oa Micro and macro variation: Diverse approaches in research on language variation and change

References

1. Auer, Peter. 2018. “Dialect Change in Europe–Leveling and Convergence.” In The Handbook of Dialectology, edited by CharlesBoberg, JohnNerbonne, and DominicWatt, 159–76. Wiley Online Library.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Auer, Peter, and FransHinskens. 2005. “The Role of Interpersonal Accommodation in a Theory of Language Change.” In Dialect Change, edited by PeterAuer, FransHinskens, and PaulKerswill, 1st ed., 335–57. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486623.015.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Backus, Ad.2012. “Turkish as an Immigrant Language in Europe.” In The Handbook of Bilingualism and Multilingualism, edited by Tej K.Bhatia and William C.Ritchie, 1st ed., 770–90. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118332382.ch31.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Breitbarth, Anne, Anne-SophieGhyselen, RoelandVan Hout, and MartijnWieling. 2023. “Big data: New perspectives for research on language variation and change.”Taal en Tongval75 (1): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.5117/TET2023.1.001.BREI.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Civico, Marco. 2019. “The Dynamics of Language Minorities: Evidence from an Agent-Based Model of Language Contact.”Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation22 (4): 3. https://doi.org/10.18564/jasss.4097.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Clyne, Michael. 2000. “Lingua Franca and Ethnolects in Europe and Beyond.”Sociolinguistica14 (1). https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110245196.83.
   [Google Scholar]
7. De Caluwe, Johan, and EvelienVan Renterghem. 2011. “Regiolectisering En de Opkomst van Tussentaal in Vlaanderen.”Taal En Tongval63 (1): 61–77.
   [Google Scholar]
8. De Tier, Veronique, HansVan de Velde, MartineSchrier, JosSwanenberg, and TonVan De Wijngaard. 2008. “Oe Praet Jie? Zeeuwen, Brabanders En Limburgers over Hun Eigen Dialecten.”Zeeland. Tijdschrift van Het Koninklijk Zeeuws Genootschap Der Wetenschappen17:53–61.
   [Google Scholar]
9. De Vogelaer, Gunther, and ChrisDe Wulf. 2020. “Taal & Tongval Zonder Dialecten?”Taal En Tongval72 (1): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.5117/TET2020.1.DEVO.
   [Google Scholar]
10. De Vogelaer, Gunther, and WilbertHeeringa. 2011. “Regiolectisering: Impulsen Voor Verder Onderzoek.”Taal En Tongval63 (1): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.5117/TET2011.1.DEVO.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Dorian, Nancy C.1980. “Language Shift in Community and Individual: The Phenomenon of the Laggard Semi-Speaker.”
    [Google Scholar]
12. El-Aissati, Abderrahman, LouisBoumans, and LeonieCornips. 2005. “Turks-En Marokkaans Nederlands.” In Wereldnederlands. Oude En Jonge Variëteiten van Het Nederlands, 149–83. SDU.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Grondelaers, Stefan, and RoelandVan Hout. 2011. “The Standard Language Situation in the Low Countries: Top-down and Bottom-up Variations on a Diaglossic Theme.”Journal of Germanic Linguistics23 (3): 199–243. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1470542711000110.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Hinskens, Frans. 2011. “Emerging Moroccan and Turkish Varieties in Dutch.”Ethnic Styles of Speaking in European Metropolitan Areas8:101–29.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Moulin-Frier, Clément, JulienDiard, Jean-LucSchwartz, and PierreBessière. 2015. “COSMO (‘Communicating about Objects Using Sensory–Motor Operations’): A Bayesian Modeling Framework for Studying Speech Communication and the Emergence of Phonological Systems.”Journal of Phonetics53:5–41.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Muysken, Pieter. 2010. “Ethnolects of Dutch.” In Language and Space: Dutch, edited by FransHinskens and JohanTaeldeman, 739–61. Handbücher Zur Sprach- Und Kommunikationswissenschaft [Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science], Bd. 30.1-Bd.30.3. Berlin; New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Niedzielski, Nancy, and HowardGiles. 1996. “Linguistic Accommodation.”Contact Linguistics: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research1:332–42.