2004
  1. Home
  2. Publicaties
  3. Tijdschrift voor Arbeidsvraagstukken
  4. Volume 42, Nummer 1
  5. Artikel
Volume 42, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0169-2216
  • E-ISSN: 2468-9424
file format pdf download PDF

Samenvatting

Samenvatting

In deze studie staat de vraag centraal onder welke werkomstandigheden medewerkers in de ouderenzorg optimaal en duurzaam kunnen presteren. Met behulp van het Demand-Induced Strain Compensation Recovery Model is de relatie tussen drie typen werkkenmerken en duurzame arbeidsprestatie onderzocht: (1) taakeisen, (2) hulpbronnen in het werk, en (3) herstelmogelijkheden na het werk (detachment). Aan de hand van een cross-sectioneel vragenlijstonderzoek zijn vragenlijsten verstuurd naar zorgmedewerkers werkzaam in 24 verpleeghuislocaties. Aan dit onderzoek werkten in totaal 707 respondenten mee. De resultaten lieten zien dat cognitieve taakeisen positief samenhangen met duurzame arbeidsprestatie, en dat deze relatie versterkt wordt door zowel cognitieve hulpbronnen als cognitieve detachment. Verder kwam naar voren dat emotionele taakeisen negatief samenhangen met duurzame arbeidsprestatie, en dat deze relatie vooral aanwezig is in geval van de combinatie van (1) weinig emotionele hulpbronnen en veel emotionele detachment, en (2) veel emotionele hulpbronnen en weinig emotionele detachment. Empirische ondersteuning werd gevonden voor het matchprincipe dat stelt dat interacties het vaakst zullen optreden indien er overeenstemming bestaat tussen het type taakeis, het type hulpbron en het type herstel. Duurzame werkomgevingen in de ouderenzorg gaan idealiter over het handhaven van een gezond evenwicht tussen matchende taakeisen, hulpbronnen en herstel teneinde duurzame arbeidsprestatie te bevorderen.

