2004
Volume 93, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 0025-9454
  • E-ISSN: 1876-2816

Abstract

Summary

The central thesis of this article is that the formal institutions of the Dutch neo-corporatist model appear to display a remarkable stability and continuity, but that their actual functioning goes through a gradual transformation, whereby the system has essentially changed its character and has been eroded. First of all, the stability and continuity of the most important formal institutions of Dutch neo-corporatism since the Second World War is described. A number of developments are then outlined that indicate that the model is nevertheless subject to erosion in practice. These include a (contract) wage development that lags far behind productivity developments, the passing on of risks by companies to the employees and a growing number of collective agreements lacking the signature of the largest trade union(s). While the formal rules of the game have largely remained the same, the game of labor relations has changed dramatically in recent decades. As a result, the balance of power between trade unions and employers has changed strongly in favour of the employers.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/MEM2018.3.003.BEER
2018-08-01
2021-09-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/00259454/93/3/03_MEM2018.3.BEER.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5117/MEM2018.3.003.BEER&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Beer, P. de(2013). Een verplichte bijdrage voor de cao. In K.Van der Veldt & M.Wirtz (red.), Ontwerpers in arbeidsverhoudingen. Draagvlak van de cao. Den Haag: AWVN.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Beer, P. de(2016). Afbrokkelende legitimiteit van het poldermodel. In M.Keune, M. (red.), Nog steeds een mirakel? De legitimiteit van het Poldermodel in de 21ste eeuw. Amsterdam: AUP.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Crouch, C.(1993). Industrial relations and European state traditions. Oxford: Clarendon.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Engelen, E.(2016). De keerzijde van het polderwonder. In M.Keune, M. (red.), Nog steeds een mirakel? De legitimiteit van het Poldermodel in de 21ste eeuw. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Esping-Andersen, G.(1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Esping-Andersen, G. (ed.) (1996). Welfare states in transition. London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Gestel, N. van, Beer, P. de & Meer, M. van der(2009). Het hervormingsmoeras van de verzorgingsstaat. Veranderingen in de organisatie van de sociale zekerheid. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Hall, P.A. & Soskice, D. (eds.) (2001)Varieties of capitalism. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Hemerijck, A. & Meer, M. van der(2016). Nieuw Nederlands polderen: Van brede sociale akkoorden naar ‘ad hoc’ hervormingscoalities. In M.Keune (red.) Nog steeds een mirakel? De legitimiteit van het Poldermodel in de 21ste eeuw. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Katzenstein, P.(1985). Small states in world markets: Industrial policy in Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Keune, M.(2016)Inleiding: De legitimiteit van het poldermodel in de eenentwintigste eeuw. In M.Keune (red.), Nog steeds een mirakel? De legitimiteit van het Poldermodel in de 21ste eeuw. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Kremer, M., Bovens, M., Schrijvers, E. & Went, R. (red.) (2014). Hoe ongelijk is Nederland? Een verkenning van de ontwikkeling en gevolgen van economische ongelijkheid. WRR-Verkenningen 
nr. 28. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Lendering, J.(2005)Polderdenken. De wortels van de Nederlandse overlegcultuur. Amsterdam: Athenaeum-Polak & Van Gennep.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Leupen, J. (2018, 1 maart). FNV verliest in moordend tempo positie aan cao-tafel. Het Financieele Dagblad, 1 maart 2018 [https://fd.nl/economie-politiek/1244181/fnv-verliest-in-​moordend-​
tempo-​positie-aan-cao-tafel]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Meer, M. van der & Visser, J.(2010)Doing together what is possible: Social pacts and negotiated welfare reform in the Netherlands. In Ph.Pochet, M.Keune & D.Natali, D. (red.), After the Euro and enlargement: Social pacts in the EU, Brussels: ETUI.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Pierson, P.(1994). Dismantling the welfare state? Reagan, Thatcher and the politics of retrenchment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Prak, M. & Luiten van Zanden, J.(2013). Nederland en het poldermodel. Amsterdam: Uitgeverij Bert Bakker.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Schmitter, Ph.(1974). Still the century of corporatism?The Review of Politics, 36(1), 85-131.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Schmitter, Ph. & Lehmbruch, G.(1979). Trends towards corporatism intermediation. Londen: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Streeck, W.(1992). Social institutions and economic performance: Studies of industrial relations in advanced capitalist economies. Londen: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Streeck, W.(2009). Re-forming capitalism. Institutional change in the German political economy. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Streeck, W. & Thelen, K.(2005). Introduction: Institutional change in advanced political economies. In W.Streeck & K.Thelen (red.), Beyond continuity: Institutional change in advanced political economies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Traxler, F.(1995). Two logics of collective action in industrial relations? In C.Crouch & F.Traxler (red.), Organised industrial relations in Europe: What future?Aldershot, Avebury.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Troost, N. (2012, 25 juni). ‘Dit kunnen we niet langer aanzien’ (interview met Ton Heerts), 
de Volkskrant 25 juni 2012. [https://www.volkskrant.nl/archief/-dit-kunnen-we-niet-langer-
aanzien~a3276347/]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Tros, F., Albeda, W. & Dercksen, W.(2006). Arbeidsverhoudingen in Nederland. 7de druk. Deventer: Kluwer.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Valk, P. van der(2016). Cao onder druk? Onderzoek naar ontwikkelingen van collectieve arbeidsverhoudingen in relatie tot de cao. Publicatie 11 van het Wetenschappelijk Bureau voor de Vakbeweging. Amsterdam: de Burcht.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Verhoeff, A., Tros, F., Beer, P. de & Hazen, J.(2017). Kracht van branches. Den Haag/Amsterdam: AWVN/Amsterdams Instituut voor ArbeidsStudies.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Visser, J. & Hemerijck, A.(1998). Een Nederlands mirakel: Beleidsleren in de verzorgingsstaat. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Windmuller, J.P., Galan, C. de, & Zweeden, A.F. van(1987). Arbeidsverhoudingen in Nederland. Aula Pocket 731. Utrecht: Het Spectrum.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/MEM2018.3.003.BEER
Loading
/content/journals/10.5117/MEM2018.3.003.BEER
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): institutional change; neo-corporatism; Polder model; social partners; trade unions

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error