2004
Volume 40, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0169-2216
  • E-ISSN: 2468-9424

Abstract

Samenvatting

Het technologie debat focust sterk op de potentiële gevolgen voor werknemers en organisaties. Veel minder is bekend over het ontwikkel- en implementatieproces van technologie. Het is net in dat proces dat de keuzes gemaakt worden die de uiteindelijke gevolgen van technologische innovatie bepalen. Voor mijn proefschrift onderzocht ik de rol van werknemersparticipatie in technologische innovatieprocessen. Ik stelde vast dat de invloed van werknemers en vakbonden bij technologische innovatie eerder beperkt is en dat ons huidig denken over technologie als zijnde apolitiek en deterministisch deze positie van werknemers verder dreigt te eroderen. Deze assumpties stroken bovendien niet met de werkelijkheid. Op de werkvloer is technologische innovatie nog steeds een politiek, situatie-specifiek proces met gedeeltelijk contingente uitkomsten. Door het politieke karakter van technologische innovatie te minimaliseren, zal technologie op de werkvloer vooral de status quo versterken.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/TVA2024.1.009.VERE
2024-03-01
2024-11-03
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. https://kuleuven.limo.libis.be/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=lirias4069381&context=SearchWebhook&vid=32KUL_KUL:Lirias&lang=en&search_scope=lirias_prRIASe&adaptor=SearchWebhook&tab=LIRIAS&query=any,contains,LIRIAS4069381&offset=0
  2. Vereycken, Y., Ramioul, M., & Hermans, M. (2021). Old wine in new bottles? Revisiting employee participation in Industry 4.0. New Technology, Work and Employment, 36(1), 44-73.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Vereycken, Y., Ramioul, M., Desiere, S., & Bal, M. (2021). Human resource practices accompanying industry 4.0 in European manufacturing industry. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 32(5), 1016-1036.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Vereycken, Y., Van Herreweghe, D., & Ramioul, M. (2022). Sociale dialoog bij technologische innovatie in België: Een Delphi-studie bij de sociale partners. Tijdschrift Voor Arbeidsvraagstukken, 38(3), 385-416.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Vereycken, Y., Guisset, A., & Ramioul, M. (2023). The same but different. Understanding variation and similarity in the outcomes of a similar technology. Under review.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Aiginger, K., & Rodrik, D. (2020). Rebirth of Industrial Policy and an Agenda for the Twenty-First Century. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 20(2), 189-207.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Arntz, M., Gregory, T., & Zierahn, U. (2016). The Risk of Automation for Jobs in OECD Countries: A Comparative Analysis (189). https://doi.org/10.1787/5jlz9h56dvq7-en
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2015). The second machine age. Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. W. W. Norton & Company.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Butollo, F., Jürgens, U., & Krzywdzinski, M. (2018). From lean production to Industry 4.0. More autonomy for employees? In WZB Discussion Paper (SP III 2018-303). WZB Berlin Social Science Center. Geraadpleegd op 14februari2024, van https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/wzbgwp/spiii2018303.html
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Caruso, L. (2018). Digital innovation and the fourth industrial revolution: epochal social changes?AI & SOCIETY, 33(3), 379-392.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Cattero, B., & D’Onofrio, M. (2018). Organizing and Collective Bargaining in the Digitized “Tertiary Factories” of Amazon: A Comparison Between Germany and Italy. In E.Ales, Y.Curzi, T.Fabbri, O.Rymkevich, & S.Giovanni (Reds.), Working in Digital and Smart Organizations (pp. 141-164). Palgrave Macmillan Cham.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Cirillo, V., Rinaldini, M., Staccioli, J., & Virgillito, M. E. (2021). Technology vs. workers: the case of Italy’s Industry 4.0 factories. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 56, 166-183.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Clark, J., McLoughlin, I., Rose, H., & King, R. (1988). The process of technological change: New technology and social choice in the workplace. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Corbett, J. M. (1996). Development of user-centered advanced manufacturing technology: New design practice or new marketing rhetoric?The International Journal of Human Factors in Manufacturing, 6(2), 79-87.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. De Spiegelaere, S. (2020). Het sociaal overleg op ondernemingsniveau: innovatie met de experimenten Hansenne. In Minerva Paper (Vol. 12). Geraadpleegd op 14februari2024 van http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-8677809