© Jan de Jonge, Toon W. Taris & Jan P. H. Hamers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/TVA2026.1.004.JONG
2026-03-01
2026-03-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/01692216/42/1/TVA2026.1.004.JONG.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5117/TVA2026.1.004.JONG&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Barnes, C. M., Wagner, D. T., Schabram, K., & Boncoeur, D. (2023). Human sustainability and work: A meta-synthesis and new theoretical framework. Journal of Management, 49(6), 1965-1996. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063221131541
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Campbell, J. P., McCloy, R. A., Oppler, S. H., & Sager, C. E. (1993). A theory of performance. In E.Schmitt, & W. C.Borman (Reds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 35-70). Jossey-Bass.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Cavanaugh, M. A., Boswell, W. R., Roehling, M. V., & Boudreau, J. W. (2000). An empirical examination of self-reported work stress among U.S. managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(1), 65-74. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.1.65
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek. (2023). Opnieuw meer werknemers in zorg en welzijn, ondanks grotere uitstroom. Geraadpleegd op 7mei2025, van https://www.cbs.nl/nl-nl/nieuws/2023/34/opnieuw-meer-werknemers-in-zorg-en-welzijn-ondanks-grotere-uitstroom
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek. (2025a). Bevolkingspiramide. Geraadpleegd op 7mei2025, van https://www.cbs.nl/nl-nl/onze-diensten/leren-met-het-cbs/gereedschappen/bevolkingspiramide
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek. (2025b). Ziekteverzuimpercentage; AZW branches. Geraadpleegd op 7mei2025, van https://azwstatline.cbs.nl/#/AZW/nl/dataset/24015NED/table?dl=A753E
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Dawson, J. F. (2014). Moderation in management research: What, why, when, and how. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-013-9308-7
     [Google Scholar]
  8. De Jonge, J., Backhaus, R., & Hamers, J. P. H. (2024). Managing vitality, sustainable performance, and fatigue in nursing home staff: A multi-location cross-sectional survey study. Nursing Open, 11, e70052. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.70052
     [Google Scholar]
  9. De Jonge, J., & Dormann, C. (2006). Stressors, resources, and strain at work: A longitudinal test of the Triple Match Principle. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1359-1374. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.1359
     [Google Scholar]
  10. De Jonge, J., & Dormann, C. (2017). Why is my job so stressful? Characteristics, processes, and models of stress at work. In N.Chmiel, F.Fraccaroli, & M.Sverke (Reds.), An introduction to work and organisational psychology: An international perspective (3e ed.) (pp. 80-101). Wiley-Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. De Jonge, J., & Peeters, M. C. W. (2019). The vital worker: Towards sustainable performance at work. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16, 910. https://doi/org/10.3390/ijerph16060910
     [Google Scholar]
  12. De Jonge, J., & Peeters, M. C. W. (2025). At work with sustainable well-being and sustainable performance: Testing the DISC Model among office workers. Sustainability, 17, 643. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17020643
     [Google Scholar]
  13. De Jonge, J., Sonnentag, S., & Spoor, E. M. B. (2011). Off-job recovery: Detachment from work (DISQ-R Version 1.3 NL). Eindhoven University of Technology.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. De Jonge, J., Spoor, E., Sonnentag, S., Dormann, C., & Van den Tooren, M. (2012). “Take a break?!”: Off-job recovery, job demands and job resources as predictors of health, active learning, and creativity. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 21(3), 321-348. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2011.576009
     [Google Scholar]
  15. De Jonge, J., Willemse, B., Van Iperen, L., & Gevers, J. (2018). DISQ-S 3.1 NL - De Verkorte DISC Vragenlijst Nederlandse Versie 3.1. Technische Universiteit Eindhoven.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. De Jonge, J.Wouters, M., Peeters, M. C. W., & Taris, T. W. (2020). Employee Sustainable Performance (SuPer) Scale NL Version 1.1. Eindhoven University of Technology & Utrecht University.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. De Jonge, J., Zijlstra, F. R. H., & Sluiter, J. K. (2010). Nu even niet…!: Over herstel bij arbeid. Gedrag & Organisatie, 23(4), 259-274.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Demerouti, E., & Bakker, A. B. (2024). Job crafting: A powerful job redesign approach. In M.Peeters, J.de Jonge, & T.Taris (Reds.), An Introduction to Contemporary Work Psychology, Second Edition (pp. 524-542). Wiley-Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Docherty, P., Forslin, J., & Shani, A. B. (2002). Creating Sustainable Work Systems: Emerging Perspectives and Practice. Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Dorenbosch, L. (2014). Striking a balance between work effort and resource regeneration. In I.Ehnert, W.Harry, & K. J.Zink (Reds.), Sustainability and Human Resource Management (pp. 155-180). Springer-Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Etzion, D., Eden, D., & Lapidot, Y. (1998). Relief from job stressors and burnout: Reserve service as a respite. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 577-585. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0021-9010.83.4.577
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Eurofound (2015). Sustainable Work over the Life Course: Concept Paper. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Federatie Nederlandse Vakbeweging (2023). FNV Zorg & Welzijn slaat alarm: Nieuwe cijfers wijzen op dreigend zorginfarct. Geraadpleegd op 7mei2025, van https://www.fnv.nl/nieuwsbericht/sectornieuws/zorg-welzijn/2023/12/fnv-zorg-welzijn-slaat-alarm-nieuwe-cijfers-wijzen
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Goodman, S. A., & Svyantek, D. J. (1999). Person-organization fit and contextual performance: Do shared values matter. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 55, 254-275. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1998.1682
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Hayes, A. F., & Coutts, J. J. (2020). Use Omega rather than Cronbach’s Alpha for estimating reliability. But…Communication Methods and Measures, 14(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2020.1718629
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Hinkema, M., Van Heumen, S., & Van Wissekerke, N. E. (2019). Prognose capaciteitsontwikkeling verpleeghuiszorg (TNO 2019 R12033). TNO.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Hockey, G. R. J. (2000). Work environments and performance. In N.Chmiel (Red.), Introduction to work and organizational psychology: A European perspective (pp. 206-230). Blackwell Publishers.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Jaccard, J., Turrisi, R., & Wan, C. K. (1990). Interaction effects in multiple regression. Sage.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Ji, T., De Jonge, J., Peeters, M. C. W., & Taris, T. W. (2021). Employee Sustainable Performance (E-SuPer): Theoretical conceptualization, scale development, and psychometric properties. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18, 10497. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph181910497
