Wanneer de taalklok vijf voor twaalf slaat

References

1. Bauman & Briggs2003 – R.Bauman & C.Briggs, Voices of Modernity. Language Ideologies and the Politics of Inequality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bernstein1990 – B.Bernstein, Class, Codes and Control, Vol. IV: The Structuring of Pedagogic Discourse. Londen/New York: Routledge, 1990.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Blommaert1999 – J.Blommaert, ‘The debate is open’. In: J.Blommaert (ed.), Language Ideological Debates. Berlijn: Mouton de Gruyter, 1999, p. 1-38.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Blommaert2011 – J.Blommaert, ‘The long language-ideological debate in Belgium’. In: Journal of Multicultural Discourses6 (2011) 3, p. 241-256. doi: 10.1080/17447143.2011.595492
   [Google Scholar]
5. Blommaert & Verschueren1992a – J.Blommaert & J.Verschueren, ‘The role of language in European nationalist ideologies’. In: Pragmatics2 (1992) 3, p. 355-375. doi: 10.1075/prag.2.3.13blo
   [Google Scholar]
6. Blommaert & Verschueren1992b – J.Blommaert & J.Verschueren, Het Belgische migrantendebat. De pragmatiek van de abnormalisering. Antwerpen: International Pragmatics Association, 1992.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Blommaert e.a. 2000 – J.Blommaert, F.Brisard, C.Bulcaen, H.Daniëls, S.D’hondt, G.Eelen, J.Jaspers, M.Meeuwis, R.Senoussi & J.Verschueren, ‘Sociolinguïstiek en pragmatiek: de studie van ideologieën omtrent meertaligheid’. In: S.Gillis, J.Nuyts & J.Taeldeman (red.), Met taal om de tuin geleid. Opstellen voor Georges De Schutter. Antwerpen: UIA, 2000, p. 37-48.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Blommaert, Creve & Willaert2006 – J.Blommaert, L.Creve & E.Willaert, ‘On being declared illiterate: Language-ideological disqualification in Dutch classes for immigrants in Belgium’. In: Language and Communication26 (2006) 1, p. 34-53. doi: 10.1016/j.langcom.2005.03.004
   [Google Scholar]
9. Bollen & Baten2010 – K.Bollen & K.Baten, ‘Bilingual Education in Flanders: Policy and Press Debate (1999-2006)’. In: The Modern Language Journal94 (2010) 3, p. 412-433. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2010.01089.x
   [Google Scholar]
10. Bourdieu1982 – P.Bourdieu, Ce que parler veut dire. L’économie des échanges linguistiques. Parijs: Fayard, 1982.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Braun & Clarke2006 – V.Braun & V.Clarke, ‘Using thematic analysis in psychology’. In: Qualitiative Research in Psychology3 (2006), p. 77-101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
    [Google Scholar]
12. Bucholtz & Hall2004 – M.Bucholtz & K.Hall, ‘Language and Identity’. In: A.Duranti (ed.), A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology. Malden: Blackwell, 2004, p. 369-394.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Chilton1997 – P.A.Chilton, ‘The Role of Language in Human Conflict: Prolegomena to the Investigation of Language as a Factor in Conflict Causation and Resolution’. In: Current Issues in Language and Society4 (1997) 3, p. 174-189. doi: 10.1080/13520529709615497
    [Google Scholar]
14. Cenoz2013 – J.Cenoz, ‘Defining Multilingualism’. In: Annual Review of Applied Linguistics33 (2013), p. 3-18. doi: 10.1017/S026719051300007X
    [Google Scholar]
15. Darquennes2015 – J.Darquennes, ‘Language conflict research: a state of the art’. In: The International Journal of the Sociology of Language235 (2015), p. 7-32. doi: 10.1515/ijsl-2015-0012
    [Google Scholar]
16. De Caluwe2012 – J.De Caluwe, ‘Dutch in Belgium: Facing multilingualism in a context of regional monolingualism and Standard Language Ideology’. In: M.Hüning, U.Vogl, & O.Moliner (eds.), Standard Languages and Multilingualism in European History. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2012, p. 259-282.
