Betekenisvolle statistiek met Reinharz, McCloskey en McCall | Amsterdam University Press Journals Online
2004
Volume 98 Number 3
  • ISSN: 0025-9454
  • E-ISSN: 1876-2816
Preview this article:

There is no abstract available.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/MEM2023.3.008.SPIE
2023-09-01
2024-07-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Betkó, J.G. (2023). Effects of welfare policies based on autonomy and unconditionality: A social experiment with social assistance recipients (Doctoral dissertation, Radboud University, Sl: sn).
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Hofstra, B., Kulkarni, V. V., Munoz-Najar Galvez, S., He, B., Jurafsky, D., en McFarland, D. A. (2020). The diversity–innovation paradox in science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(17), 9284-9291.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. McCall, L. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs: Journal of women in culture and society, 30(3), 1771-1800.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. McCloskey, D.N. (1999). Crossing: A memoir. University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. McCloskey, D.N., & Ziliak, S.T. (1996). The standard error of regressions. Journal of economic literature, 34(1), 97-114.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Reinharz, S. (with assistance of LynnDavidman) (1992). Feminist methods in social research. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Spierings, N. (2023). Quantitative intersectional research: approaches, practices, and needs. In K.Davis en H.Lutz (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Intersectionality Studies. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/MEM2023.3.008.SPIE
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error