Technologiegebruik in de praktijk

References

1. Bailey, D. E., & Barley, S. R. (2020). Beyond design and use: How scholars should study intelligent technologies. Information and Organization, 30(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2019.100286
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bal, M., Benders, J., & Vermeerbergen, L. (2022). ‘Bringing the Covert into the Open’: A Case Study on Technology Appropriation and Continuous Improvement. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19106333
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bal, M., Vermeerbergen, L., & Benders, J. (2023). Putting head-worn displays to use for order picking: a most-similar comparative case study. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 34(5), 1475–1499. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-12-2021-0570
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bal, M., Benders, J., Dhondt, S., & Vermeerbergen, L. (2021). Head-worn displays and job content: A systematic literature review. Applied Ergonomics, 91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103285
   [Google Scholar]
5. Barley, S. R. (1986). Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(1), 78-108. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392767
   [Google Scholar]
6. Baumer, E. P. S., & Brubaker, J. R. (2017). Post-userism. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 6291-6303. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025740
   [Google Scholar]
7. Benders, J. (1995). Output characteristics as input in the skilling debate. Work, Employment and Society, 9(2), 329-342. https://doi.org/10.1177/095001709592006
   [Google Scholar]
8. Benders, J., Dhondt, S., & Van Hootegem, G. (2015). Gereedschap is belangrijk, maar wat doe je ermee? Technologie, functie-ontwerp en het niveau van toekomstige banen. Tijdschrift voor Arbeidsvraagstukken, 31(2), 142-146. https://doi.org/10.5117/2015.031.002.142
   [Google Scholar]
9. Benders, J., Hoeken, P., Batenburg, R., & Schouteten, R. (2006). First organise, then automate: a modern socio-technical view on ERP systems and teamworking. New Technology, Work and Employment, 21(3), 242-251. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-005X.2006.00178.x
   [Google Scholar]
10. Bødker, S. (2006). When second wave HCI meets third wave challenges. Proceedings of the 4th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Changing Roles, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1145/1182475.1182476
    [Google Scholar]
11. Bødker, S., Dindler, C., & Iversen, O. S. (2017). Tying knots: Participatory infrastructuring at work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 26, 245-273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-017-9268-y
    [Google Scholar]
12. Braverman, H. (1998). Labor and monopoly capital: The degradation of work in the twentieth century. New York University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Christis, J. H. P. (2011). De moderne sociotechniek als theoretische onderbouwing van Lean. M&O, Tijdschrift voor Management en Organisatie, 65(2), 96-114.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Ciborra, C. U., & Lanzara, G. F. (1994). Formative contexts and information technology: Understanding the dynamics of innovation in organizations. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies, 4(2), 61-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-8022(94)90005-1
    [Google Scholar]
15. Collins, P. D., & Hull, F. (1986). Technology and span of control: Woodward revisited. Journal of Management Studies, 23(2), 143-164. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1986.tb00417.x
    [Google Scholar]
16. Culot, G., Nassimbeni, G., Orzes, G., & Sartor, M. (2020). Behind the definition of Industry 4.0: Analysis and open questions. International Journal of Production Economics, 226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107617
    [Google Scholar]
17. De Vaujany, F.-X., & Mitev, N. (2017). The post-Macy paradox, information management and organising: Good intentions and a road to hell?Culture and Organization, 23(5), 379-407. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759551.2015.1103242
    [Google Scholar]
18. DeSanctis, G., & Poole, M. S. (1994). Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organization Science, 5(2), 121-147. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.2.121
    [Google Scholar]
19. Faulkner, P., & Runde, J. (2019). Theorizing the Digital Object. MIS Quarterly, 43(4), 1279-1302. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2019/13136
    [Google Scholar]
20. Feldman, M. S., & Orlikowski, W. J. (2011). Theorizing practice and practicing theory. Organization Science, 22(5), 1240-1253. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0612