    [Google Scholar]
17. De Groof2004 – J.De Groof, Nederlandse taalplanning in Vlaanderen in de lange negentiende eeuw (1795-1914). Een linguïstische analyse met speciale aandacht voor de wisselwerking tussen status- en corpusplanning. Doctoraatsverhandeling, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 2004.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Delarue & De Caluwe2015 – S.Delarue & J.De Caluwe, ‘Eliminating social inequality by reinforcing standard language ideology? Language policy for Dutch in Flemish schools’. Current Issues in Language Planning16 (2015) 1-2, p. 8-25. doi: 10.1080/14664208.2014.947012
    [Google Scholar]
19. Deneckere, De Wever & De Paepe2012 – G.Deneckere, B.De Wever & T.De Paepe, Een geschiedenis van België. Gent: Academia Press, 2012.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Deprez1999 – K.Deprez, ‘De taal van de Vlamingen’. In: K.Deprez & L.Vos (red.), Nationalisme in België. Identiteiten in beweging (1780-2000). Antwerpen: Houtekiet, 1999, p. 103-116.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Deutsch1966 – K.W.Deutsch, Nationalism and Social Communication. An Inquiry into the Foundations of Nationality. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1966.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Duchêne & Heller2007 – A.Duchêne & M.Heller, Discourses of Endangerment: Ideology and Interest in the Defence of Languages. Londen: Continuum, 2007.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Fairclough1992 – N.Fairclough, Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Fairclough2003 – N.Fairclough, Analysing Discourse: Text Analysis for Social Research. Londen/New York: Routledge, 2003.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Fairclough & Wodak1997 – N.Fairclough & R.Wodak, ‘Critical Discourse Analysis’. In: T.Van Dijk (ed.), Discourse as Social Interaction. Londen: Sage, 1997, p. 258-284.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Francard1998 – M.Francard, ‘La légitimité linguistique passe-t-elle par la reconnaissance d’une variété « nationale »? Le cas de la communauté française de Wallonie-Bruxelles’. In: Revue québécoise de linguistique26 (1998) 2, p. 13-23. doi: 10.7202/603149ar
    [Google Scholar]
27. Gal1989 – S.Gal, ‘Language and political economy’. In: Annual Review of Anthropology18 (1989), p. 345-367. doi: 10.1146/annurev.an.18.100189.002021
    [Google Scholar]
28. Gal1993 – S.Gal, ‘Diversity and contestation in linguistic ideologies: German speakers in Hungary’. In: Language in Society22 (1993) 3, p. 337-359. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500017279
    [Google Scholar]
29. Gal1998 – S.Gal, ‘Multiplicity and Contention among Language Ideologies. A Commentary’. In: B.B.Schieffelin, K.A.Woolard & P.V.Kroskrity (eds.), Language Ideologies. Practice and Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998, p. 317-331.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Gal2011 – S.Gal, ‘Polyglot nationalism. Alternative perspectives on language in 19th century Hungary’. In: Langage et Société136 (2011) 2, p. 31-54. doi: 10.3917/ls.136.0031
    [Google Scholar]
31. Gal & Irvine1995 – S.Gal & J.Irvine, ‘The boundaries of language and disciplines: How ideologies construct difference’. In: Social Research62 (1995) 4, p. 967-1001.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Giddens1979 – A.Giddens, Central Problems in Social Theory. Londen: Macmillan, 1979.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Gee2005 – J.P.Gee, An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method. Londen/New York: Routledge, 2005.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Gee2016 – J.P.Gee, ‘Discourse analysis matters: bridging frameworks’. In: Journal of Multicultural Discourses11 (2016) 4, p. 343-359. doi: 10.1080/17447143.2016.1226316
    [Google Scholar]
35. Gevers1975 – L.Gevers, ‘Het Nederlands als vak en voertaal in het katholiek middelbaar onderwijs van het aartsbisdom Mechelen en het bisdom Brugge – 1864-1893’. In: De groote stooringe 1875. Historische bijdragen tot de geschiedenis van de Vlaamse studentenbeweging. Roeselare: Concordia, 1975, p. 181-270.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Hambye2009 – P.Hambye, ‘Plurilinguisme et minorisation en Belgique: d’étranges rapports aux langues « étrangères »’. In: Langage et société129 (2009) 3, p. 29-46. doi: 10.3917/ls.129.0029