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Eurofound (2019). The future of manufacturing in Europe 2015-2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Ford, M. (2015). The rise of the robots: technology and the threat of mass unemployment. Oneworld Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2017). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation?Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114, 254-280.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Goos, M. (2018). The impact of technological progress on labour markets: Policy challenges. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 34(3), 362-375.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Goos, M., Manning, A., & Salomons, A. (2014). Explaining job polarization: Routine-biased technological change and offshoring. American Economic Review, 104(8), 2509-2526.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Heery, E. (2016). Framing work: unitary, pluralist and critical perspectives in the 21st century. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Howcroft, D., & Taylor, P. (2014). ‘Plus ca change, plus la meme chose?’-researching and theorising the ‘new’ new technologies. New Technology, Work and Employment, 29(1), 1-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Howcroft, D., & Taylor, P. (2022). Automation and the future of work: A social shaping of technology approach. New Technology, Work and Employment. https://doi.org/10.1111/NTWE.12240
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Hyman, J. D. (2018). Employee voice and participation: contested past, troubled present, uncertain future. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Kagermann, H., Wahlster, W., & Helbig, J. (2013). Recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative INDUSTRIE 4.0. Industrie 4.0 working group. Geraadpleegd op 15januari2024, van https://www.din.de/resource/blob/76902/e8cac883f42bf28536e7e8165993f1fd/recommendations-for-implementing-industry-4-0-data.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Kern, H. S. M. (1984). Das Ende der Arbeitsteilung. Rationalisierung in der industriellen Produktion. Beck.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Kopp, R., Dhondt, S., Hirsch-Kresinsen, H., Kohlgrüber, M., & Preenen, P. (2019). Sociotechnical perspective on digitalisation and Industry 4.0. Technology Transfer and Commercialisation, 16(6), 290-309.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Martin Corbett, J. (1990). Human centered advanced manufacturing systems: From rhetoric to reality. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 5(1), 83-90.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Mazali, T. (2018). From industry 4.0 to society 4.0, there and back. AI & SOCIETY, 33(3), 405-411.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Mazzucato, M., & Collington, R. (2023). The Big Con. How the Consulting Industry Weakens our Businesses, Infantilizes our Governments and Warps our Economies. Allen Lane.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Merhar, L., Berger, C., Braunreuther, S., & Reinhart, G. (2019). Digitization of Manufacturing Companies: Employee Acceptance Towards Mobile and Wearable Devices. In T.Ahram (Red.), Advances in Human Factors in Wearable Technologies and Game Design. AHFE 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (Vol. 795, pp. 187-197). Springer, Cham.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Meylemans, L., Vanderstukken, A., & Ramioul, M. (2018). Industrie 4.0: Resultaten enquête “Aanwezigheid en impact van nieuwe technologieën in sectoren van ACV-CSC METEA”.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Noble, D. F. (1987). Social choice in machine design: The case of automatically controlled machine tools. Politics & Society, 8(3-4), 313-347.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Pfeiffer, S. (2017). The Vision of “Industry 4.0” in the Making – a Case of Future Told, Tamed, and Traded. NanoEthics, 11(1), 107-121.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Rauch, E., Linder, C., & Dallasega, P. (2020). Anthropocentric perspective of production before and within Industry 4.0. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 139(x), 105644.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Romero, D., Mattsson, S., Fast-berglund, Å., Wuest, T., Gorecky, D., & Stahre, J. (2018). Advances in Production Management Systems. Smart Manufacturing for Industry 4.0. In I.Moon, G. M.Lee, J.Park, D.Kiritsis, & G.von Cieminski (Reds.), Advances in Production Management Systems. Smart Manufacturing for Industry 4.0 (Vol. 536). Springer International Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Salento, A. (2018). Digitalisation and the regulation of work: theoretical issues and normative challenges. AI and Society, 33(3), 369-378.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Schwab, K. (2016). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Penguin.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Thompson, P., & Laaser, K. (2021). Beyond technological determinism: revitalising labour process analyses of technology, capital, and labour. Work in the Global Economy, 1(1-2), 139-159.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Vereycken, Y., Ramioul, M., & Hermans, M. (2021). Old wine in new bottles? Revisiting employee participation in Industry 4.0. New Technology, Work and Employment, 36(1), 44-73.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Vereycken, Y., Van Herreweghe, D., & Ramioul, M. (2022). Sociale dialoog bij technologische innovatie in België: Een Delphi-studie bij de sociale partners. Tijdschrift Voor Arbeidsvraagstukken, 38(3), 385-416.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Warhurst, C., & Hunt, W. (2019). The digitalisation of future work and employment: Possible impact and policy responses (No. 2019/05; RC Working Papers Series on Labour, Education and Technology). European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC).
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Wilkinson, B. (1983). The Shopfloor Politics of New Technology. Heineman.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.5117/TVA2024.1.009.VERE
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error