Vijf grote uitdagingen in de wetenschapscommunicatie

References

1. Adams, R. C., Challenger, A., Bratton, L., Boivin, J., Bott, L., Powell, G., Williams, A., Chambers, C. D., & Sumner, P.(2019). Claims of causality in health news: A randomised trial. BMC Medicine, 17(1), 91.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Buhse, S., Rahn, A. C., Bock, M., & Mühlhauser, I.(2018). Causal interpretation of correlational studies – Analysis of medical news on the website of the official journal for German physicians. PLOS ONE, 13(5), e0196833.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Cagan, R.(2013). The San Francisco declaration on research assessment. Disease Models & Mechanisms, 6(4), 869-870.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Costa, E. & Villa, R.(2020). Science communication education in Europe. CARTO. https://questproject.eu/where-are-science-communication-courses-in-europe
5. Engelshoven, I. van. (2019). Nieuwsgierig en betrokken. De waarde van wetenschap. Ministerie van Algemene Zaken.
6. Entradas, M., Bauer, M. W., O’Muircheartaigh, C., Marcinkowski, F., Okamura, A., Pellegrini, G., Besley, J., Massarani, L., Russo, P., Dudo, A., Saracino, B., Silva, C., Kano, K., Amorim, L., Bucchi, M., Suerdem, A., Oyama, T., & Li, Y.-Y.(2020). Public communication by research institutes compared across countries and sciences: Building capacity for engagement or competing for visibility?PLOS ONE, 15(7), e0235191.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Gerber, A., Metcalfe, J., Broks, P., Lorke, J., Gabriel, M., & Lorenz, L.(2020). Science communication research: An empirical field analysis [Government report]. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research.
8. Guenther, L., & Joubert, M.(2017). Science communication as a field of research: Identifying trends, challenges and gaps by analysing research papers. Journal of Science Communication, 16(02), A02.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Heyl, A., Joubert, M., & Guenther, L.(2020). Churnalism and hype in science communication: Comparing university press releases and journalistic articles in South Africa. Communicatio, 46(2), 126-145.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Hooykaas, M. J. D., Schilthuizen, M., Aten, C., Hemelaar, E. M., Albers, C. J., & Smeets, I.(2019). Identification skills in biodiversity professionals and laypeople: A gap in species literacy. Biological Conservation, 238, 108202.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Jensen, E.(2014). The problems with science communication evaluation. Journal of Science Communication, 13(1), C04.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Jensen, P., Rouquier, J.-B., Kreimer, P., & Croissant, Y.(2008). Scientists who engage with society perform better academically. Science and Public Policy, 35(7), 527-541.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Kleinhans, M., Verbeek, P.-P., & Putten, M. van der. (2012). Tussen onderzoek en samenleving: Aanbevelingen voor optimale wetenschapscommunicatie. https://knaw.nl/nl/actueel/publicaties/tussen-onderzoek-en-samenleving
14. Landelijk Orgaan Wetenschappelijke Integriteit. (2019). LOWI Advies 2019, nr. 22. Landelijk Orgaan Wetenschappelijke Integriteit. https://lowi.nl/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/LOWI-advies_2019-22.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
15. Lendering, J.(2012). De klad in de klassieken,. Athenaeum.
16. Martinez-Conde, S.(2016). Has contemporary academia outgrown the Carl Sagan effect?Journal of Neuroscience, 36(7), 2077-2082.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Mooney, C. C.(2010). Do scientists understand the public?American Academy of Arts and Sciences Cambridge, MA.
18. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2017). Communicating science effectively: A research agenda. National Academies Press.
19. NeFCA. (2019). Science communication as boundary space for negotiation. NeFCA.
20. Nelles, J., & Vorley, T.(2010). From policy to practice: Engaging and embedding the third mission in contemporary universities. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 30(7/8), 341-353.
    [Google Scholar]
21. NWO. (2020). Ruim 1 miljoen euro voor nieuwe impuls wetenschapscommunicatie. NWO.
22. Schat, J., Bossema, F. G., Numans, M. E., Smeets, I., & Burger, P.(2018). Overdreven gezondheidsnieuws. Relatie tussen overdrijving in academische persberichten en in nieuwsmedia. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde, 162(5).
    [Google Scholar]
23. Scheufele, D. A., Krause, N. M., Freiling, I., & Brossard, D.(2020). How not to lose the COVID-19 communication war. Issues in Science and Technology. https://issues.org/covid-19-communication-war
    [Google Scholar]
24. Simis, M. J., Madden, H., Cacciatore, M. A., & Yeo, S. K.(2016). The lure of rationality: Why does the deficit model persist in science communication?Public Understanding of Science, 25(4), 400-414.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Smeets, I.(2016). Enige beschouwingen over de waarde der wetenschapscommunicatie [Oratie, Universiteit Leiden, Leiden]. www.ionica.nl/oratie-universiteit-leiden
26. Sumner, P., Vivian-Griffiths, S., Boivin, J., Williams, A., Venetis, C. A., Davies, A., Ogden, J., Whelan, L., Hughes, B., Dalton, B., Boy, F., & Chambers, C. D.(2014). The association between exaggeration in health related science news and academic press releases: Retrospective observational study. BMJ, 349, g7015.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Van Dam, F., de Bakker, L., Dijkstra, A. M., & Jensen, E. A. (Red.) (2020). Science communication: An introduction. World Scientific. https://doi.org/10.1142/11541
28. Van Gerven, D., Land-Zandstra, A., & Damsma, W.(2018). Authenticity matters: Children look beyond appearances in their appreciation of museum objects. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 8(4), 325-339.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Verkade, A.(2017). Beoordelingsinstrument wetenschapscommunicatie. Rathenau Instituut.
30. Vogler, D., & Schäfer, M. S.(2020). Growing influence of university pr on science news coverage? A longitudinal automated content analysis of university media releases and newspaper coverage in Switzerland, 2003-2017. International Journal of Communication, 14, 22.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Wynne, B.(1996). Misunderstood misunderstandings: Social identities and public uptake of science. In A.Irwin & B.Wynne (Red.), Misunderstanding science? The public reconstruction of science and technology (pp. 19-46). Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Zarkadakis, G.(2010). FameLab: A talent competition for young scientists. Science Communication, 32(2), 281-287.
    [Google Scholar]