    [Google Scholar]
37. Hambye & Richards2012 – P.Hambye & M.Richards, ‘The paradoxical visions of multilingualism in education: the ideological dimension of discourses on multilingualism in Belgium and Canada’. In: International Journal of Multilingualism9 (2012) 2, p. 165-188. doi: 10.1080/14790718.2011.644558
    [Google Scholar]
38. Hanson1990 – M.Hanson, Van Frans naar Nederlands. De taalsituatie in het Limburgs middelbaar onderwijs 1830-1914 [Maaslandse Monografieën xlix]. Leeuwarden/Maastricht: Eisma, 1990.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Heller & McElhinny2017 – M.Heller & B.McElhinny, Language, Capitalism, Colonialism: Towards a Critical History. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Hobsbawm1990 – E.Hobsbawm, ‘The transformation of nationalism, 1870-1918’. In: E.Hobsbawm, Nations and Nationalism since 1780: Programme, Myth, Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990, p. 101-130.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Horner2011 – K.Horner, ‘Media representations of multilingual Luxembourg. Constructing language as a resource, problem, right and duty’. In: Journal of Language and Politics10 (2011) 4, p. 491-510. doi: 10.1075/jlp.10.4.02hor
    [Google Scholar]
42. Hroch1968 – M.Hroch, Die Vorkämpfer der nationalen Bewegung bei den kleinen Völkern Europas. Eine vergleichende Analyse zur gesellschaftlichen Schichtung der patriotischen Gruppen. Praag: Universita Karlova, 1968.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Hult & Hornberger2016 – F.M.Hult & N.H.Hornberger, ‘Revisiting Orientations in Language Planning: Problem, Right, and Resource as Analytical Heuristic’. In: The Bilingual Review/La Revista Bilingüe33 (2016) 3, p. 30-49.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Irvine1989 – J.Irvine, ‘When Talk Isn’t Cheap: Language and Political Economy’. In: American Ethnologist16 (1989) 2, p. 248-267.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Irvine2001 – J.Irvine, ‘“Style” as distinctiveness: the culture and ideology of linguistic differentiation’. In: P.Eckert & J.R. Rickford (eds.), Style and Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001, p. 2-43.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Irvine & Gal2000 – J.Irvine & S.Gal, ‘Language Ideology and Linguistic Differentiation’. In: P.V.Kroskrity (ed.), Regimes of Language. Ideologies, polities and identities. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press, 2000, p. 35-84.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Jaffe2007 – A.Jaffe, ‘Discourses of Endangerment: Contexts and Consequences of Essentializing Discourses’. In: A.Duchêne & M.Heller (eds.), Discourses of Endangerment: Ideology and Interest in the Defence of Languages. Londen: Continuum, 2007, p. 57-75.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Jaffe2009 – A.Jaffe, ‘The Production and Reproduction of Ideologies in Practice’. In: N.Coupland & A.Jaworski (eds.), The New Sociolinguistics Reader. New York: Palgrave, 2009, p. 390-403.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Janssens2012 – R.Janssens, ‘The Linguistic Landscape as a Political Arena. The Case of the Brussels periphery in Belgium’. In: C.Hélot, M.Barni, R.Janssens, & C.Bagna (eds.), Linguistic Landscapes, Multilingualism and Social Change. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 2012, p. 39-52.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Janssens2015 – R.Janssens, ‘Language conflict in Brussels: political mind-set versus linguistic practice’. In: International Journal of the Sociology of Language42 (2015) 5, p. 53-76. doi: 10.1515/ijsl-2015-0014
    [Google Scholar]