    [Google Scholar]
21. Fitts, P. M. (Red.). (1951). Human engineering for an effective air-navigation and traffic-control system. National Research Council, Division of Anthropology and Psychology, Committee on Aviation Psychology.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory: Action, structure, and contradiction in social analysis (Vol. 241). University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Giddens, A., & Pierson, C. (1998). Conversations with Anthony Giddens: Making sense of modernity. Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Gould, J. D., & Lewis, C. (1985). Designing for usability: key principles and what designers think. Communications of the ACM, 28(3), 300-311. https://doi.org/10.1145/3166.3170
    [Google Scholar]
25. Grint, K., & Woolgar, S. (2013). The machine at work: Technology, work and organization. John Wiley & Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Herzberg, F. (1968). One more time: How do you motivate employees. Harvard Business Review, 46(1), 53-62.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Hinings, B., Gegenhuber, T., & Greenwood, R. (2018). Digital innovation and transformation: An institutional perspective. Information and Organization, 28(1), 52-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2018.02.004
    [Google Scholar]
28. Kallinikos, J. (2012). Form, function, and matter: Crossing the border of materiality. In: P. M.Leonardi, B. A., Nardi, & J.Kallinikos (Reds.), Materiality and organizing: Social interaction in a technological world (pp. 67–87). Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Karasek Jr, R. A. (1979). Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: Implications for job redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(2) 285–308. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392498
    [Google Scholar]
30. Khakurel, J., Melkas, H., & Porras, J. (2018). Tapping into the wearable device revolution in the work environment: a systematic review. Information Technology & People, 31(3), 791–818. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-03-2017-0076
    [Google Scholar]
31. Laaser, K., & Karlsson, J. C. (2022). Towards a sociology of meaningful work. Work, Employment and Society, 36(5), 798-815. https://doi.org/10.1177/09500170211055998
    [Google Scholar]
32. Lasi, H., Fettke, P., Kemper, H.-G., Feld, T., & Hoffmann, M. (2014). Industry 4.0. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 6, 239–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-014-0334-4
    [Google Scholar]
33. Leonardi, P. M. (2011). When flexible routines meet flexible technologies: Affordance, constraint, and the imbrication of human and material agencies. MIS Quarterly, 35(1), 147–167. https://doi.org/10.2307/23043493
    [Google Scholar]
34. Leonardi, P. M. (2012). Materiality, sociomateriality, and socio-technical systems: What do these terms mean? How are they different? Do we need them? In P. M.Leonardi, B. A.Nardi, & J.Kallinikos (Reds.), Materiality and organizing: Social interaction in a technological world (pp. 24-48). Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Leonardi, P. M. (2013). Theoretical foundations for the study of sociomateriality. Information and Organization, 23(2), 59-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoand-org.2013.02.002
    [Google Scholar]
36. Leonardi, P. M., & Barley, S. R. (2008). Materiality and change: Challenges to building better theory about technology and organizing. Information and Organization, 18(3), 159-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2008.03.001
    [Google Scholar]
37. Madsen, D. Ø. (2019). The emergence and rise of Industry 4.0 viewed through the lens of management fashion theory. Administrative Sciences, 9(3), 71. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci9030071
    [Google Scholar]
38. Markus, M. L., & Silver, M. S. (2008). A foundation for the study of IT effects: A new look at DeSanctis and Poole’s concepts of structural features and spirit. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 9(10), 5. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00176
    [Google Scholar]
39. Morgan, J. (2019). Will we work in twenty-first century capitalism? A critique of the fourth industrial revolution literature. Economy and Society, 48(3), 371-398. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2019.1620027
    [Google Scholar]
40. Nambisan, S. (2017). Digital entrepreneurship: Toward a digital technology perspective of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(6), 1029-1055. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12254
    [Google Scholar]
41. Norman, D. (2013). The design of everyday things (Revised and expanded edition). Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Orlikowski, W. J. (1992). The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science, 3(3), 398-427. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.3.3.398
