2004
Volume 53, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 1384-6930
  • E-ISSN: 1875-7286

Abstract

Samenvatting

Eerder onderzoek heeft aangetoond dat het samen kijken van media (= ‘co-viewing’) positief kan zijn voor de ouder-kindrelatie. De specifieke voorwaarden en mechanismen die deze associatie verklaren, blijven echter onderbelicht. Deze studie onderzoekt (1) het verband tussen co-viewing en de ouder-kindrelatiekwaliteit met aandacht voor de initiatiefnemer van het co-viewen (ouder of kind); (2) de mediërende rol van de zelfonthulling van kinderen over hun digitale leven aan hun ouders; en (3) de modererende rol van parallel mediagebruik – het apart gebruik van een mobiel toestel tijdens het co-viewen – door zowel ouder als kind, waarbij we verwachten dat dit het positieve verband tussen co-viewing en de kwaliteit van de ouder-kindrelatie zal verzwakken. Op basis van crosssectionele gegevens van 95 ouder-kinddyades, met kinderen tussen 9 en 15 jaar oud ( = 12.35, = 1.91), werd toegepast. De resultaten tonen aan dat zowel door ouders als door kinderen geïnitieerde co-viewing positief gerelateerd is aan de zelfonthulling van het kind. Daarnaast werd een positief verband gevonden tussen zelfonthulling en de kwaliteit van de ouder-kindrelatie, indien gerapporteerd door kinderen. De resultaten ondersteunden niet de verwachte modererende rol van parallel mediagebruik in het verband tussen co-viewing en de ouder-kindrelatie. Deze bevindingen benadrukken het potentieel van co-viewing als een waardevolle praktijk binnen de gezinscontext.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/TCW2025.3.004.JANS
2025-09-01
2025-11-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/13846930/53/3/TCW2025.3.004.JANS.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5117/TCW2025.3.004.JANS&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Alexander, A., Ryan, M. S., & Munoz, P. (1984). Creating a learning context: Investigations on the interaction of siblings during co-viewing. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 1(4), 345-364.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Beyens, I., & Beullens, K. (2017). Parent–child conflict about children’s tablet use: The role of parental mediation. New Media & Society, 19(12), 2075-2093.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Buhrmester, D. (1990). Intimacy of friendship, interpersonal competence, and adjustment during preadolescence and adolescence. Child Development, 61(4), 1101-1111.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Chambers, D. (2016). Changing media, homes and households: Cultures, technologies and meanings (1st ed.). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Clark, L. S. (2011). Parental mediation theory for the digital age. Communication Theory, 21(4), 323-343.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Common Sense Media. (2019). The new normal: Parents, teens, and devices around the world. Retrieved from https://www.commonsensemedia.org/research/the-new-normal-parents-teens-and-devices-around-the-world
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Connell, S., Lauricella, A., & Wartella, E. (2015). Parental co-use of media technology with their young children in the USA. Journal of Children and Media, 9, 1-17.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Courtois, C., & Nelissen, S. (2018). Family television viewing and its alternatives: Associations with closeness within and between generations. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 62(4), 673-691.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Coyne, S. M., Padilla-Walker, L. M., Fraser, A. M., Fellows, K., & Day, R. D. (2014). “Media time = Family time”: Positive media use in families with adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Research, 29(5), 663-688.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Crespo, C., Kielpikowski, M., Pryor, J., & Jose, P. E. (2011). Family rituals in New Zealand families: Links to family cohesion and adolescents’ well-being. Journal of Family Psychology, 25(2), 184-193.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Danet, M. (2020). Parental concerns about their school-aged children’s use of digital devices. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 29(10), 2890-2904.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Derlega, V. J., Metts, S., Petronio, S., & Margulis, S.T. (1993). Self-disclosure. Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Ewin, C. A., Reupert, A. E., McLean, L. A., & Ewin, C. J. (2021). The impact of joint media engagement on parent–child interactions: A systematic review. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 3(2), 230-254.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Groskurth, K., Bluemke, M. & Lechner, C. M. (2023). Why we need to abandon fixed cutoffs for goodness-of-fit indices: An extensive simulation and possible solutions. Behavior Research Methods, 56, 3891-3914.