51. Janssens2018a – R.Janssens, Meertaligheid als opdracht. Een analyse van de Brusselse taalsituatie op basis van taalbarometer4. Brussel: VUB Press, 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Janssens2018b – R.Janssens, ‘The impact of mobility and migration on the identity-constructing policy in Brussels’. In: P.A.Kraus & F.Grin (eds.), The politics of multilingualism: Europeanisation, globalisation and linguistic governance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2018, p. 65-87.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Jaspers2009 – J.Jaspers, De klank van de stad: stedelijke meertaligheid en interculturele communicatie. Leuven: Acco, 2009.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Jaspers2011 – J.Jaspers, ‘Talking like a “zerolingual”: Ambiguous caricatures at an urban secondary school’. In: Journal of Pragmatics43 (2011) 5, p. 1264-1278. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.05.012
    [Google Scholar]
55. Jaspers2012 – J.Jaspers, ‘Het Algemeen Nederlands: uw sociale zekerheid? Taalgebruik en taalopvattingen in processen van in-en uitsluiting’. In: K.Absillis, J.Jaspers & S.Van Hoof, (red.), De manke usurpator: over verkavelingsvlaams. Gent: Academia Press, 2012, p. 371-395.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Jaspers2015 – J.Jaspers, ‘Tussen meervoudige vuren: de implementatie van eentalig taalbeleid in een context van taaldiversiteit’. In: Pedagogische Studiën92 (2015) 5, p. 344-360.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Jaspers & Madsen2016 – J.Jaspers & L.M.Madsen, ‘Sociolinguistics in a languagised world: Introduction’. In: Applied Linguistics Review7 (2016) 3, p. 235-258. doi: 10.1515/applirev-2016-0010
    [Google Scholar]
58. Johnson & Milani2010 – S.A.Johnson & T.M.Milani, Language Ideologies and Media Discourse: Texts, Practices, Politics. Londen, New York: Continuum, 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Kamusella2018 – T.Kamusella, ‘Nationalism and national languages’. In: J.W.Tollefson & M.Pérez-Milans (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Language Policy and Planning. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018, p. 163-182.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Kesteloot1997 – C.Kesteloot, ‘Être ou vouloir être. Le cheminement difficile de l’identité walonne’. In: Bijdragen tot de Eigentijdse Geschiedenis3 (1997), p. 181-201.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Koppen, Distelmans & Janssens2002 – J.Koppen, B.Distelmans & R.Janssens, Taalfaciliteiten in de Rand: ontwikkelingslijnen, conflictgebieden en taalpraktijk. Brussel: VUB Press, 2002.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Krämer, Vogl & Kolehmainen2022 – P.Krämer, U.Vogl & L.Kolehmainen, ‘What is “Language Making”?’. In: International Journal of the Sociology of Language48 (2022) 2, p. 1-27. doi: 10.1515/ijsl-2021-0016
    [Google Scholar]
63. Kroskrity2000 – P.V.Kroskrity, Regimes of Language. Oxford: Currey, 2000.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Kroskrity2004 – P.V.Kroskrity, ‘Language Ideologies’. In: A.Duranti (ed.), A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology. Malden: Blackwell, 2004, p. 496-517. doi: 10.1002/9780470996522.ch22
    [Google Scholar]
65. Leerssen2006 – J.Leerssen, ‘Nationalism and the cultivation of culture’. In: Nations and nationalism12 (2006) 4, p. 559-578. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8129.2006.00253.x
    [Google Scholar]
66. Lippi-Green2007 – R.Lippi-Green, English with an accent: language, ideology, and discrimination in the United States. Londen/New York: Routledge, 2007.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Mautner2016 – G.Mautner, ‘Checks and balances: How corpus linguistics can contribute to CDA’. In: R.Wodak & M.Meyer (eds.), Methods of critical discourse studies. Londen: Sage, 2016, p. 154-179.
    [Google Scholar]
68. Mettewie2020 – L.Mettewie, ‘Wordt Nederlands een verplicht vak in Wallonië?’ In: Neerlandia124 (2020) 1, p. 30-31.
    [Google Scholar]
69. Mettewie & Van Mensel2020 – L.Mettewie & L.Van Mensel, ‘Understanding foreign language education and bilingual education in Belgium: a (surreal) piece of cake’. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. doi: 10.1080/13670050.2020.1768211
    [Google Scholar]
70. Milroy2001 – J.Milroy, ‘Language ideologies and the consequences of standardization’. In: Journal of Sociolinguistics5 (2001) 4, p. 530-555. doi: 10.1111/1467-9481.00163
    [Google Scholar]
71. Nelde1994 – P.H.Nelde, ‘Language in Contact and Conflict: The Belgian Experience and the European Union’. In: Current Issues in Language and Society1 (1994) 2, p. 165-182.
