Inclusief wijkgericht werken heeft ‘ontregelende gesprekken’ in gewaagde ruimtes nodig | Amsterdam University Press Journals Online
2004
Volume 40, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 1567-7109
  • E-ISSN: 2468-1652

Abstract

Abstract

In this contribution we argue that ‘disrupting dialogues’ are necessary to connect the work of parenting and youth professionals with the lifeworld of young people who experience marginalisation and othering in the urban context. In these dialogues the experience and expressive language of youngsters form the starting point to explore different positions and blind spots. The cooperation between Ouder and KindTeams in Amsterdam and the theatre collective Lost Project shows how professionals can work creatively to engage with the lived experiences of youngsters and create empathic connections that boost mutual trust. This example shows how, through the use of theatre, professionals and youngsters can give shape to ‘daring spaces’ in which disrupting dialogues can take place. These daring spaces enable connections across multiple differences and counter the marginalisation of specific experiences and voices.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/PED2020.3.005.PONZ
2021-03-01
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/15677109/40/3/05_PED2020.3_PONZ.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5117/PED2020.3.005.PONZ&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Adichie, N. C.(2014)We should all be feminists. Vintage
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Kaulingfreks, F.(2019). Van aapjes kijken naar de mens zien. In T.Kampen, De mens centraal, geen probleem? Dilemma’s voor Professionals in Zorg en Welzijn (pp. 113-136). Alkmaar: Van Gennep.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. De Koning. A.(2015). Citizenship agendas for the abject: the production of distrust in Amsterdam's youth and security domain, Citizenship Studies, 19(2), 155168
    [Google Scholar]
  4. De Lange, M.(2019)Niet iedere sociaal professional kan of wil informeel nabij zijn. Sociale vraagstukken. https://www.socialevraagstukken.nl/niet-iedere-sociaal-professional-kan-of-wil-informeel-nabij-zijn/
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Ghorashi, H.(2012). Crisis brengt meer dan misère. De alternatieve troonrede uitgesproken op 19 september 2012 in Lux Nijmegen: hallehghorashi.com/nl/2009/03/media- activiteiten/halleh-ghorashi-alternatieve-troonrede
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Janssens, M., & Steyard, J.(2001). Meerstemmigheid. Organiseren met verschil. Leuven: Universitaire Pers Leuven
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Metzen, R., & Von Meyenfeldt, L.(2019)Amsterdam haalt casework en community work weer uit elkaar. Sociale vraagstukken. https://www.socialevraagstukken.nl/amsterdam-haalt-casework-en-communitywork-weer-uit-elkaar/
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Oosterling, H.(2000)Radicale middelmatigheid. Amsterdam: Boom Uitgevers.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Ponzoni, E., Ghorashi, H., & Badran, M. (2020). Naar een structurele plek voor het perspectief en de visie van vluchtelingen in beleidsvorming. Institute of Societal Resilience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.https://www.resilience-institute.nl/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/VU001-Rapport-Naar-een-structurele-plek-voor-het-perspectief-en-de-visie-van-vluchtelingen-in-beleidsvorming-DEF-gecomprimeerd.pdf
  10. powell, j.a.(2012). Racing to justice:Transforming our conceptions of self and other to build an inclusive society. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Welschen, S.(2019)Informele partijen zijn hulpverleningsgids voor wantrouwende Amsterdammers. Sociale vraagstukken. https://www.socialevraagstukken.nl/informele-partijen-zijn-hulpverleningsgids-voor-wantrouwende-amsterdammers/
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/PED2020.3.005.PONZ
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error