oa Aanwezig en afwezig

References

1. Bateman Novaes, S.(1998). The medical management of donor insemination. In K.Daniels & E.Haimes (Eds.), Donor insemination: International social science perspectives (pp. 105-130). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bishop, M.C., & Atlas, J.G.(2015). School curriculum, policies, and practices regarding lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender families. Education and Urban Society, 47, 766-784.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bower, L.A.(2008). Standing up for diversity: Lesbian mothers’ suggestions for teachers. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 44, 181-183.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Casper, V., & Schultz, S.(1999). Gay parents/straight schools: Building communication and trust. New York, NY: Teacher’s College Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Daniels, K.(2002). Toward a family-building approach to donor insemination. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, 24, 17-21.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Daniels, K.(2006). Is blood really thicker than water? Assisted reproduction and its impact on our thinking about family. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology, 26, 265-270.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Daniels, K., & Thorn, P.(2001). Sharing information with donor insemination offspring: A child-conception versus a family-building approach. Human Reproduction,16, 1792-1796.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Daniels, K.R., Kramer, W., & Perez-y-Perez, M.V.(2012). Semen donors who are open to contact with their offspring: Issues and implications for them and their families. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 25, 670-677.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Donor Conception Network(2014). The young people’s panel share their experiences and thoughts on our new publication and more. Donor Conception Network Journal, 10, 7-12.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Donor Conception Network(2017). Five go to Bristol. Donor Conception Network Journal, 17, 8-13.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Donor Conception Network(2018). Primary Schools Resources (for parents, children and teachers). Geraadpleegd via https://www.dcnetwork.org/products/product/primary-schools-resources-parents-children-and-teachers
    [Google Scholar]
12. ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law(2002). Gamete and embryo donation. Human Reproduction, 17, 1407-1408.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Freeman, T., Graham, S., Ebtehaj, F., & Richards, M.(2014). Relatedness in assisted reproduction: Families, origins and identities. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Gay, Lesbian, and Straight Education Network & Harris Interactive (GLSEN). (2008). The principal’s perspective: School safety, bullying and harassment. A survey of public school principals. New York, NY: Gay, Lesbian, and Straight Education Network.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A.(1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, USA: Aldine Publishing Company.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Goldberg, A.E, & Smith, J.Z.(2014). Preschool selection considerations and experiences of school-mistreatment among lesbian, gay, and heterosexual adoptive parents. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 29, 64-75. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2013.09.006
    [Google Scholar]
17. Golombok, S.(2015). Modern Families. Parents and children in new family forms. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Haimes, E., & Daniels, K.(1998). International social science perspectives on donor insemination: an introduction. In K.Daniels & E.Haimes E (Eds.), Donor Insemination: International Social Science Perspectives (pp. 1-6). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Hennink, M., Hutter, I., & Bailey, A.(2011). Qualitative research methods. London, UK: SAGE Publications Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Hudson, N., Culley, L., Rapport, F., Johnson, M., & Bharadwaj, A.(2009). “Public” perceptions of gamete donation: A research review. Public Understanding of Science, 18, 61-77. doi:10.1177/0963662507078396
    [Google Scholar]
21. Indekeu, A., & Bastiaansen, L.(2016). Donorconceptie: Lespakket voor de 3de graad ASO/TSO. Ongepubliceerd lesmateriaal te verkrijgen via [email protected]
    [Google Scholar]