    [Google Scholar]
72. Nelde1997 – P.H.Nelde, ‘Language conflict’. In: F.Coulmas (ed.), The Handbook of Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Blackwell, 1997, p. 285-300.
    [Google Scholar]
73. Perrez & Reuchamps2015 – J.Perrez & M.Reuchamps, ‘Folle machine ou solide relation « living apart together » ?. Le rôle des métaphores dans la perception citoyenne du fédéralisme belge’. In: Mots. Les langages du politique [online] 109 (2015). doi: 10.4000/mots.22156
    [Google Scholar]
74. Potvin, Morelli & Mettewie2004 – M.Potvin, A.Morelli & L.Mettewie, ‘Du racisme dans les rapports entre groupes nationaux au Canada et en Belgique?’ In: G.Bourgeault & M-H.Chastenay (eds.), Ethnic relations and education in divided societies. Comparing Belgium and Canada. Relations ethniques et éducation dans les sociétés divisées. Comparaison Belgique-Canada. Calgary: Canadian Ethnic Studies, 2004, p. 25-60.
    [Google Scholar]
75. RindlerSchjerve2003 – R.Rindler Schjerve, ‘Kontakt- und Konfliktlinguistik im Wandel’. In: K.Bochmann, P.H.Nelde & W.Wölck (eds.), Methodology in Conflict Linguistics (Plurilingua XXIV). St. Augustin: Asgard, 2003, p. 47-58.
    [Google Scholar]
76. Rosa2016 – J.D.Rosa, ‘Standardization, Racialization, Languagelessness: Raciolinguistic Ideologies across Communicative Contexts’. In: Journal of Linguistic Anthropology26 (2016) 2, p. 162-183. doi: 10.1111/jola.12116
    [Google Scholar]
77. Ruíz1984 – R.Ruíz, ‘Orientations in Language Planning’. In: NABE Journal8 (1984) 2, p. 15-34. doi: 10.1080/08855072.1984.10668464
    [Google Scholar]
78. Rumsey1990 – A.Rumsey, ‘Wording, meaning and linguistic ideology’. In: American Anthropologist92 (1990) 2, p. 346-351. doi: 10.1525/aa.1990.92.2.02a00060
    [Google Scholar]
79. Saul2017 – J.M.Saul, ‘Racial Figleaves, the Shifting Boundaries of the Permissible, and the Rise of Donald Trump’. In: Philosophical Topics45 (2017) 2, p. 97-116. doi: 10.5840/philtopics201745215
    [Google Scholar]
80. Silverstein1979 – M.Silverstein, ‘Language structure and linguistic ideology’. In: P.R.Clyne, W.F.Hanks & C.L.Hofbauer (eds.), The Elements: A Parasession on Linguistic Units and Levels. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, 1979, p. 193-247.
    [Google Scholar]
81. Sinardet2007 – D.Sinardet, ‘Het samenleven van twee onderdrukte meerderheden. Vlamingen, Franstaligen en de media’. In: G.Buelens, D.Van Reybrouck & J.Goossens (red.), Waar België voor staat: een toekomstvisie. Amsterdam: Meulenhoff/Manteau, 2007, p. 27-37.
    [Google Scholar]
82. Spitzmüller, Busch & Flubacher2021 – J.Spitzmüller, B.Busch & M-C.Flubacher, ‘Language ideologies and social positioning: the restoration of a “much needed bridge”’. In: International Journal for the Sociology of Language47 (2021) 5, p. 1-12. doi: 10.1515/ijsl-2020-0094
    [Google Scholar]
83. Thompson1991 – J.B.Thompson, Ideology and Modern Culture. Critical Social Theory in the Era of Mass Communication. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1990.
