2004
Volume 41, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 0169-2216
  • E-ISSN: 2468-9424

Abstract

Samenvatting

In dit artikel onderzoeken we het effect van flexibel werken op werk-privéconflict en psychische vermoeidheid. Startpunt is de flexibiliteitsparadox, die stelt dat flexibel kunnen werken, naar plaats en tijd, een positief effect heeft op het welbevinden van mensen, maar ook het werk-privé-conflict verhoogt. Het onderzoek op basis van de paradox laat zien dat mensen meer uren gaan werken als ze veel autonomie hebben. We leiden daaruit af dat arbeidsflexibiliteit wellicht bijdraagt aan het hoge niveau van psychische vermoeidheid in Nederland. We toetsen het effect van flexibiliteit op werk-privéconflict en op psychische vermoeidheid met data uit de Nationale Enquête Arbeidsomstandigheden (NEA). De resultaten verschillen voor verschillende vormen van flexibiliteit. Wanneer mensen zelf kunnen bepalen op welke uren ze werken, verrichten ze minder overwerk, ervaren ze minder werkdruk, en zijn werk-privéconflict en psychische vermoeidheid laag. Als ze meer thuis werken, verrichten mensen meer overwerk, ervaren ze hogere werkdruk, en zijn werk-privéconflict en psychische vermoeidheid hoger. Het meer thuis werken draagt dus bij aan de verklaring van psychische vermoeidheid in Nederland.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/TVA2025.2.002.MEER
2025-08-01
2025-08-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Akerlof, G. (1982). Labour Contracts as as Partial Gift Exchange. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 97, 543-559.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Andrulli, R., & Gerards, R. (2023). How new ways of working during COVID-19 affect employee well-being via technostress, need for recovery, and work engagement. Computers in Human Behavior, 139, 107560. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107560
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Beauregard, T. A., Basile, K. A., & Canónico, E. (2019). Telework: outcomes and facilitators for employees. In R. N.Landers (Red.), The Cambridge Handbook of Technology and Employee Behavior (pp. 511-543). Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/gb/academic/subjects/psychology/applied-psychology/cambridge-handbook-technology-and-employee-behavior?format=PB
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bröckling, U. (2015). The entrepreneurial self : Fabricating a new type of subject. SAGE Publications, Limited. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/rug/detail.action?docID=5569682
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek. (2024a). DANS Nationale Enquête Arbeidsomstandigheden meerjaren bestand 2014-2022 (Version V1). DANS Data Station Social Sciences and Humanities. https://doi.org/doi:10.17026/SS/E04TEO
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek. (2024b). Emancipatiemonitor 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Centraal Planbureau. (2023). Kerngegevens arbeidsmarkt 1970-2028, bijlage 10 cMEV.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Chung, H. (2022). The flexibility paradox. Policy Press, an imprint of Bristol University Press, University of Bristol. https://doi.org/10.46692/9781447354796
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Chung, H., & Tijdens, K. (2013). Working time flexibility components and working time regimes in Europe: using company-level data across 21 countries. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(7), 1418-1434.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Chung, H., & Van der Horst, M. (2020). Flexible Working and Unpaid Overtime in the UK: The Role of Gender, Parental and Occupational Status. Social Indicators Research, 151(2), 495-520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-018-2028-7
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Chung, H., & Van der Lippe, T. (2020). Flexible Working, Work–Life Balance, and Gender Equality: Introduction. Social Indicators Research, 151(2), 365-381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-018-2025-x
    [Google Scholar]
  12. De Bloom, J., Syrek, C. J., Kühnel, J., & Vahle-Hinz, T. (2022). Unlimited Paid Time Off Policies: Unlocking the Best and Unleashing the Beast. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.812187
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Dirven, H.-J. (2023). Statistieken over thuiswerken voor, tijdens en na corona. Tijdschrift voor Arbeidsvraagstukken, 39(2), 142-154. https://doi.org/10.5117/TVA2023.2.002.DIRV
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Green, F., Felstead, A., Gallie, D., & Henseke, G. (2022). Working Still Harder. Industrial & labor relations review, 75(2), 458-487. https://doi.org/10.1177/0019793920977850
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Grund, C., & Sliwka, D. (2005). Envy and Compassion in Tournaments. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 14(1), 187-207. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1430-9134.2005.00039.x
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Josten, E., Peters, P., & Merens, A. (2023). De impact van thuiswerken op arbeidscondities, werknemersbeleving en verloopintentie: Een panelstudie. Tijdschrift voor Arbeidsvraagstukken, 39(2), 155-179. https://doi.org/10.5117/TVA2023.2.003.JOST
