oa Come city, I am city: Associations with and appreciation of bare spatial predicates from youth Dutch

References

1. Appel, René. 1999. “Straattaal; de mengtaal van jongeren in Amsterdam.”Toegepaste Taalwetenschap in Artikelen62: 39–55.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Appel, René, and RobSchoonen. 2005. “Street language: A multilingual youth register in the Netherlands.”Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development26 (2): 85–117.
   [Google Scholar]
3. ATLAS.ti. 2024. Scientific software development GmbH. https://atlasti.com
4. Bennis, Hans, and FransHinskens. 2014. “Goed of fout: Niet-standaard inflectie in het hedendaags Standaardnederlands.”Nederlandse Taalkunde19 (2): 131–184.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bennis, Hans, and FransHinskens. 2022. “Coherent patterns in nonstandard inflection in modern colloquial Standard Dutch?” In The coherence of linguistic communities, edited by KarenBeaman and GregoryGuy, 221–238. Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Chartrand, Tanya, and JohnBargh. 1999. “The chameleon effect: The perceptionbehavior link and social interaction.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology76 (6): 893–910.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Chun, Elaine. 2009. “Speaking like Asian immigrants: Intersections of accommodation and mocking at a U.S. high school.”Pragmatics19 (1): 17–38.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Cornips, Leonie. 2008. “Loosing grammatical gender in Dutch: The result of bilingual acquisition and/or an act of identity?”International Journal of Bilingualism12 (1–2): 105–124.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Cornips, Leonie, and Vincentde Rooij. 2010. “Gefascineerd door jongerentaal.”Neerlandia114(2): 34–35.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Cornips, Leonie, and Vincentde Rooij. 2013. “Selfing and othering through categories of race, place, and language among minority youths in Rotterdam, The Netherlands.” In Multilingualism and language diversity in urban areas: Acquisition, identities, space, education, edited by PeterSiemund, IngridGogolin, Monika EdithSchulz, and JuliaDavydova, 129–164. John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Cremers, Ande. 2023. “De Marie-Clairisatie van het Nederlands: Over de rol van identiteit en prestige in de verspreiding van de nieuwste taalvariëteit.” Bachelor’s thesis, Radboud University.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Dewaele, Jean-Marc. 2018. “Why the dichotomy ‘L1 versus LX user’ is better than ‘native versus non-native speaker’.”Applied Linguistics39 (2): 236–240.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Doreleijers, Kristel, Marjovan Koppen, and JacomineNortier. 2019. “Lidwoordomissie in Moroccan Flavored Dutch: Kale nomina in eentalige Nederlandse uitingen.”Nederlandse Taalkunde24 (3): 291–322.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Dorleijn, Margreet, MaartenKossmann, and JacomineNortier. 2021. “Urban youth speech styles in multilingual settings.” In The Routledge handbook of language contact, edited by EvangeliaAdamou and YaronMatras, 366–384. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Eckert, Penelope. 1997. “Why ethnography?” In Ungdomsspråk i Norden: föredrag från ett forskarsymposium, edited by Ulla-BrittKotsinas, 57–62. Institutionen för nordiska språk and Stockholm University.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Goschler, Juliana, TillWoerfel, AnatolStefanowitsch, HeikeWiese, and ChristophSchroeder. 2013. “Beyond conflation patterns: The encoding of motion events in Kiezdeutsch.”Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association1: 237–252.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Grondelaers, Stefan, Paulvan Gent, and RoelandVan Hout. 2022. On the inevitability of social meaning and ideology in accounts of syntactic change: Evidence from pronoun competition in Netherlandic Dutch. In Explanations in Sociosyntax: Dialogue across paradigms, edited by Tanya KaroliChristensen and Torben JuelJensen, 120–143. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Grondelaers, Stefan, and StefaniaMarzo. 2023. “Why does the shtyle spread? Street prestige boosts the diffusion of urban vernacular features.”Language in Society52(2): 295–320.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Grondelaers, Stefan, and Paulvan Gent. 2019. “How “deep” is dynamism? Revisiting the evaluation of Moroccan-flavored Netherlandic Dutch.”Linguistics Vanguard5 (1): Article 20180011.