22. Indekeu, A., & Lampic, C. (ingediend). Societal perceptions on donor-conceived families: The perspective of school teachers.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Isaksson, S., Skoog Svanberg, A., Sydsjö, G., Thurin-Kjellberg, A., Karlström, P.O., Solensten, N.G., & Lampic, C.(2011). Two decades after legislation on identifiable donors in Sweden: Are recipient couples ready to be open about using gamete donation?Human Reproduction, 26, 853-860. doi:10.1093/humrep/deq365.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Kintner-Duffy, V.L., Vardell, R., Lower, J.K., & Cassidy, D.J.(2012). “The changers and the changed”: Preparing early childhood teachers to work with lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender families. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 33,208-223.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Lamme, L.L., & Lamme, L.A.(2002). Welcoming children from gay families into our schools. Educational Leadership, 59(4), 65-69. Geraadpleegd via www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership.aspx
    [Google Scholar]
26. Leemans, L. (1 januari 2016). Je leerlingen groeien niet op in een traditioneel gezin. Klasse. Geraadpleegd via www.klasse.be
    [Google Scholar]
27. Lindsay, J., Perlesz, A., Brown, R., McNair, R., De Vaus, D., & Pitts, M.(2006). Stigma or respect: Lesbian-parented families negotiating school settings. Sociology, 40, 1059-1077.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Nachtigall, R., Tschann, J., Quiroga, S.S., Pitcher, L., & Becker, G.(1997). Stigma, disclosure, and family functioning among parents of children conceived through donor insemination. Fertility and Sterility, 68, 83-89.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Nijs, P., & Rouffa, L.(1975). A.I.D.-couples: Psychological and psychopathological evaluation. Andrologia, 7, 187-194. x
    [Google Scholar]
30. Nuffield Council on Bioethics(2013). Donor conception: Ethical aspects of information sharing. Geraadpleegd via nuffieldbioethics.org/project/donor-conception
    [Google Scholar]
31. Persaud, S., Freeman, T., Jadva, V., Slutsky, J., Kramer, W., Steele, M., … & Golombok, S.(2017). Adolescents conceived through donor insemination in mother-headed families: A qualitative study of motivations and experiences of contacting and meeting same-donor offspring. Children & Society, 31, 13-22. doi:0.1111/chso.12158
    [Google Scholar]
32. Ray, V., & Gregory, R.(2001). School experiences of the children of lesbian and gay parents. Family Matters, 59, 28-34. Geraadpleegd via https://aifs.gov.au/publications/family-matters
    [Google Scholar]
33. Robinson, K.H.(2002). Making the invisible visible: Gay and lesbian issues in early childhood education. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 3, 415-434.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Ryan, D.P., & Martin, A.(2000). Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender parents in the school systems. School Psychology Review, 29, 10.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Schoysman, R., & Schoysman-Deboeck, A.(1980). Present status of donor insemination in Belgium. In G.David & W.S.Price (Eds.), Human artificial insemination and semen preservation (pp. 27-29). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Sijbers, R., Elfering, S., Lubbers, M., Scheepers, P., & Wolbers, M.(2015). Maatschappelijke thema’s in de klas: Hoe moeilijk is dat?Nijmegen: ITS, Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen. Geraadpleegd via its.ruhosting.nl/publicaties/pdf/r2033.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
37. Taymans, J.M., Marotta, S.A., Lynch, S.J., Riley, D.B., Oritz, D.M., LaFauci Schutt, J.M. … & EmbichJ.L.(2008). Adoption as a diversity issue in professional preparation: Perceptions of preservice education professionals. Adoption Quarterly, 11, 24-44.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Thorn, P., & Daniels, K.(2007). Arguments for and against information sharing in families created with the help of DI – Recent developments and the results of an exploratory study. Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde, 67, 993-1001.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Van den Akker, O.B., Crawshaw, M.A., Blyth, E.D., & Frith, L.J.(2015). Expectations and experiences of gamete donors and donor-conceived adults searching for genetic relatives using DNA linking through a voluntary register. Human Reproduction, 30, 111-121.
    [Google Scholar]
40. VARTA(2014). Fertility and Assisted Reproduction: Teaching modules. For primary and secondary schools. Geraadpleegd via https://www.varta.org.au/resources/publications/fertility-and-assisted-reproduction-teaching-module
    [Google Scholar]
41. Vlaams Ministerie van Onderwijs en Vorming(2017). Vlaams onderwijs in cijfers: Schooljaar 2016-2017. Geraadpleegd via https://onderwijs.vlaanderen.be
    [Google Scholar]
42. Vlaams Ministerie van Onderwijs en Vorming (17 mei 2016). Minister Crevits trekt met bouwpakket voor onderwijs naar Parijs op de Internationale Dag tegen Homofobie en Transfobie. Geraadpleegd via https://onderwijs.vlaanderen.be
    [Google Scholar]
43. Wennberg, A.L., Rodriguez-Wallberg, K.A., Milsom, I., & Brännström, M.(2016). Attitudes towards new assisted reproductive technologies in Sweden: A survey in women 30-39 years of age. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 95, 38-44.
    [Google Scholar]