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Karasek, R. A. (1979). Job demands, job decision latitude, and implications for job redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 285-307.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Kelliher, C., & Anderson, D. (2010). Doing more with less? Flexible working practices and the intensification of work. Human Relations, 63(1), 83-106.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Landers, R. M., Rebitzer, J. B., & Taylor, L. J. (1996). Rat Race Redux: Adverse Selection in the Determination of Work Hours in Law Firms. American Economic Review, 86(3), 329-348.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Lazear, E. P., & Gibbs, M. (2009). Personnel Economics in Practice (2e ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Lott, Y. (2020). Does Flexibility Help Employees Switch Off from Work? Flexible Working-Time Arrangements and Cognitive Work-to-Home Spillover for Women and Men in Germany. Social Indicators Research, 151(2), 471-494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-018-2031-z
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Maslach, C. (2003). Job burnout: New directions in research and intervention. Current directions in psychological science, 12(5), 189-192.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Maslach, C., Leiter, M. P., & Schaufeli, W. (2008). 86 Measuring Burnout. In S.Cartwright, & C. L.Cooper (Reds.), The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Well Being (pp. 86-108). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/ox-fordhb/9780199211913.003.0005
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Mazmanian, M., Orlikowski, W. J., & Yates, J. (2013). The Autonomy Paradox: The Implications of Mobile Email Devices for Knowledge Professionals. Organization Science (Providence, R.I.), 24(5), 1337-1357. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0806
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Peijen, R., & Gerards, R. (2023). Thuiswerken en burn-outklachten: De rol van autonomie, werkdruk en leidinggevenden. Tijdschrift voor Arbeidsvraagstukken, 39(2), 193-218. https://doi.org/10.5117/TVA2023.2.005.PEIJ
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Peters, P., & Batenburg, R. (2015). Telework adoption and formalisation in organisations from a knowledge transfer perspective. International Journal of Work Innovation, 1(3), 251-270.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Peters, P., & Blomme, R. J. (2019). Forget about ‘the ideal worker’: A theoretical contribution to the debate on flexible workplace designs, work/life conflict, and opportunities for gender equality. Business Horizons, 62, 603-613.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Peters, P., & Van der Lippe, T. (2007). The time-pressure reducing potential of telehomeworking: the Dutch case. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(3), 430-447. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190601167730
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Peters, P., Wetzels, C., & Tijdens, K. (2008). Telework: Timesaving or time-consuming? An investigation into actual working hours. Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics, 19(4), 421-442.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Pongratz, H. J., & Voß, G. G. (2003). From employee to ‘entreployee’ towards a ‘self-entrepreneurial’ work force?Concepts & Transformation, 8(3), 239-254. https://doi.org/10.1075/cat.8.3.04pon
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Sjögren Lindquist, G. (2010). Tournaments and unfair treatment. Journal of Socioeconomics, 39(6), 670-682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2010.06.001
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Van den Heuvel, S. G., Fernandez Beiro, L., & Van Dam, L. M. C. (2023). Nationale Enquête Arbeidsomstandigheden 2022: Resultaten in vogelvlucht. https://www.cbs.nl/nl-nl/achtergrond/2023/16/nea-2022-resultaten-in-vogelvlucht
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Van der Meer, P. (2024). Home-office, Covid-19 and Subjective Well-being. In Home-office, Covid-19 and Subjective Well-being (Vol. 2024006-OB). Groningen: University of Groningen, FEB Research Institute.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Van Echtelt, P., Glebbeek, A., Lewis, S., & Lindenberg, S. (2009). Post-Fordist work: a man’s world? Gender and working overtime in the Netherlands. Gender and Society, 23(2), 188-214.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Wall, G. (2010). Mothers’ experiences with intensive parenting and brain development discourse. Women’s studies international forum, 33(3), 253-263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2010.02.019
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Wiß, T. (2017). Paths towards Family-friendly Working Time Arrangements: Comparing Workplaces in Different Countries and Industries. Social Policy & Administration, 51(7), 1406-1430. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12270
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Wöhrmann, A. M., & Ebner, C. (2021). Understanding the bright side and the dark side of telework: An empirical analysis of working conditions and psychosomatic health complaints. New Technology, Work and Employment, n/a. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12208
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.5117/TVA2025.2.002.MEER
Loading
/content/journals/10.5117/TVA2025.2.002.MEER
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error