    [Google Scholar]
84. Tibbaut, Vandenbussche & Saeys2020 – A.Tibbaut, W.Vandenbussche & M.Saeys, Meertaligheid in Brussel. Mapping en analyse van meertalige initiatieven in het Brussels Hoofdstedelijk Gewest. Cartographie et analyse des initiatives en matière de multilinguisme en Région de Bruxelles-Capitale. Onderzoeksrapport voor de regering van het Brussels Hoofdstedelijk Gewest, in opdracht van de minister van Promotie van meertaligheid, 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
85. Urciuoli1995 – B.Urciuoli, ‘Language and Borders’. In: Annual Review of Anthropology24 (1995), p. 525-546. doi: 10.1146/annurev.an.24.100195.002521
    [Google Scholar]
86. Van den Berg & Couttenier2009 – W.van den Berg & P.Couttenier, Alles is taal geworden. Geschiedenis van de Nederlandse literatuur 1800-1900. Amsterdam: Bert Bakker, 2009.
    [Google Scholar]
87. Vandenbussche2001 – W.Vandenbussche, ‘Nederlands als prestigetaal voor de Brugse upper class in de 19e eeuw?’ In: Verslagen en Mededelingen van de Koninklijke Academie voor Nederlandse Taal- en Letterkunde111 (2001) 2, p. 129-146.
    [Google Scholar]
88. Vandenbussche2004 – W.Vandenbussche, ‘Triglossia and pragmatic variety choice in nineteenth-century Bruges. A case study in historical sociolinguistics’. In: Journal of Historical Pragmatics5 (2004) 1, p. 27-47.
    [Google Scholar]
89. Van der Horst2008 – J.Van der Horst, Het einde van de standaardtaal. Een wisseling van Europese taalcultuur. Amsterdam: Meulenhoff, 2008.
    [Google Scholar]
90. Van de Velde2020 – F.Van de Velde, ‘Zegeningen en schaduwzijden van taaldiversiteit’. In: I.Goddeeris, N.Lie & S.Marzo (red.), Interculturaliteit en de Geesteswetenschappen. Over grenzen, beelden en taal. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 2020, p. 211-240.
    [Google Scholar]
91. Van Dijk1988 – T.A.Van Dijk, News as Discourse. Londen/New York: Routledge, 1988.
    [Google Scholar]
92. Van Ginderachter2005a – M.Van Ginderachter, Le Chant du Coq: nation et nationalisme en Wallonie depuis 1880. Gent: Academia Press, 2005.
    [Google Scholar]
93. Van Ginderachter2005b – M.Van Ginderachter, Het rode vaderland. De vergeten geschiedenis van de communautaire spanningen in het Belgische socialisme voor WOI. Tielt: Lannoo, Gent: AMSAB-ISG, 2005.
    [Google Scholar]
94. Van Goethem1990 – H.Van Goethem, Taaltoestanden in het Vlaams-Belgisch gerecht, 1795-1935. Brussel: Koninklijke Academie voor Wetenschappen, Letteren en Schone Kunsten van België, 1990.
    [Google Scholar]
95. Vanhecke & De Groof2007 – E.Vanhecke & J.De Groof, ‘New data on language policy and language choice in 19th-century Flemish city administrations’. In: S.Elspaß, N.Langer, J.Scharloth & W.Vandenbussche (eds.), Germanic Language Histories ‘from below’ (1700-2000). Berlijn: De Gruyter, 2007, p. 449-470.
    [Google Scholar]
96. Van Hoof & Jaspers2012 – S.Van Hoof & J.Jaspers, ‘Hyperstandaardisering’. In: Tijdschrift voor Nederlandse Taal- en Letterkunde181 (2012) 1, p. 97-125.
    [Google Scholar]
97. Van Mensel2016 – L.Van Mensel, ‘Children and choices: the effect of macro language policy on the individual agency of transnational parents in Brussels’. In: Language Policy15 (2016) 4, p. 547-560. doi: 10.1007/s10993-015-9391-x
    [Google Scholar]
98. Van Velthoven2005 – H.Van Velthoven, ‘De opbouw van een Brusselse identiteit. Naar een Brussels Gewest-Gemeenschap?’ In: WT. Tijdschrift over de geschiedenis van de Vlaamse beweging64 (2005) bijzonder nummer, p. 58-79. doi: 10.21825/wt.v64i.12712
    [Google Scholar]
99. Verschueren2011 – J.Verschueren, ‘Language use and ideology’. In: J.Verschueren, Ideology in Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011, p. 7-20.
