2004
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Tijdschrift voor Arbeidsvraagstukken
  4. Volume 39, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 39, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 0169-2216
  • E-ISSN: 2468-9424

Abstract

Samenvatting

De COVID-19-pandemie heeft ervoor gezorgd dat velen opeens werden geconfronteerd met een verhoogde thuiswerkfrequentie. Zowel werknemers als werkgevers moesten leren omgaan met meer autonomie voor hun werknemers. Dit onderzoek bekeek voor 5316 werknemers in Nederland de relatie tussen thuiswerkintensiteit en burn-outklachten tussen december 2019 en december 2020. Daarbij onderzochten we ook in hoeverre autonomie en werkdruk de relatie tussen thuiswerkintensiteit en burn-outklachten (parallelle mediatie) medieerden en de mate waarin de steun van de leidinggevende een modererende rol speelde in de relaties tussen autonomie en werkdruk enerzijds en burn-outklachten anderzijds. Resultaten op basis van de NEA-COVID-19-paneldata laten zien dat het effect van thuiswerkintensiteit op burn-outklachten voornamelijk liep via de mediatoren autonomie en werkdruk. Een hogere mate van waargenomen steun van de leidinggevende kan fungeren als een buffer wanneer werknemers een verhoogde werkdruk ervaren die gepaard gaat met verhoogde burn-outklachten. Onze bevindingen bieden aanknopingspunten voor de inrichting en monitoring van thuiswerkbeleid.

