oa De rol van semantische, pragmatische en sociolinguïstische factoren bij de grammaticalisatie van zitten/staan + te-infinitief

References

1. Bertinetto, Pier M., Karen H.Ebert and CasperDe Groot. 2000. “The progressive in Europe”. In Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe, edited by ÖstenDahl. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Breed, Adri, FrankBrisard and BenVerhoeven. 2017. “Periphrastic progressive constructions in Afrikaans and Dutch: A contrastive analysis”. Journal of Germanic Linguistics29: 305-378.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bybee, Joan, ReverePerkins and WilliamPagliuca. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Cameron, Deborah. 2003“Gender Issues in Language Change.”Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 23: 187–201.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Coppen, Peter-Arno. 2009. “Hoe zit het eigenlijk?”Onze Taal, 78(6):164-165.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Cavirani-Pots, Cora. 2020. “Roots in progress: Semi-lexicality in the Dutch and Afrikaans verbal domain.” PhD diss., LOT Dissertation series, Amsterdam.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Dahl, Östen. 2000. “The tense-aspect systems of European languages in a typological perspective”. In Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe, edited by ÖstenDahl, 3-26. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter..
   [Google Scholar]
8. Devillers, Laurence, Vasilescu, Ioana and LaurenceVidrascu. 2004. “F0 and pause features analysis for anger and fear detection in real-life spoken dialogs”. In Speech Prosody, International Conference. Nara, Japan
   [Google Scholar]
9. Geleyn, Tim and TimothyColleman. 2014. “De progressieve constructies bezig zijn en besig wees. Een contrastief corpusonderzoek Nederlands-Afrikaans”. Tydskrif vir Geesteswetenskappe, 54(1): 56-74.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Haeseryn, Walter, Romijn, Kirsten, Geerts, Guido, de Rooij, J. and van den Toorn, Maarten. 1997. 18.5.4.2 Liggen, zitten, hangen (onovergankelijk), staan, lopen (versie 2.1). Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst. https://e-ans.ivdnt.org/topics/pid/ans18050402lingtopic. (geraadpleegd 01maart2024).
11. Himmelmann, Nikolaus P.2004. “Lexicalisation and grammaticalization: Opposite or orthogonal?” In What makes Grammaticalization?: A Look from its Fringes and its Components, edited by WalterBisang, Nikolaus P.Himmelmann and BjörnWiemer, 21-44. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Hopper, Paul J. and Elizabeth C.Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization. United Kingdom. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Labov, William. 1996. The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Washington D.C. Center for Applied Linguistics. 1966.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Labov, William. 1990. “The intersection of sex and social class in the course of linguistic change”. Language Variation and Change, 2: 205-252.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Leivada, Evelina and MaritWestergaard. 2020. “Acceptable ungrammatical sentences, unacceptable grammatical sentences, and the role of the cognitive parser”. Frontiers in Psychology, 364.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Lemmens, Maarten. 2002. “The semantic network of Dutch posture verbs”. Linguistics of Sitting, Standing and Lying, edited by JohnNewman, 103-140. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Lemmens, Maarten. 2005. “Aspectual Posture Verb Constructions in Dutch”. Journal of Germanic Linguistics, 17(3): 183-217.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Lemmens, Maarten. 2015. “Zit je te denken of ben je aan het piekeren? Persistentie in het synchrone gebruik van de PREP- en POS- progressiefconstructies in het Nederlands”. Nederlandse Taalkunde, 20(1): 5-36.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Okabe, Ami. 2023. The historical development of the Dutch posture-verb progressive construction. LOT PhD Dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Schoenmakers, Gert-Jan and AdFoolen. 2022. “At the margins of grammar: Dutch and German verb particles in first sentence position”. Nederlandse Taalkunde27(3): 368-393.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Sprouse, Jon. “Acceptability judgments and grammaticality, prospects and challenges” In Syntactic Structures after 60 Years: The Impact of the Chomskyan Revolution in Linguistics, edited by NorbertHornstein, HowardLasnik, PrittyPatel-Grosz and CharlesYang, 195-224. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton
    [Google Scholar]
22. Trotzke, Andreas, StefanoQuaglia and EvaWittenberg. 2015. “Topicalization in German particle verb constructions: The role of semantic transparency”. Linguistische Berichte: 244: 407-424.
    [Google Scholar]
23. VanDale. (z.d.). “Zitten”. In Van Dale. Geraadpleegd op 12juni2023, van https://www.vandale.nl/gratis-woordenboek/nederlands/betekenis/zitten
    [Google Scholar]
24. Vismans, Roel. 1982. “Durative constructions in Modern Dutch”. In Free University Studies in English. A collection of Essays and Working Papers, edited by August J.Fry, J.Lachlan Mackenzie and RichardTodd, 243-265. Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
    [Google Scholar]