OA

In het oog van de permanente storm: de rol van strategisch HRM en leiderschap in een veranderende publieke context

References

1. Appelbaum, E., Bailey, T., Berg, P., & Kalleberg, A. (2001). Do high performance work systems pay off?Research in the Sociology of Work, 10, 85-107.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Aust, I., Brandl, J., & Keegan, A. (2015). State-of-the-art and future directions for HRM from a paradox perspective: Introduction to the Special Issue. German Journal of Human Resource Management, 29(3-4), 194-213.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Backhaus, L., Reuber, A., Vogel, D., & Vogel, R. (2022). Giving sense about paradoxes: paradoxical leadership in the public sector. Public Management Review, 24(9), 1478-1498.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Berkel, R. van, Penning de Vries, J., & Knies, E. (2022). Managing street-level bureaucrats’ performance by promoting professional behavior through HRM. Public Personnel Management, 51(2), 189-212.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bertram, I., Bouwman, R., & Tummers, L. (2024). Getting what you expect: How civil servant stereotypes affect citizen satisfaction and perceived performance. Public Administration, 102(4), 1468-1491.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Borst, R. T., & Knies, E. (2021). Well-Being of Public Servants Under Pressure: The Roles of Job Demands and Personality Traits in the Health-Impairment Process. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 43(1), 159-184.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Boselie, P., Dietz, G., & Boon, C. (2005). ‘Commonalities and contradictions in HRM and performance research.’Human Resource Management Journal, 15(3), 67-94.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Boxall, P., & Purcell, J. (2022). Strategy and Human Resource Management. (5th edition). Bloomsbury Publishing.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Brandl, J., Keegan, A., & Aust, I. (2022). Line managers and HRM: A relational approach to paradox. In Research Handbook on Line Managers (pp. 82-94). dward Elgar Publishing.
   [Google Scholar]
10. De Clercq, D., Fatima, T., & Jahanzeb, S. (2025). Pandemic crisis and employee skills: how emotion regulation and improvisation limit the damaging effects of perceived pandemic threats on job performance. Journal of Management & Organization, 31(4), 2059-2078.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative science quarterly, 44(2), 350-383.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Favero, N., Walker, R. M., & Zhang, J. (2024). A dynamic study of citizen satisfaction: replicating and extending Van Ryzin’s “testing the expectancy disconfirmation model of citizen satisfaction with local government.”Public Management Review, 27(6), 1588–1606.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Fu, N., Flood, P. C., Rousseau, D. M., & Morris, T. (2020). Line managers as paradox navigators in HRM implementation: Balancing consistency and individual responsiveness. Journal of Management, 46(2), 203-233.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Head, B. W. (2022). Policy Innovation in Turbulent Times. In Wicked Problems in Public Policy: Understanding and Responding to Complex Challenges (pp. 123-139). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Huselid, M. A. (1995). The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of management journal, 38(3), 635-672.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Lawrence, M., Homer-Dixon, T., Janzwood, S., Rockstöm, J., Renn, O., & Donges, J. F. (2024). Global polycrisis: the causal mechanisms of crisis entanglement. Global Sustainability, 7, e6.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Lee, E. (2025). The Moderating role of Organizational Culture in the Relationship Between Job Autonomy and Innovative Behavior. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 0734371X251342001.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Leroy, H., Segers, J., van Dierendonck, D., & den Hartog, D. (2018). Managing people in organizations: Integrating the study of HRM and leadership. Human Resource Management Review, 28(3), 249-257.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Lintanga, A. J. B. J., & Rathakrishnan, B. (2024). The impact of psychosocial safety climate on public sector job satisfaction: the moderating role of organizational climate. BMC psychology, 12(1), 38.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Medcof, J. W., & Song, L. J. (2013). Exploration, exploitation and human resource management practices in cooperative and entrepreneurial HR configurations. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(15), 2911-2926.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Meer, J.J.S. van der. & Vermeeren, B. (2025). Van Bureaucraat tot Netwerker: Hoe Ambtenaren hun Rol en Prestaties opvatten. Tijdschrift voor Bestuurskunde.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Paauwe, J. (2020). HRM en performance: Wat is er bereikt?. Tijdschrift voor HRM, 23(2), 24-43.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Paauwe, J., Guest, D., & Wright, P. (2013). HRM and Performance: Achievements and Challenges. Wiley Press.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Paauwe, J., Boselie, J.P., & Richardson, R. (2002). Human resource management, institutionalism and organisational performance: A comparison of hospitals, hotels and local governments. Rotterdam School of Economics: Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Penning de Vries, J., & Vermeeren, B. (2025). How a manager’s background shapes perceived leader credibility: A survey experiment among teachers and civil servants in The Netherlands. International Public Management Journal, 28(2), 314-332.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Piening, E. P., Baluch, A. M., & Ridder, H. G. (2014). Mind the intended-implemented gap: Understanding employees’ perceptions of HRM. Human Resource Management, 53(4), 545-567.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Pina e Cunha, M. P., Gomes, E., Mellahi, K., Miner, A. S., & Rego, A. (2020). Strategic agility through improvisational capabilities: Implications for a paradox-sensitive HRM. Human Resource Management Review, 30(1), 100695.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Purcell, J., & Hutchinson, S. (2007). Front-line managers as agents in the HRM-performance causal chain: theory, analysis and evidence. Human Resource management journal, 17(1), 3-20.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Miron-Spektor, E., Ingram, A., Keller, J., Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2018). Microfoundations of organizational paradox: The problem is how we think about the problem. Academy of Management Journal, 61(1), 26–45.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Rainey, H., Fernandez, S., & Malatesta, D. (2021). Understanding and Managing Public Organizations (6th edition). Jossey-Bass, Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Ren, L., Zhang, X., Chen, P., & Liu, Q. (2022). The impact of empowering leadership on employee improvisation: Roles of challenge-hindrance stress and psychological availability. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 2783-2801.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Saridakis, G., Lai, Y., & Cooper, C. L. (2017). Exploring the relationship between HRM and firm performance: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Human Resource Management Review, 27(1), 87-96.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Schädeli, D., & Ritz, A. (2024). Managing paradoxes in the public sector: a systematic and problematizing review of macro-level concepts. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 37(6), 789-804.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Schädeli, D. (2025). The emotional aftermath of choices: Examining how value-congruent behavior and paradox mindset support confident decision making. International Public Management Journal, 28(1), 87-106.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 381–403.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Tan, L., Hao, P., Gao, H., & Wojtczuk-Turek, A. (2024). How does paradoxical leadership affect employee adaptive performance? A moderated mediation model. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 37(7), 1535-1558.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Taskan, B., Junça-Silva, A., & Caetano, A. (2022). Clarifying the conceptual map of VUCA: a systematic review. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 30(7), 196-217.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Vermeeren, B. (2017). Influencing public sector performance: studying the impact of ability-, motivation-and opportunity-enhancing human resources practices on various performance outcomes in the public sector. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 83(4), 717-737.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Wright, P., & Nishii, L. (2013). Strategic HRM and organizational behaviour: Integrating multiple levels of analysis. In J.Paauwe, D.Guest, & P.Wright (Eds.), HRM & Performance: Achievements & Challenges (pp. 97–110). Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Yeung, K. (2023). The new public analytics as an emerging paradigm in public sector administration. Tilburg Law Review, 27(2), 1-32.
    [Google Scholar]