© Roy Peijen & Ruud Gerards
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/TVA2023.2.005.PEIJ
2023-06-01
2025-04-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Allen, T. D., Golden, T. D., & Shockley, K. M. (2015). How effective is telecommuting? Assessing the status of our scientific findings. Psychological science in the public interest, 16(2), 40-68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100615593273
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Andrulli, R., & Gerards, R. (2023). How new ways of working during COVID-19 affect employee well-being via technostress, need for recovery, and work engagement. Computers in Human Behavior, 139, 107560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107560
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Arnold, J. A., Arad, S., Rhoades, J. A., & Drasgow, F. (2000). The empowering leadership questionnaire: The construction and validation of a new scale for measuring leader behaviors. Journal of organizational behavior, 21(3), 249-269. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(200005)21:3<249:AID-JOB10>3.0.CO;2-%23
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Atroszko, P. A., Demetrovics, Z., & Griffiths, M. D. (2020). Work Addiction, Obsessive-Compulsive Personality Disorder, Burn-Out, and Global Burden of Disease: Implications from the ICD-11. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(2), 660. https://doi.org/10.3390/IJERPH17020660
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bakker, A. B., & De Vries, J. D. (2020). Job Demands–Resources theory and selfregulation: new explanations and remedies for job burnout. Anxiety, Stress & Coping, 34(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2020.1797695
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The Job Demands-Resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309-328. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Verbeke, W. (2004). Using the job demands-resources model to predict burnout and performance. Human Resource Management, 43(1), 83-104. https://doi.org/10.1002/HRM.20004
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Breevaart, K., & Bakker, A. B. (2018). Daily job demands and employee work engagement: The role of daily transformational leadership behavior. Journal of occupational health psychology, 23(3), 338. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000082
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Darouei, M., & Pluut, H. (2021). Work from home today for a better tomorrow! How working from home influences work-family conflict and employees’ start of the next workday. Stress and Health, 37(5), 986-999. https://doi.org/10.1002/SMI.3053
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Delanoeije, J., & Verbruggen, M. (2020). Between-person and within-person effects of telework: a quasi-field experiment. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 29(6), 795-808. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2020.1774557
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 499-512. https://psycnet.apa.org/buy/2001-06715-012
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Fernet, C., Austin, S., Trépanier, S. G., & Dussault, M. (2013). How do job characteristics contribute to burnout? Exploring the distinct mediating roles of perceived autonomy, competence, and relatedness. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 22(2), 123-137. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2011.632161
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Galanti, T., Guidetti, G., Mazzei, E., Zappalà, S., & Toscano, F. (2021). Work From Home During the COVID-19 Outbreak: The Impact on Employees’ Remote Work Productivity, Engagement, and Stress. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 63(7), e426. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000002236
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Gan, J., Zhou, Z. E., Tang, H., Ma, H., & Gan, Z. (2022). What it takes to be an effective “remote leader” during COVID-19 crisis: The combined effects of supervisor control and support behaviors. The International Journal of Human Resource Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2022.2079953
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Gerards, R., De Grip, A., & Baudewijns, C. (2018). Do new ways of working increase work engagement? Personnel Review, 47(2), 517-534. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-02-2017-0050
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Gerards, R., Van Wetten, S., & Van Sambeek, C. (2021). New ways of working and intrapreneurial behaviour: the mediating role of transformational leadership and social interaction. Review of Managerial Science, 15(7), 2075-2110. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11846-020-00412-1
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Hildenbrand, K., Sacramento, C. A., & Binnewies, C. (2018). Transformational leadership and burnout: The role of thriving and followers’ openness to experience. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 23(1), 31-43. https://doi.org/10.1037/OCP0000051
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Hill, E. J., Hawkins, A. J., Ferris, M., & Weitzman, M. (2001). Finding an extra day a week: The positive influence of perceived job flexibility on work and family life balance. Family relations, 50(1), 49-58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.17413729.2001.00049.x
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Houghton, R., Lister, D., & Majumdar, A. (2021). Examining cognitive workload during Covid-19: A qualitative study. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 1493 CCIS, 136-150. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91408-0_9
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Ipsen, C., Van Veldhoven, M., Kirchner, K., & Hansen, J. P. (2021). Six key advantages and disadvantages of working from home in Europe during COVID-19. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(4), 1826. https://doi.org/10.3390/IJERPH18041826
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Kalter, M. J. O., Geurs, K. T., & Wismans, L. (2021). Post COVID-19 teleworking and car use intentions. Evidence from large scale GPS-tracking and survey data in the Netherlands. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 12, 100498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2021.100498
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Kanat-Maymon, Y., Mor, Y., Gottlieb, E., & Shoshani, A. (2017). Supervisor motivating styles and legitimacy: moderation and mediation models. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 32(8), 561-580. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-01-2017-0043
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Karasek, R., Brisson, C., Kawakami, N., Houtman, I., Bongers, P., & Amick, B. (1998). The Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ): An instrument for internationally comparative assessments of psychosocial job characteristics. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 3(4), 322-355. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.3.4.322
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Karl, K. A., Peluchette, J. V., & Aghakhani, N. (2022). Virtual Work Meetings During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Good, Bad, and Ugly. Small Group Research, 53(3), 343-365. https://doi.org/10.1177/10464964211015286
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Kotera, Y., & Vione, K. C. (2020). Psychological impacts of the New Ways of Working (NWW): A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(14), 5080. https://doi.org/10.3390/IJERPH17145080
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Lindblom, K. M., Linton, S. J., Fedeli, C., & Bryngelsson, I.-L. (2006). Burnout in the working population: relations to psychosocial work factors. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 13(1), 51-59. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327558IJBM1301_7
