2004
Volume 78, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0039-8691
  • E-ISSN: 2215-1214
file format pdf download PDF

Samenvatting

Abstract

This contribution concerns series of interrelated vowel shifts (‘chain shifts’) in the dialects spoken in and around the southeastern Flemish town of Ronse, which lies almost on the Dutch-French language border. The aim is to better substantiate the facts systematically described by the late Johan Taeldeman and his interpretation of them as a Great Vowel Shift. To this end, Taeldeman’s data (presented here in diplomatic edition) are first compared with those from reliable other sources. Two stages of change can be distinguished in the data (the first with merger, the second without), the second being specific to the Ronse dialect. The patterns that emerge are interpreted in the light of older and younger approaches to sound shifts. Subsequently the question is addressed of why the Ronse dialect added a second, internally motivated series of vowel shifts to the series of shifts that had already taken place earlier in the other (South-) East Flemish dialects. The second series exhibits one striking shift that runs counter to empirically and theoretically solidly grounded universal patterns that sound shifts tend to exhibit. This ‘unnatural’ shift seems to be related to the influence of the dialect of Brussels, with which Ronse, like Ghent, formed a historical city network. Further research could focus on whether and how the long-term and intensive contact with Picard played a role and the nature, cause and development of the heterogeneity of the Ronse dialect identified by previous researchers.

© Frans Hinskens
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/TET2026.1.003.HINS
2026-04-01
2026-04-14

