Onderwijs als filosofisch strijdperk: van polarisatie naar pluralisme en planetair bewustzijn

References

1. Appadurai, A. (1996) Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bonjour, S., van den Brink, M., & Taartmans, G. (2020) Een Diversity Officer Is Niet Genoeg TH&MA27 (5), pp. 83-89.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek (2023) Internationals: clusteranalyse Eindhoven 2023. https://www.cbs.nl/nl-nl/maatwerk/2025/38/internationals-clusteranalyse-eindhoven-2023. Geraadpleegd op 21november2025.
4. Goldin, J., & Suransky, C. (2024) Decolonisation of Education through Citizen Science: Slow Science, Not Slow Violence. The Case Study Diamonds on the Soles of Their Feet, Journal of Education95, pp. 126-147.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Goldin, J., & Suransky, C. (2024) Pedagogy with a Heartbeat: The Transformative Potential of Citizen Science in Education, Perspectives in Education42(2), pp. 110–127.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Goldin, J., Suransky, C., & Kanyerere, T. (2023) Keep the Flow: Citizen Science as Agonistic Learning, Citizen science: Theory and Practice8(1), Article 5.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Jansen, J. D. (2004) The Politics of Salvation: Values, Ideology and the South African National Curriculum, Verbum et Ecclesia25(2), pp. 784–806.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Kessels, J. W. M. (2001) Learning in Organizations: A Corporate Curriculum for the Knowledge Economy. Twente University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Latour, B. (2004) Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Latour, B. (2015) Face à Gaïa: Huit Conférences sur le Nouveau Régime Climatique. Paris: La Découverte.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Latour, B., & Weibel, P. (Eds.). (2020) Critical Zones: The Science and Politics of Landing on Earth. MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Lovelock, J. E., & Margulis, L. (1979) Gaia: A New Look at Life on Earth. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Lugones, M. (2023) The coloniality of gender, in: L.De Souza Lima, E.Otero Quezada, & J.Roth (reds.), Feminisms in Movement: Theories and Practices from the AmericasBielefeld: transcript Verlag, pp. 35–58.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Manschot, H., & Suransky, C. (2021) Humanisme in de 21e eeuw: naar een nieuw kosmologisch, pluralistisch en verbindend narratief, in: H.Alma & C.Suransky (reds.), Verwevenheid: Essays over een Verbindend Humanisme. VUB Press, pp. 45–64.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Mbembe, A. (2022) The Earthly Community: Reflections on the Last Utopia. V2 Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Mignolo, W. D. (2002) The Geopolitics of Knowledge and the Colonial Difference, South Atlantic Quarterly101(1), pp. 57–96.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Mignolo, W. & Walsh, C. (2018) On Decoloniality: Concepts, Analytics, Praxis. Durham: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Mouffe, C. (2005) On the Political. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Partij voor de Vrijheid. (2023) Nederlanders weer op 1 [verkiezingsprogramma].
    [Google Scholar]
20. Smith, D. (2025, 30maart) ‘It reminds you of a fascist state’: Smithsonian Institution braces for Trump rewrite of US history. The Guardian.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Suransky, C., & Alma, H. (2018). An Agonistic Model of Dialogue, Journal of Constructivist Psychology31(1), pp. 22–38.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Suransky, C., & Bot, N. (2025) Decolonizing the curriculum: dialogical work towards epistemic justice in higher education, in: G.van der Laan, T.Leesen en G.Keppens (reds.) Tilburg Series in Academic Education: Knowledge, Skills, Character. Tilburg University, pp. 142-156.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Suransky, C., & Manschot, H. (2026) Reframing humanistic education in the Anthropocene: ideas inspired by Bruno Latour’s philosophy, in: In D.de Ruyter & C.Suransky (reds.), Education for Transformation. Humanistic Perspectives on Flourishing in the Anthropocene. Brill.
    [Google Scholar]