f Saba Mahmood en de nieuwe sociologische canon: secularisme, politieke ethiek en macht

References

1. Bangstad, S. (2011). Saba Mahmood and anthropological feminism after virtue. Theory, Culture & Society, 28(3), 28-54. https://doi.org/10.1177/02632764103969
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bracke, S. (2008). Conjugating the Modern/ Religious, Conceptualizing Female Religious Agency: Contours of a `Post-secular’ Conjuncture. Theory, Culture & Society, 25(6), 51-67.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Butler, J. (2019). Thinking with Saba Mahmood. Critical Times, 2(1), 5-9. https://doi.org/10.1215/26410478-7769710
   [Google Scholar]
4. Kapur, R. (2019). The radical intellectual legacy of Saba Mahmood. Radical Philosophy, 205, 48–53.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Laidlaw, J. (2013). The subject of virtue: An anthropology of ethics and freedom. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139236232
   [Google Scholar]
6. Mahmood, S. (2001). Feminist theory, embodiment, and the docile agent: Some reflections on the Egyptian Islamic revival. Cultural anthropology, 16(2), 202-236. https://www.jstor.org/stable/656537
   [Google Scholar]
7. Mahmood, S. (2009). Reply to Judith Butler. In T.Asad, W.Brown, J.Butler & S.Mahmood (Eds.), Is critique secular? Blasphemy, injury, and free speech (pp. 146-153). Berkley: University of California Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Mahmood, S, (2011). Politics of Piety: The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvct00cf
   [Google Scholar]
9. Mahmood, S. (2015). Religious difference in a secular age: A minority report. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvc77k82
   [Google Scholar]
10. Shitrit, L. B. (2015). Righteous transgressions: Women’s activism on the Israeli and Palestinian religious right. Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvc77jvt
    [Google Scholar]