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2019-0012
    [Google Scholar]
55. Wallage, Phillip W.2005. Negation in Early English: Parametric variation and grammatical competition. Doctoral dissertation, University of York.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Zeijlstra, Hedde. 2004. “Sentential negation and negative concord.” PhD diss., University of Amsterdam. Utrecht: LOT.
    [Google Scholar]