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/00398691/78/1/TET2026.1.003.HINS.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5117/TET2026.1.003.HINS&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Bouchez, Maurice (1998), ‘t Ronssies in guiren en kluiren. Proeve van woordenboek van het Ronses dialect. Saint-Sauveur: uitgave in eigen beheer.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Bree, Cor van (2017), Leerboek voor de historische grammatica van het Nederlands. Deel 1. Gotische grammatica, Inleiding, Klankleer. 2e uitgave Universiteit Leiden. https://scholarlypublications.universiteitleiden.nl/handle/1887/38870
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Chomsky, Noam & MorisHalle (1968), The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. FAND deel II = JanGoossens, JohanTaeldeman en GeertVerleyen (2000), Fonologische Atlas van de Nederlandse Dialecten. Deel II De Westgermaanse korte vocalen in open lettergreep. Gent: Koninklijke Academie voor Nederlandse Taal- en Letterkunde.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Goeman, Ton (1994), Geen Great Vowel Shift in de Nederlandse dialecten, in: GeertBooij & Jaapvan Marle (eds), Dialectfonologie. Amsterdam: P.J. Meertens Instituut, 20-59.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Goldrick, Matthew (2000), Turbid Output Representations and the Unity of Opacity, North East Linguistics Society30, 231–246. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/nels/vol30/iss1/17
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Goossens, Jan (1992), Dialecten in het centrale Zuidnederlandse stedennetwerk. Taal en Tongval. Themanummer 5: 29-47.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Gordon, Matthew (2015), Exploring chain shifts, mergers, and near-mergers as changes in progress. In: PatrickHoneybone and JosephSalmons (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Historical Phonology. Oxford: OUP, 173–190.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Grassmann, Hermann (1863), Über die Aspiraten und ihr gleichzeitiges Vorhandensein im An- und Auslaute der Wurzeln. Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung auf dem Gebiete des Deutschen, Griechischen und Lateinischen12 (2), 81–138.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. GTRp = Goeman-Taeldeman-van Reenenproject. https://mand.meertens.knaw.nl/database
  11. Hinskens, Frans (2021), The Expanding Universe of the Study of Sound Change. In: RichardJanda, BrianJoseph & BarbaraVance (eds). The Handbook of Historical Linguistics. Volume II. Wiley-Blackwell, 7-46.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Hoebeke, Marcel (1981), Enkele fonologische tegenstellingen tussen Oudenaards en Ronses. Taal en Tongval33, 87-96.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Jacobi, Irene (2009), On variation and change in diphthongs and long vowels of spoken Dutch. Proefschrift, Universiteit van Amsterdam.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Jacobs, Haike (1995), Optimality Theory and sound change. In: J.Beckman (ed.), Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society. Vol. Two: Papers from the Workshops on Language Acquisition & Language Change. Amherst: GLSA, 219-232.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Kiparsky, Paul (2016), Labov, Sound Change and Phonological Theory. In: AllanBell, DavidBritain and DevyaniSharma (eds), Labov and sociolinguistics: Fifty years of language in social context. Special issue of Journal of Sociolinguistics20, 4, 464-488.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Labov, William (1994), Principles of linguistic change. Volume 1: Internal factors. Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Labov, William (2010), Principles of linguistic change. Volume 3: Cognitive and cultural factors. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Loey, Adolphe van (1949), Middelnederlandse spraakkunst. Deel II Klankleer. Groningen: Tjeenk Willink. https://www.dbnl.org/tekst/loey001midd03_01/index.php
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Łubowicz, Anna (2003), Contrast Preservation in Phonological Mappings. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Amherst, Mass.: GSLA. ROA-554.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Łubowicz, Anna (2016), Contrast preservation in Polish Palatalization. Glossa. A journal of general linguistics1, 1:21, 1–27.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Martinet, André (1955), Économie des changements phonétiques: Traité de phonologie diachronique. Bern: Éditions Francke.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. McCarthy, John (1999), Sympathy and phonological opacity. Phonology16, 3, 331-399. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.umass.edu/linguist_faculty_pubs/78
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Moosmüller, Sylvia & HannesScheutz (2013), Chain shifts revisited: the case of monophthongisation and E-merger in the city dialects of Salzburg and Vienna. In: PeterAuer, Javier CaroReina and GözKaufmann (eds), Language variation – European perspectives IV (pp. 173–186). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Moulton, William (1961), Lautwandel durch innere Kausalität: die Ostschweizerische Vokalspaltung. Zeitschrift für Mundartforschung, 28, 227–251.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Noske, Roland (2012), The Grimm-Verner push chain and Contrast Preservation Theory. In: BertBotma & RolandNoske (eds.), Phonological explorations. Empirical, theoretical and diachronic issues. Berlin / Boston: De Gruyter, 63-86.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Paul, Hermann (1880/1920), Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte. Max Niemeyer, Halle. (5e ed.).
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Pée, Willem (1968), Een Ronsese kwestie en een averechtse verklaring. Taal en TongvalXX, 74-76.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Pfalz, Anton (1919), Reihenschritte im Vokalismus. Beiträge zur Kunde der bairischösterreichischen Mundarten, 22–42.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. RND = Reeks Nederlandse Dialectatlassen. Uit Deel 2 Zuid-Oost-Vlaanderen: Ronsehttps://www.dialectzinnen.ugent.be/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/O265_Ronse.pdf
  30. Salmons, Joseph & PatrickHoneybone (2015), Structuralist historical phonology: systems in segmental change. In: PatrickHoneybone and JosephSalmons (eds), The Oxford handbook of the historical phonology (pp. 31–46). Oxford: OUP.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Siertsema, Berthe (1980), Wat is het strukturalisme? In: BernardTervoort (ed), Wetenschap & taal III; een derde reeks benaderingen van het verschijnsel taal (pp. 195–211). Muiderberg: Coutinho.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Sievers, Eduard (1876), Grundzüge der Lautphysiologie zur Einführung in das Studium der Lautlehre der indogermaischen Sprachen. Leipzig: Breitkopf and Härtel.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Taeldeman, Johan (2000), Primaire of secundaire diftongering? In: Veroniquede Tier, MagdalenaDevos en Jacquesvan Keymeulen (eds), Nochtans Was Scherp van Zin: Een Bundel Artikelen Aangeboden Aan Hugo Ryckeboer Voor Zijn 65ste Verjaardag, Universiteit Gent, Vakgroep Nederlandse Taalkunde, 383–90.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Taeldeman, Johan (2013), East Flemish: Phonology. In: FransHinskens & JohanTaeldeman (eds), Language and Space: Dutch. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 211-234.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Teirlinck, Isidoor (1924), Klank- en vormleer van het Zuid-oostvlaandersch dialect. Deel 4 van het Zuid-oostvlaandersch Idioticon. Gent: Siffer.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Verner, Karl (1876), Eine ausnahme der ersten lautverschiebung. Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung auf dem Gebiete der indogermanischen Sprachen23 (2), 97–130.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.5117/TET2026.1.003.HINS
Loading
Een Zuidoost-Vlaamse Great Vowel Shift in Ronse?
Taal en Tongval 78, 45 (2026); https://doi.org/10.5117/TET2026.1.003.HINS
/content/journals/10.5117/TET2026.1.003.HINS
/content/journals/10.5117/TET2026.1.003.HINS
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Soort artikel: Research Article
Keyword(s): (Zuid-) Oostvlaams; chain shift; dialect- en taalcontact; historische fonologie; intern gemotiveerde verandering; klinkerinventaris; Ronsisch

Meest geciteerd Most Cited RSS feed

Dit is een verplicht veld
Graag een geldig e-mailadres invoeren
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error