2004
Volume 52, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 1876-9071
  • E-ISSN: 2214-5729

Abstract

Abstract

Despite the fact that linguistic contact phenomena have been observed in various cities across the Netherlands and Flanders, it may be imprudent to label these phenomena with names such as , and recently . We argue that these labels, in particular , so far have functioned as floating signifiers that are variably attributed to a wide range of different linguistic targets such as imitations of accented Dutch, learner Dutch or even competent fluent Dutch. We suggest that these signifiers do not so much hint at the existence of new separate urban varieties of language, but rather offer clues for how speakers navigate linguistic complexity and difference in contemporary cities, and what language use may come to be seen as normal, attractive and worth pursuing in the future.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/IN2014.3.JASP
2014-10-01
2021-12-03
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/18769071/52/3/s1.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5117/IN2014.3.JASP&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/IN2014.3.JASP
Loading
/content/journals/10.5117/IN2014.3.JASP
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): contextualization; foreigner talk; Illegal; labelling; Murks; street language
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error