    [Google Scholar]
100. Vierendeels2019 – I.Vierendeels, Een land van twee mentale minderheden. Een diachroon en vergelijkend corpusonderzoek naar het meertaligheidsdiscours in de Vlaamse en Waalse geschreven pers. Masterscriptie. Universiteit Gent, 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
101. Vierendeels, Mettewie & Vogl te verschijnen – I.Vierendeels, L.Mettewie & U.Vogl, ‘Miss Belgium, Coca-Cola and Flemish carwashes. Mapping discourses on “multilingualism” by the Dutch- and French-medium written press in Belgium’. In: Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics, te verschijnen.
     [Google Scholar]
102. Vogl2012 – U.Vogl, ‘Multilingualism in a standard language culture’. In: M.Hüning, U.Vogl, & O.Moliner (eds.), Standard Languages and Multilingualism in European HistoryAmsterdam: John Benjamins, 2012, p. 1-42.
     [Google Scholar]
103. Vogl & Hüning2010 – U.Vogl & M.Hüning, ‘One Nation, One Language? The Case of Belgium’. In: Dutch Crossing34 (2010) 3, p. 228-247. doi: 10.1179/030965610X12820418688570
     [Google Scholar]
104. Wils1974 – L.Wils, Flamenpolitik en aktivisme. Vlaanderen tegenover België in de Eerste Wereldoorlog. Leuven: Davidsfonds, 1974.
     [Google Scholar]
105. Wils1991 – L.Wils, ‘L’emploi des langues en matières judiciaires et administratives dans le royaume de Belgique’. In: Revue du Nord289 (1991), p. 51-71.
     [Google Scholar]
106. Wils2009 – L.Wils, Van de Belgische naar de Vlaamse natie: een geschiedenis van de Vlaamse Beweging. Leuven: Acco, 2009.
     [Google Scholar]
107. Witte & Verhulst s.d. – E.Witte & A.Verhulst, ‘Liberale Partij’. https://nevb.be/wiki/Liberale_partij; online geraadpleegd op 23augustus2022.
     [Google Scholar]
108. Witte & Van Velthoven2010 – E.Witte & H.Van Velthoven, Strijden om taal. De Belgische taalkwestie in historisch perspectief. Kapellen: Pelckmans, 2010.
     [Google Scholar]
109. Wodak2001 – R.Wodak, ‘The discourse-historical approach’. In: R.Wodak & M.Meyer (eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Studies. Londen: Sage, 2001, p. 63-94.
     [Google Scholar]
110. Wodak & Meyer2016 – R.Wodak & M.Meyer, ‘Critical Discourse Studies: History, Agenda, Theory and Methodology’. In: R.Wodak & M.Meyer (eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Studies. Third Edition. Londen: Sage, 2016, p. 1-22.
     [Google Scholar]
111. Woolard1992 – K.A.Woolard, ‘Language ideology: Issues and approaches’. In: Pragmatics2 (1992) 3, p. 235-249. doi: 10.1075/prag.2.3.01woo
     [Google Scholar]
112. Woolard1998 – K.A.Woolard, ‘Language Ideology as a Field of Inquiry’. In: B.B.Schieffelin, K.A.Woolard & P.V.Kroskrity (eds.), Language Ideologies. Practice and Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998, p. 3-47.
     [Google Scholar]
113. Woolard & Schieffelin1994 – K.A.Woolard & B.B.Schieffelin, ‘Language Ideology’. In: Annual Review of Anthropology23 (1994) 1, p. 55-82. doi: 10.1146/annurev.an.23.100194.000415
     [Google Scholar]
114. Zoltberg1974 – A.R.Zoltberg, ‘The Making of Flemings and Walloons: Belgium: 1830-1914’. In: The Journal of Interdisciplinary History5 (1974) 2, p. 179-235.
     [Google Scholar]