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Ji, T., De Jonge, J., Peeters, M. C. W., & Taris, T. W. (2024). Matching job demands and job resources as linear and non-linear predictors of employee vigor and sustainable performance. Human Performance, 37(3), 81-99. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2024.2332683
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Kira, M., & Lifvergren, S. (2014). Sowing seeds for sustainability in work systems. In I.Ehnert, W.Harry, & K. L.Zink (Reds.), Sustainability and Human Resource Management (pp. 56-82). Springer-Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Kompier, M. A. J., & Kristensen, T. S. (2001). Organizational work stress interventions in a theoretical, methodological and practical context. In J.Dunham (Red.), Stress in the workplace: Past, present and future (pp. 164-190). Whurr Publishers.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Kooij, D. T. A. M., Kanfer, R., Betts, M., & Rudolph, C. W. (2018). Future time perspective: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(8), 867-893. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000306
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Korbus, H., Hildebrand, C., Schott, N., Bischoff, L., Otto, A. K., Jöllenbeck, T., Schoene, D., Voelcker-Rehage, C., Vogt, L., Weigelt, M., & Wollesen, B. (2023) Health status, resources, and job demands in geriatric nursing staff: A cross-sectional study on determinants and relationships. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 145, 104523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2023.104523.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. LePine, M. A. (2022). The Challenge-Hindrance Stressor Framework: An integrative conceptual review and path forward. Group & Organization Management, 47(2), 223-254. https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011221079970
     [Google Scholar]
  36. McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Lawrence Erlbaum.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. McEwen, B. S. (1998). Stress, adaptation, and disease: Allostasis and allostatic load. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 840, 33-44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1998.tb09546.x
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Niks, I. M. W., De Jonge, J., Gevers, J. M. P., & Houtman, I. L. D. (2018). Work stress interventions in hospital care: Effectiveness of the DISCovery method. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15, 332. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15020332
     [Google Scholar]
  39. NU’91 (2023). NU’91 zet de ‘Zorg op Zwart’. Geraadpleegd op 7mei2025, van https://nu91.nl/nieuws/221-nu-91-zet-de-zorg-op-zwart
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Oeij, P. R. A., & Dhondt, S. (2024). Reviewing workplace innovation as a plea for a practical approach. Sociology Compass, 18(4), e13203, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.13203
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Pindek, S., Meyer, K., Valvo, A., & Arvan, M. (2024). A dynamic view of the Challenge-Hindrance Stressor Framework: A meta-analysis of daily diary studies. Journal of Business and Psychology, 39, 1107-1125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-024-09933-y
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Podsakoff, N. P., Freiburger, K. J., Podsakoff, P. M., & Rosen, C. C. (2023). Laying the foundation for the challenge-hindrance stressor framework 2.0. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 10(1), 165-199. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-080422-052147
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Podsakoff, P. M., Podsakoff, N. P., Williams, L. J., Huang, C., & Yang, J. (2024). Common method bias: It’s bad, it’s complex, it’s widespread, and it’s not easy to fix. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 11(1), 17-61. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-110721-040030
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Revelle, W. (2023). Using R and the psych package to find ω. Department of Psychology, Northwestern University.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Sociaal-Economische Raad. (2023). Naar verdere succesvolle toepassing van sociale innovatie (Advies 23/03).
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Sonnentag, S., Cheng, B. H., & Parker, S. L. (2022). Recovery from work: Advancing the field toward the future. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 9, 33-60. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012420-091355
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Sonnentag, S., & Fritz, C. (2015). Recovery from job stress: The stressor-detachment model as an integrative framework. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(S1), S72-S103. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1924
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Taris, A. W. (2015). Longitudinal data analysis in occupational health psychology. Taylor & Francis.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Taris, T., & Ji, T. (2024). Work performance. In M.Peeters, J.de Jonge, & T.Taris (Reds.), An Introduction to Contemporary Work Psychology, Second Edition (pp. 440-459). Wiley-Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Thapa, D. R., Stengard, J., Ekström-Bergström, A., Josefsson, K. A., Krettek, A., & Nyberg, A. (2022). Job demands, job resources, and health outcomes among nursing professionals in private and public healthcare sectors in Sweden. BMC Nursing, 21, 140. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-022-00924-z
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Van Dijk, Y., Janus, S. I., De Boer, M. R., Achterberg, W. P., Roelen, C. A., & Zuidema, S. U. (2022). Job demands, work functioning and mental health in Dutch nursing home staff during the COVID-19 outbreak: A cross-sectional multilevel study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19, 4379. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19074379
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Wouters, M. (2020). The operationalization of sustainable work performance: The creation and testing of a new sustainable work performance (SuPer) scale. [Bachelor Thesis]. Eindhoven University of Technology.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Wetenschappelijke Raad voor het Regeringsbeleid. (2021). Kiezen voor houdbare zorg: Mensen, middelen en maatschappelijk draagvlak (WRR-Rapport 104).
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.5117/TVA2026.1.004.JONG
Loading
Determinanten van duurzame arbeidsprestatie bij werknemers in de ouderenzorg
TA 42, 59 (2026); https://doi.org/10.5117/TVA2026.1.004.JONG
/content/journals/10.5117/TVA2026.1.004.JONG
/content/journals/10.5117/TVA2026.1.004.JONG
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Soort artikel: Research Article
Keyword(s): DISC-R Model; elderly care; job characteristics; recovery; sustainable work performance

Meest geciteerd Most Cited RSS feed

Dit is een verplicht veld
Graag een geldig e-mailadres invoeren
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error