2004
Volume 41, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 0169-2216
  • E-ISSN: 2468-9424

Abstract

Samenvatting

In dit artikel worden de conceptuele, theoretische, methodologische en praktische beslissingen gepresenteerd die ten grondslag liggen aan een diagnostisch instrument waarmee teamleiders in de zorg samen met hun teamleden de feitelijke werkdruk in kaart kunnen brengen. Vervolgens worden deze vergeleken met de beslissingen die ten grondslag liggen aan vragenlijsten die gebaseerd zijn op het Job Demand-Control-model (JD-C), het Job Demands-Resources-model (JD-R) en het Demand-Induced Strain Compensation-model (DISC). Vergeleken worden de kenmerken en problemen van deze modellen en de wijze waarop deze problemen opgelost worden in het werkdrukinstrument. Geconcludeerd wordt dat ten opzichte van het JD-C-model het werkdrukinstrument een vooruitgang is en het JD-R- en DISC-model een achteruitgang zijn.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/TVA2025.2.008.CHRI
2025-08-01
2025-08-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adcock, R., & Collier, D. (2001). Measurement Validity: A Shared Standard for Qualitative and Quantitative Research. The American Political Science Review, 95(3), 529-546.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Ashby, W. R. (1964). An introduction to cybernetics. Methuan & Co.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job Demands–Resources theory: taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273-285.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bollen, K., & Lenox, R. (1991). Conventional Wisdom on Measurement: A Structural Equation Perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 110(2), 305-314.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Borsboom, D. (2019). Netwerkbenaderingen van psychopathologie. Gedragstherapie, 52(1), 18-42.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G., & Van Heerden, J. (2004) The concept of validity. Psychological Review, 111(4), 1061-1071.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bova, J., De Jonge, J., & Guglielmi, D. (2015). The Demand-Induced Strain Compensation Questionnaire: A Cross-national Validation Study. Stress and Health, 31(3), 236-244.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Christis, J. (1998). Arbeid, organisatie en stress. Het Spinhuis.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Christis, J., Achterbergh, J., & Van Laar, H. (2018). Multidimensionaal organiseren: is dat slim?Management & Organisatie, 2018, nr. 1, 4-29.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Crawford, E. R., LePine, J. A., & Rich, B. L. (2010). Linking job demands and resources to employee engagement and burnout: a theoretical extension and meta-analytic test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(5), 834–848.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Christis. J., Huizing, M., Moesker, H., Kersjes, R., Nijenkamp, N., & Soepenberg, E. (2019). Werkdrukinstrument voor de zorg. Marian van Os Centre of Expertise.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. De Jonge, J., Dormann, C., & Van Vegchel, N. (2004). Taakeisen, hulpbronnen en psychische gezondheid: het Demand-Induced-Strain-Compensation (DISC)- Model. Gedrag en Organisatie, 17(1), 59-79.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. De Sitter, L. U. (1998). Synergetisch produceren. Van Gorcum.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Demerouti, E., & Bakker, A. B. (2011). The Job Demands–Resources model: challenges for future research. Journal of Industrial Psychology, 37(2), e1-e9.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Frese, M., & Semmer, N. (1987). Stress. In D.Frei, & S.Greif (Reds.), Sozialpsychologie (pp. 342-350). Psychologie Verlag Union.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Frese, M., & Zapf, D. (1988). Methodological issues in the study of work stress. In C.Cooper, & R.Payne (Reds.), Causes, coping and consequences of stress at work (pp. 375-411). Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Frijda, N. H. (2007). The laws of emotion. Psychology Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Garfinkel, A. (1981). Forms of Explanation. Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Goertz, G. (2020). Social science concepts and measurement. Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Goertz, G., & Mahoney, J. (2013). A Tale of Two Cultures: Qualitative and Quantitative Research in the Social Sciences. Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Gould, S. (1996) The Mismeasure of Man. Norton & Company.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Hacker, W. (1980). Algemeine Arbeits- und Ingenieurspsychologie. Verlag der Wissenschaften.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Hacker, W., Iwanowa, A., & Richter, P. (1983). Tätigkeisbewertungssystem. Psychodiagnostisches Zentrum.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Herman, J. L. (1992). Trauma and Recovery. Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Humphreys, P. (1989). The Chances of Explanation. Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Karasek, R. A. (1979). Job Demands, Job Decision Latitude, and Mental Strain: Implications for Job Redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(2), 285-308.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Karasek, R. A. (1989). Control in the workplace and its health-related aspects. In S.Sauter, J.Hurrell, & C.Cooper (Reds.), Job control and worker health (pp. 129-160). Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Karasek, R. A., & Theorell, T. (1990). Healthy work. Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Karasek, R. A., Brisson, C., Kawakami, N., Houtman, I., & Bongers, P. (1998). The Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ): An Instrument for Internationally Comparative Assessments of Psychosocial Job Characteristics. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 3(4), 322-355.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Lazarus, R. S. (1995). Psychological stress in the workplace. In R.Crandall, & P.Perrewé (Reds.), Occupational Stress (pp. 3-14). Taylor and Francis
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Leitner, K., Volpert, W., Greiner, B., Weber, W. G., & Hennes, K. (1987). Analyse psychischer Belastung in der Arbeit. Das RHIA-Verfahren. Handbuch und Manual. TÜV-Rheinland.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Markus, K., & Borsboom, D. (2013). Frontiers of Test Validity Theory. Measurement, Causation, and Meaning. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. McClelland, G. H., & Judd, C. M. (1993). Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects. Psychological Bulletin, 114(2), 376-390.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Oesterreich, R., Leitner, K., & Resch, M. (2000). Analyse psychischer Anforderungen und Belastungen in der Produktionsarbeit. Das Verfahren RHIA/VERA-Produktion. Handbuch. Hogrefe.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Ong, W. J., & Johnson, M. D. (2023). Toward a Configural Theory of Job Demands and Resources. Academy of Management Journal, 66(1), 195-221.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Pawson, R. (1989). A Measure for Measures. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Projectgroep WEBA (1989). Functieverbetering en organisatie van de arbeid. Directoraat-Generaal van de Arbeid.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Sauter, S., Hurrell, J., & Cooper, C. (Reds.). Job control and worker health. Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Schaufeli, W. B. (2017). Applying the Job Demands-Resources Model: a “how to” guide to measuring and tackling work engagement and burnout. Organizational Dynamics, 46(2), 120-132.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: a multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 293-315.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Schaufeli, W. B., & Taris, T. (2013). Het job demands-resources model: Overzicht en kritische beschouwing. Gedrag & Organisatie, 26(2), 182-204.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Steptoe, A., & Appels, A. (Reds.) (1989). Stress, personal control and health. Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Van Vianen, A. (2018). Person-Environment Fit: A Review of Its Basic Tenets. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5(1), 75-101.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Volpert, W., Oesterreich, R., Gablenz-Kolakovic, S., Krogoll, T., & Resch, M. (1983). Verfahren zur Ermittlung von Regulationserfordernissen in der Arbeitstätigkeit (VERA). Handbuch und Manual. TÜV Rheinland.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Van Bork, R., Wijsen, L. D. & Rhemtulla, M. (2017). Toward a causal interpretation of the common factor model. Disputatio, 9(47), 581-601.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Weick, K. (1995) Sensemaking in Organizations. Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.5117/TVA2025.2.008.CHRI
Loading
/content/journals/10.5117/TVA2025.2.008.CHRI
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error