2004
Volume 95, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 0025-9454
  • E-ISSN: 1876-2816

Abstract

Abstract

This article explores two parallel strategies that could enhance a shift towards becoming a sustainable society. Such a transition requires major changes in lifestyle and coexistence and can only be achieved with extensive public support. We argue that innovative practices of democratic deliberation and strengthening a (g)local gaze could generate such much needed public support because they both involve citizens as critical co-creators in tangible processes of change. Both strategies depart from the everyday life-world experiences of people in their own living environments but also challenge them to resituate their personal concerns in broader planetary perspectives.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/MEM2020.3.005.SURA
2020-08-01
2021-09-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Appadurai, A.(2013). The Future as Cultural Fact. Essays on the global condition. New York/London: Verso.
  2. Audier, S.(2019). L’Âge productiviste: hégémonie prométhéenne, brèches et alternatives écologiques. Paris: La Découverte.
  3. Blakeley, G.(2014). Conflict and Deliberation, in: Elstub & McLaverty (2014), Deliberative Democracy. Issues and Cases (pp.17-34). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bohman, J. F.(1998). The Coming of Age of Deliberative Democracy. Journal of Political Philosophy, 6/4, 400-425.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Descola, P.(2019). Pourquoi la ZAD compose des mondes? Entretien avec Philippe Descola. In Schaffner, M. (2019). Un sol commun. Lutter, habiter, penser (pp.151-159). Paris: Collection le monde qui vient.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Elstub, S. & McLaverty, P. (red.)(2014). Deliberative Democracy. Issues and Cases. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  7. Escobar, A.(2018). Designs for the Pluriverse. Radical Interdependence, Autonomy and the Making of Worlds. Durham/London: Duke University Press.
  8. Giesen, P.(2019). De democratie verruwt. De Volkskrant, 28/12/2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Graeber, D.(2014). The Democracy Project. A History. A Crisis. A Movement. London: Penguin.
  10. Korthals, M.(2018). Goed eten. Filosofie van voeding en landbouw. Nijmegen: Van Tilt.
  11. Latour, B.(2017). Ou atterrir? Comment s’orienter en politique?Paris: La Découverte.
  12. Latour, B. (2018a). Waar kunnen wij landen? Politieke oriëntaties in het nieuwe klimaatregime. Amsterdam: Octavo.
  13. Latour, B. (2018b). Une Terre sans peuple, des peuples sans terre. Entretien avec Bruno Latour par Camille Riquier, Esprit, 441, 145-152.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Mannion, G.(2015). Towards Glocal Pedagogies: Some Risks Associated with Education for Global Citizenship and how Glocal Pedagogies might avoid them. In Friedman et al. (red.), Going Glocal in Higher Education. The Theory, Teaching and Measurement of Global Citizenship (pp.19-34). Middelburg: De Drvkkery.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Manzini, E.(2015). Design. When everybody Designs: An introduction to Design for Social Change. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press.
  16. McLaverty, P.(2014). Inequality and Deliberative Democracy. In S.Elstub & P.McLaverty (red.), Deliberative Democracy. Issues and Cases (pp. 34-50). Edinburg: Edinburg University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Mouffe, C.(2009). Deliberative Democracy or Agonistic Pluralism, Wien: Reihe Politikwissenschaft.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Mouffe, C.(2018). For a Left Populism. London/New York: Verso.
  19. Nida-Rümelin, J.(2006). Demokratie und Wahrheit. München: Beck.
  20. Nino, C.(1996). The Constitution of Deliberatieve Democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  21. Oomen, B.(2015). Introduction: Education for Glocal Citizenship. In Friedman et al. (red.). Going Glocal in Higher Education. The Theory, Teaching and Measurement of Global Citizenship (pp.9-18). Middelburg: De Drvkkery.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Remkes, J.(2018). Lage drempels, hoge dijken. Democratie en rechtsstaat in balans. Eindrapport van de staatscommissie parlementair stelsel. Amsterdam: Boom.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Ridder, J. den & Dekker, P.(2015). Meer democratie, minder politiek? Een studie van de publieke opinie in Nederland. Den Haag: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau.
  24. Romero, F.M.(2019). Agir ici et maintenant. Penser l’écologie sociale de Murray Bookchin. Rennes: Éditions du Commun.
  25. Rosa, H.(2019). Demokratie und Gemeinwohl. Versuch einer resonanztheoretischen Neubestimmung. In H.Ketterer & K.Becker (red.). Was stimmt nicht mit der Demokratie (pp. 160-189). Berlin: Suhrkamp.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Rosanvallon, P.(2020). Le Siècle du Populisme. Histoire, théorie, critique. Paris: Seuil.
  27. Rosanvallon, P.(2018). Good Government. Democracy Beyond Elections. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press.
  28. Rosenberg, S.(2014). Citizen Competence and the Psychology of Deliberation. In: S.Elstub & P.McLaverty (red.). Deliberative Democracy. Issues and Cases (pp.98-118). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Schinkel, W.(2013). De nieuwe democratie. Naar andere vormen van politiek. Amsterdam: Bezige Bij.
  30. Setälä, M.(2014). The Public Sphere as a Site of Deliberation. An Analysis of Problems of Inclusion. In S.Elstub & P.McLaverty (red.). Deliberative Democracy. Issues and Cases (pp.149-166). Edinburgh: University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Tocqueville, A. de(2011). Over Democratie in Amerika (1835/1840), Rotterdam, Lemniscaat.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Žižek, S.(2014). Absolute Recoil. Towards a New Foundation of Dialectical Materialism. London: Verso.
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/MEM2020.3.005.SURA
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): deliberation; glocal; local; public support; sustainability

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error