Anika van der Klis. Caregiver-infant interactions and child vocabulary. A large-scale, longitudinal study of dyadic and multimodal behaviours. Amsterdam: LOT, 2024. 240 blz. €36.

References

1. Fenson, L. et al. (2007). The MacArthur Communicative Development Inventories: User’s Guide and Technical Manual (Tweede editie). Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co., Inc.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Gustafson, J. & K.Sjölander. Voice transformations for improving children’s speech recognition in a publicly available dialogue system. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, ISCA, Denver, CO, USA, 16–20September2002, 297–300.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Kitamura, C. et al. (2001). Universality and specificity in infant-directed speech: Pitch modifications as a function of infant age and sex in a tonal and non-tonal language. Infant Behavior and Development24, 372-392.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Klis, A.van der, F. Adriaans & R.Kager (2023). Infants’ behaviours elicit different verbal, nonverbal, and multimodal responsens from caregivers during early play. Infant Behavior and Development71, 101828.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Klis, A. van der et al. (2024). Examining Dutch children’s vocabularies across infancy and toddlerhood: Demographic effects are age-specific and task-specific. Journal of Child Language. Online gepubliceerd 1-20, doi:10.1017/S0305000924000199
   [Google Scholar]
6. Klis, A. van der et al. (2025). The role of dyadic combinations of infants’ behaviors and caregivers’ verbal and multimodal responses in predicting vocabulary outcomes. Infancy30, e12626.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Onland-Moret, N.C. et al. (2020). The YOUth study: Rationale, design, and study procedures. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience46, 10068.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Renzi, D.T. et al. (2017). Two minds are better than one: Cooperative communication as a ne framework for understanding infant language learning. Translational Issues in Psychological Science3, 19-33.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Wu, Z. & J.Gros-Louis (2015). Caregivers provide more labeling responses to infants’ pointing than to infants’ object-directed vocalizations. Journal of Child Language42, 538-561.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Zink, I. & M.Lejaegere (2002). N-CDI’s: Lijsten voor Communicatieve Ontwikkeling. Aanpassing en hernormering van de MacArthur CDI’s van Fenson et al. Den Haag: Acco.
    [Google Scholar]