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Hensen, Ykwinno. 2018. “Het verschil tussen lid zijn en lit zijn: Een sociolinguïstische vergelijking van studententaal en Straattaal.” Bachelor’s thesis, Utrecht University.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Hinskens, Frans. 2022. “Variation in R-pronouns in Moroccan and Turkish ethnolectal Dutch and what it tells us.”Languages7 (4): Article 259.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Hinskens, Frans, Roelandvan Hout, PieterMuysken, and Ariënvan Wijngaarden. 2021. “Variation and change in grammatical gender marking: The case of Dutch ethnolects.”Linguistics59(1): 75–100.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Hinskens, Frans, KhalidMourigh, and PieterMuysken. 2022. “The Netherlands: Urban contact dialects.” In PaulKerswill and HeikeWiese (eds.), Urban contact dialects and language change: Insights from the Global North and South, 223–245. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Hubers, Ferdy, TinekeSnijders, and Helende Hoop. 2016. “How the brain processes violations of the grammatical norm: An fMRI study.”Brain and Language163: 22–31.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Kristiansen, Tore. 2009. “The macro-level social meaning of late modern Danish accents.”Acta Linguistica Hafniensia40 (1): 167–192.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Latour, Britt, StefanGrondelaers, and Roelandvan Hout. 2012. “De schoonheid van taal – Hoe wezenlijk is het oordeel mooi in taalattitudes?”Taal & Tongval64(2): 243–261.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Marzo, Stefania, and EvyCeuleers. 2011. “The use of Citétaal among adolescents in Limburg: the role of space appropriation in language variation and change.”Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development32 (5): 451–464.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Meelen, Marieke, KhalidMourigh, and LisaLai-Shen Cheng. 2018. “V3 in urban youth varieties of Dutch.” In Syntactic architecture and its consequences II: Between syntax and morphology, edited by AndrásBárány, TheresaBiberauer, JamieDouglas, and StenVikner. 327–356, Language Science Press.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Mourigh, Khalid. 2023. “Gouda Moroccan Dutch: Linguistic ideology and practice in an urban youth variety.”Afrikanistik-Aegyptologie-Online1 (1).
    [Google Scholar]
30. Nortier, Jacomine. 2001. Murks en Straattaal: Vriendschap en taalgebruik onder jongeren. Prometheus.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Nortier, Jacomine, and MargreetDorleijn. 2008. “A Moroccan accent in Dutch: A sociocultural style restricted to the Moroccan community?”International Journal of Bilingualism12 (1/2): 125–142.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Pohle, Maria, and KathleenSchumann. 2014. „Keine Angst vor Kiezdeutsch! Zum neuen Dialekt der Multikulti-Generation.“Zeitschrift für Jugendkriminalrecht und Jugendhilfe25 (3): 216–224.
    [Google Scholar]
33. R Core Team. 2023. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Rampton, Ben. 2017. Crossing: Language and ethnicity among adolescents (3rd edition). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Sneller, Betsy. 2020. “Phonological rule spreading across hostile lines: (TH)-fronting in Philadelphia.”Language Variation and Change32(1): 25–47.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Schoenmakers, Gert-Jan. 2023. “Linguistic judgments in 3D: The aesthetic quality, linguistic acceptability, and surface probability of stigmatized and nonstigmatized variation.”Linguistics61 (3): 779–824.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Schoenmakers, Gert-Jan, and John DavidStorment. 2021. “Going city: Directional predicates and preposition incorporation in youth vernaculars of Dutch.” In Linguistics in the Netherlands38, edited by MarkDingemanse, Evavan Lier, and JorrigVogels, 65–80. John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
38. van der Sijs, Nicoline. 2014. “‘Laat-me-er-dit-van-zeggen’: Grammaticale bijzonderheden van het Surinaams-Nederlands.”Onze Taal83 (11): 314–316.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Trudgill, Peter. 1972. “Sex, covert prestige and linguistic change in the urban British English of Norwich.”Language in Society1(2): 179–195.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Zajonc, Robert. 1968. “Attitudinal effects of mere exposure.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology9 (2, Pt.2): 1–27.
    [Google Scholar]