    [Google Scholar]
43. Orlikowski, W. J. (2000). Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science, 11(4), 404-428. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.11.4.404.14600
    [Google Scholar]
44. Orlikowski, W. J. (2007). Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization Studies, 28(9), 1435-1448. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607081138
    [Google Scholar]
45. Orlikowski, W. J., & Iacono, C. S. (2001). Research commentary: Desperately seeking the “IT” in IT research—A call to theorizing the IT artifact. Information Systems Research, 12(2), 121-134. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.12.2.121.9700
    [Google Scholar]
46. Oztemel, E., & Gursev, S. (2020). Literature review of Industry 4.0 and related technologies. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 31(1), 127-182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-018-1433-8
    [Google Scholar]
47. Parker, S. K., & Grote, G. (2022). Automation, algorithms, and beyond: Why work design matters more than ever in a digital world. Applied Psychology, 71(4), 1171-1204. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12241
    [Google Scholar]
48. Pfeiffer, S. (2017). The vision of “Industrie 4.0” in the making – a case of future told, tamed, and traded. Nanoethics, 11(1), 107-121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-016-0280-3
    [Google Scholar]
49. Pinch, T., & Swedberg, R. (2008). Living in a material world: Economic sociology meets science and technology studies (Vol. 1). The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Pot, F. (2024). Technologie en kwaliteit van de arbeid in 40 jaar Tijdschrift voor Arbeidsvraagstukken. Tijdschrift voor Arbeidsvraagstukken, 40(3), 304-339. https://doi.org/10.5117/TVA2024.3.004.POT
    [Google Scholar]
51. Rejeb, A., Keogh, J. G., Leong, G. K., & Treiblmaier, H. (2021). Potentials and challenges of augmented reality smart glasses in logistics and supply chain management: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Production Research, 59(12), 3747-3776. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2021.1876942
    [Google Scholar]
52. Scott Poole, M., & DeSanctis, G. (1992). Microlevel structuration in computersupported group decision making. Human Communication Research, 19(1), 5-49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1992.tb00294.x
    [Google Scholar]
53. Spinuzzi, C. (2005). The methodology of participatory design. Technical Communication, 52(2), 163-174.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Vereycken, Y., Van Herreweghe, D., & Ramioul, M. (2022). Sociale dialoog bij technologische innovatie in België: Een Delphi-studie bij de sociale partners. Tijdschrift voor Arbeidsvraagstukken, 38(3), 385-416. https://doi.org/10.5117/TVA2022.3.005.VERE
    [Google Scholar]
55. Vereycken, Y., Guisset, A., & Ramioul, M. (2024). The same but different: Understanding variation and similarity in the outcomes of a similar technology. A comparative case study on the deployment of manufacturing execution systems in three Belgian SME’s. Information and Organization, 34(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2024.100539
    [Google Scholar]
56. Williams, M. D., Rana, N. P., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2015). The unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): a literature review. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 28(3), 443-488. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-09-2014-0088
    [Google Scholar]
57. Xu, X., Lu, Y., Vogel-Heuser, B., & Wang, L. (2021). Industry 4.0 and Industry 5.0 – Inception, conception and perception. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 61, 530-535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.10.006
    [Google Scholar]
58. Zammuto, R. F. (2008). Accreditation and the globalization of business. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 7(2), 256–268. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2008.32712623
    [Google Scholar]
59. Zheng, T., Ardolino, M., Bacchetti, A., & Perona, M. (2021). The applications of Industry 4.0 technologies in manufacturing context: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Production Research, 59(6), 1922–1954. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1824085
    [Google Scholar]
60. Zuidhof, N., Ben Allouch, S., Peters, O., & Verbeek, P-P. (2021). Defining smart glasses: A rapid review of state-of-the-art perspectives and future challenges from a social sciences’ perspective. Augmented Human Research, 6(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41133-021-00053-3
    [Google Scholar]