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Ministerie van Infrastructuur en Waterstaat (2023). Landelijk reizigersonderzoek 2022. Projectnummer IW077.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Molino, M., Ingusci, E., Signore, F., Manuti, A., Giancaspro, M. L., Russo, V., Zito, M., & Cortese, C. G. (2020). Wellbeing costs of technology use during Covid-19 remote working: An investigation using the Italian translation of the technostress creators scale. Sustainability, 12(15), 5911. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12155911
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Morgeson, F. P., Delaney-Klinger, K., & Hemingway, M. A. (2005). The importance of job autonomy, cognitive ability, and job-related skill for predicting role breadth and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(2), 399-406. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.2.399
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Nederlandse Organisatie voor toegpast-natuurwetenschappelijk onderzoek (2022). Vier op de tien werkgevers vindt werkdruk een van de belangrijkste arbeidsrisico’s. Leiden: TNO. https://www.tno.nl/nl/newsroom/2022/11/werkgevers-werkdrukarbeidsrisico/
     [Google Scholar]
  32. O’Connor, R. C., Wetherall, K., Cleare, S., McClelland, H., Melson, A. J., Niedzwiedz, C. L., O’Carroll, R. E., O’Connor, D. B., Platt, S., Scowcroft, E., Watson, B., Zortea, T., Ferguson, E., & Robb, K. A. (2021). Mental health and well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic: Longitudinal analyses of adults in the UK COVID-19 Mental Health Wellbeing study. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 218(6), 326-333. https://doi.org/10.1192/BJP.2020.212
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Parent-Lamarche, A. (2022). Teleworking, work engagement, and intention to quit during the COVID-19 pandemic: Same storm, different boats?International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(3), 1267. https://doi.org/10.3390/IJERPH19031267
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Peijen, R., Harekeh, Z., Niks, I., Brouwer, C., Hooftman, W., & Oude Hengel, K. (2022). De effecten van langdurig thuiswerken gedurende de coronapandemie op de gezondheid. TNO. https://www.monitorarbeid.tno.nl/nl-nl/publicaties/effecten-van-langdurig-thuiswerken/
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Peters, P., Poutsma, E., Van der Heijden, B. I. J. M., Bakker, A. B., & De Bruijn, T. (2014). Enjoying New Ways to Work: An HRM-Process Approach to Study Flow. Human Resource Management, 53(2), 271-290. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21588
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879-891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Shockley, K. M., Allen, T. D., Dodd, H., & Waiwood, A. M. (2021). Remote Worker Communication During COVID-19: The Role of Quantity, Quality, and Supervisor Expectation-Setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(10), 1466-1482. https://doi.org/10.1037/APL0000970
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Skakon, J., Nielsen, K., Borg, V., & Guzman, J. (2010). Are leaders’ well-being, behaviours and style associated with the affective well-being of their employees? A systematic review of three decades of research. Work & Stress, 24(2), 107-139. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2010.495262
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Slavković, M., Sretenović, S., & Bugarčić, M. (2021). Remote Working for Sustainability of Organization during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Mediator-Moderator Role of Social Support. Sustainability, 14(1), 70. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU14010070
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Solms, L., Van Vianen, A., Koen, J., Theeboom, T., De Pagter, A. P. J., & De Hoog, M. (2021). Turning the tide: a quasi-experimental study on a coaching intervention to reduce burn-out symptoms and foster personal resources among medical residents and specialists in the Netherlands. BMJ Open, 11(1), e041708. https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJOPEN-2020-041708
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Ting, D. S. W., Carin, L., Dzau, V., & Wong, T. Y. (2020). Digital technology and COVID-19. Nature Medicine, 26(4), 459-461. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-0824-5
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Toscano, F., & Zappalà, S. (2020). Social isolation and stress as predictors of productivity perception and remote work satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic: The role of concern about the virus in a moderated double mediation. Sustainability, 12(23), 9804. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12239804
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Turja, T., Krutova, O., & Melin, H. (2022). Telework and perceived workload: Learnings prior to the COVID-19 upheaval. Human Systems Management, 41(2), 251-255. https://doi.org/10.3233/HSM-211567
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Van Leeuwen, E. H., Kuyvenhoven, J. P., Taris, T. W., & Verhagen, M. A. M. T. (2022). Burn-out and employability rates are impacted by the level of job autonomy and workload among Dutch gastroenterologists. United European Gastroenterology Journal, 10(3), 296-307. https://doi.org/10.1002/UEG2.12211
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Van der Velden, P. G., Hyland, P., Contino, C., Von Gaudecker, H.-M., Muffels, R., & Das, M. (2021). Anxiety and depression symptoms, the recovery from symptoms, and loneliness before and after the COVID-19 outbreak among the general population: Findings from a Dutch population-based longitudinal study. PLOS ONE, 16(1), e0245057. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245057
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Van der Zee, K., & Sanderman, R. (1993). Het meten van de algemene gezondheidstoestand met de RAND-36: een handleiding. Northern Centre for Health Care Research, University of Groningen, the Netherlands.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Wang, B., Liu, Y., Qian, J., & Parker, S. K. (2021). Achieving Effective Remote Working During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A work design perspective. Applied Psychology, 70(1), 16-59. https://doi.org/10.1111/APPS.12290
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Wielers, R., Hummel, L., & Van der Meer, P. (2021). Career insecurity and burnout complaints of young Dutch workers. Journal of Education and Work, 35(2), 227-240. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2021.2018412
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Wynen, J., & Op de Beeck, S. (2014). The impact of the financial and economic crisis on turnover intention in the US federal government. Public Personnel Management, 43(4), 565-585. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091026014537
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Yerkes, M. A., André, S. C. H., Besamusca, J. W., Kruyen, P. M., Remery, C. L. H. S., Van der Zwan, R., Beckers, D. G. J., & Geurts, S. A. E. (2020). ‘Intelligent’ lockdown, intelligent effects? Results from a survey on gender (in)equality in paid work, the division of childcare and household work, and quality of life among parents in the Netherlands during the Covid-19 lockdown. PLOS ONE, 15(11), e0242249. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242249
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.5117/TVA2023.2.005.PEIJ
Loading
Thuiswerken en burn-outklachten: De rol van autonomie, werkdruk en leidinggevenden
TA 39, 193 (2023); https://doi.org/10.5117/TVA2023.2.005.PEIJ
/content/journals/10.5117/TVA2023.2.005.PEIJ
/content/journals/10.5117/TVA2023.2.005.PEIJ
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Keyword(s): burnout symptoms; COVID-19 pandemic; panel study; work-from-home

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error