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Janssens, N., Meeus, A., & Beullens, K. (2024). (Dis)connecting families: Parents’ versus children’s perspectives on the role of mobile devices within family interactions. Mobile Media & Communication, 13(1), 192-213.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Jensen, M., George, M. J., Russell, M. A., Lippold, M. A., & Odgers, C. L. (2021). Daily parent-adolescent digital exchanges. Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, 49(9), 1125-1138.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1973). Uses and gratifications research. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 37, 509-523.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Kushlev, K., & Dunn, E. W. (2018). Smartphones distract parents from cultivating feelings of connection when spending time with their children. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(6), 1619-1639.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Livingstone, S., & and Helsper, E. J. (2008). Parental mediation of children’s internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52(4), 581-599.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. MediaNest. (2023). Onderzoek in Vlaanderen naar het mediagebruik van 0- tot 18-jarigen en mediaopvoeding in gezinnen. https://assets.mediawijs.be/2023-05/Rapport%20MediaNest%20Cijfers_2023_v2.pdf
  22. Meeus, A., Eggermont, S., & Beullens, K. (2020). Digital distraction or stimulated self-disclosure: Preadolescents’ mobile device use in the family context. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 25(5), 328-345.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Nathanson, A. I. (2001). Parent and child perspectives on the presence and meaning of parental television mediation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 45, 201-220.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Nie, J., Ni, X., & Lei, L. (2024). Socialized co-present phone use and parent-child relationship satisfaction: A dyadic investigation with the indirect roles of selfdisclosure and responsiveness. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 94, 101679.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Padilla-Walker, L. M., Coyne, S. M., & Fraser, A. M. (2012). Getting a high-speed family connection: Associations between family media use and family connection. Family Relations, 61(3), 426-440.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Pempek, T. A., Demers, L. B., Hanson, K. G., Kirkorian, H. L., & Anderson, D. R. (2011). The impact of infant-directed videos on parent-child interactions. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 32, 10-19.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Rossel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1-36.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Schmitt, K. L., Woolf, K. D., & Anderson, D. R. (2003). Viewing the viewers: Viewing behaviors by children and adults during television programs and commercials. Journal of Communication, 53, 265-281.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Segijn, C., Voorveld, H., Vandeberg, L., & Smit, E. (2017). The battle of the screens: Unraveling attention allocation and memory effects when multi-screening. Human Communication Research, 43(2), 295-314.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Valkenburg, P. M., Krcmar, M., Peeters, A., & Marseille, N. (1999). Developing a scale to assess three styles of television mediation: ‘‘instructive mediation,’’ ‘‘restrictive mediation,’’ and ‘‘social coviewing’’. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 43, 52-66.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Valkenburg, P. M., Sumter, S. R., & Peter, J. (2011). Gender differences in online and offline self-disclosure in pre-adolescence and adolescence. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 29, 253-269.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Vanattenhoven, J., & Geerts, D. (2017). Social experiences within the home using second screen TV applications. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 76, 5661-5689.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Van den Eijnden, R., Koning, I., Doornwaard, S., van Gurp, F., & Ter Bogt, T. (2018). The impact of heavy and disordered use of games and social media on adolescents’ psychological, social, and school functioning. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 7(3), 697-706.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Wang, M., Lwin, M. O., Cayabyab, Y. M. T. M., Hou, G., & You, Z. (2023). A meta-analysis of factors predicting parental mediation of children’s media use based on studies published between 1992–2019. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 32, 1249-1260.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.5117/TCW2025.3.004.JANS
Loading
/content/journals/10.5117/TCW2025.3.004.JANS
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error