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Nortier, Jacomine, and MargreetDorleijn. 2013. “Multi-Ethnolects: Kebabnorsk, Perkerdansk, Verlan, Kanakensprache, Straattaal, Etc.” In Contact Languages: A Comprehensive Guide, edited by PeterBakker and YaronMatras, 229–71. Language Contact and Bilingualism 6. Boston Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Pickering, Martin J., and SimonGarrod. 2013. “An Integrated Theory of Language Production and Comprehension.”Behavioral and Brain Sciences36 (4): 329–47. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X12001495.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Plevoets, Koen. 2008. “Tussen Spreek-En Standaardtaal: Een Corpusgebaseerd Onderzoek Naar de Situationele, Regionale En Sociale Verspreiding van Enkele Morfo-Syntactische Verschijnselen Uit Het Gesproken Belgisch-Nederlands.” PhD Thesis, Leuven, Belgium: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Schilling-Estes, Natalie. 2004. “Investigating Stylistic Variation.” In The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, 375–401. Blackwell Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Stevens, Mary, and JonathanHarrington. 2014. “The Individual and the Actuation of Sound Change.”Loquens1 (1): e003. https://doi.org/10.3989/loquens.2014.003.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Swanenberg, Jos, and RoelandVan Hout. 2013. “Recent Developments in the Mid Southern Dialects.” In Dutch, edited by FransHinskens and JohanTaeldeman, 319–35. Language and Space. Walter de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Taeldeman, Johan. 2008. “Zich Stabiliserende Grammaticale Kenmerken in Vlaamse Tussentaal.”Taal En Tongval60 (2).
    [Google Scholar]
25. Tagliamonte, Sali A, and JulianBrooke. 2014. “A Weird (Language) Tale: Variation and Change in the Adjectives of Strangeness.”American Speech89 (1): 4–41.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Trudgill, Peter. 1986. Dialects in Contact. Vol. 10. Language in Society. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Trudgill, Peter. 2008. “Colonial Dialect Contact in the History of European Languages: On the Irrelevance of Identity to New-Dialect Formation.”Language in Society37 (2): 241–54.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Van De Kamp, Justus. 2009. “Jodenhoeks: The Amsterdam Jewish Dialects and Its Influence upon the Dutch Language.”European Judaism: A Journal for the New Europe42 (2): 34–46.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Van de Velde, Hans, Anne-FrancePinget, CeskoVoeten, and DidierDemolin. 2021. “Laboratory Sociolinguistics.” In Cognitive Sociolinguistics Revisited, edited by GitteKristiansen, KarlienFranco, StefanoDe Pascale, LauraRosseel, and WeiweiZhang, 557–71. De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110733945-045.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Van Der Sijs, Nicoline. 2014. “Systematisch Onderzoek Naar Nederlandse Contactvariëteiten.”Taal En Tongval66 (2): 117–42. https://doi.org/10.5117/TET2014.2.SIJS.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Vandekerckhove, Reinhild. 2009. “Dialect Loss and Dialect Vitality in Flanders.”International Journal of the Sociology of Language2009 (196–197). https://doi.org/10.1515/IJSL.2009.017.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Voeten, Cesko C.2021. “Individual Differences in the Adoption of Sound Change.”Language and Speech64 (3): 705–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830920959753.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Willemyns, Roland. 2003. “Dutch.” In Germanic Standardizations: Past to Present, edited by AnaDeumert and WimVandenbussche, 93–126. Impact, Studies in Language and Society, v. 18. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: J. Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Yu, Alan C. L.2010. “Perceptual Compensation Is Correlated with Individuals’ ‘Autistic’ Traits: Implications for Models of Sound Change.” Edited by AldoRustichini. PLoS ONE5 (8): e11950. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011950.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Yu, Alan C. L.2013. “Individual Differences in Socio-cognitive Processing and Sound Change.” In Origins of Sound Change, edited by Alan C. L.Yu, 201–27. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199573745.003.0010.
    [Google Scholar]