2004
Volume 41, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 1567-7109
  • E-ISSN: 2468-1652

Abstract

Samenvatting

In dit artikel onderzoek ik of de standaardbenaderingen van burgerschapsonderwijs in de Lage Landen geschikt zijn om jonge mensen voor te bereiden om de huidige politieke realiteiten tegemoet te treden, laat staan om onrecht te bestrijden. Ik laat zien waarom een nadruk op ‘democratische principes’ of de rechtsstaat de status quo waarschijnlijk niet zal veranderen zolang opvoeders er niet in slagen de aandacht voor de waarheid te cultiveren die nodig is om te kunnen oordelen over rivaliserende normatieve claims. Met name op tolerantie gebaseerde interpretaties van burgerschap zullen weinig bereiken in afwezigheid van burgerlijke deugden – vooral moreel oordelen en morele moed – die nodig zijn voor . omvat minimaal een bereidheid om de waarheid te spreken tegen de macht. Maar het ernstigste probleem betreffende burgerschapsonderwijs op school betreft de legitimiteit ervan, gegeven dat dat onderwijs gebaseerd is op een door de overheid opgelegd curriculum met als doel een gewenste respons op de boodschap ervan op te leggen en te conditioneren. Daardoor staat het per definitie vijandig tegenover .

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/PED2021.3.004.MERR
2021-10-01
2022-01-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/15677109/41/3/PED2021.3.004.MERR.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5117/PED2021.3.004.MERR&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Banks, J. (2015). Failed citizenship, civic engagement, and education. Kappa Delta Pi Record51(4), 151-154.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Brighouse, H. (1998). Civic education and liberal legitimacy. Ethics108(4), 719-745.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Calarco, J. M. (2018). Negotiating opportunities: How the middle class secures advantages in school. New York: Oxford University Press.
  4. Cohen, A. & Bekerman, Z. (2021). The (non-)political classroom: The dismissed opportunities of an Israeli multicultural bilingual high school civics course. The Journal of Social Studies Research. Online First.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Collins, P. H. (2002). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. Routledge.
  6. Danhier, J. & Jacobs, D. (2017). Segregatie in het onderwijs overstijgen. Analyse van de resultaten van het PISA2015-onderzoek in Vlaanderen en in de Federatie Wallonië. Brussel. Koning Boudewijnstichting.
  7. Dassonneville, R. et al. (2012). The relation between civic education and political attitudes and behavior: A two-year panel study among Belgian late adolescents. Applied Developmental Science16(3), 140-150.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Dotson, K. (2011). Tracking epistemic violence, tracking practices of silencing. Hypatia26(2), 236-257.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Dumont, H., Klinge, D., & Maaz, K. (2019). The many (subtle) ways parents game the system: Mixed method evidence on the transition into secondary-school tracks in Germany. Sociology of Education92(2), 199-228.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Fehrman, D. & Schutz, A. (2011). Beyond the Catch-22 of School-Based Social Action Programs: Toward a More Pragmatic Approach for Dealing with Power. Democracy and Education19(1), Article 3. Available at: https://democracyeducationjournal.org/home/vol19/iss1/3
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Francis, B. and Mills, M. (2012). Schools as damaging organisations: Instigating a dialogue concerning alternative models of schooling. Pedagogy, Culture & Society20(2), 251-271.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  13. Geboers, E., Admiraal, W., Geijsel, F. & ten Dam, G. (2015). Citizenship orientations and knowledge in primary and secondary education. Social Psychology and Education18(4), 749-767.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Goodman, P. (1962). Compulsory mis-education. New York: Vintage.
  15. Gutmann, A. (1999). Democratic education. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  16. Hattie, J. (2002). Classroom composition and peer effects. International Journal of Educational Research37(5), 449-481.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Hand, M. (2006). Against autonomy as an educational aim. Oxford Review of Education32(4), 535-550.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Harrison, D. (2020). De geschiedenis van de slavernij. Van Mesopotamië tot moderne mensenhandel. Utrecht: Omniboek.
  19. Heggart, K. R. & Flowers, R. (2019). Justice Citizens, Active Citizenship, and Critical Pedagogy: Reinvigorating Citizenship Education. Democracy and Education27(1), Article 2. Available at: https://democracyeducationjournal.org/home/vol27/iss1/2
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Herweijer, L. & Vogels, R. (2004). Ouders over opvoeding en onderwijs. Den Haag: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau.
  21. Hess, D. (2009). Controversy in the classroom: The democratic power of discussion. New York: Routledge.
  22. Hodgson, D. (2018). Disciplining the conduct of young people in compulsory education policy and practice. Discourse: studies in the cultural politics of education39(1), 1-14.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Jackson, P. (1968). Life in classrooms. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
  24. Knight-Abowitz, K. & Mamlok, D. (2021). #NeverAgainMSD student activism: Lessons for agonist political education in an age of democratic crisis. Educational Theory70(6), 731-748.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Leander, K. M. (2002). Silencing in classroom interaction: Producing and relating social spaces. Discourse Processes34(2), 193-235.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Legewie, J. & Fagan, J. (2019). Aggressive policing and the educational performance of minority youth. American Sociological Review84(2), 220-247.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Locher Scholton, E. B. (2017). Nederlandse koloniale geschiedenis1595-1975. Amsterdam: Unieboek / Het Spectrum.
  28. Locke, J. (1796). A letter concerning toleration. Huddersfield: J. Brook.
  29. Loewen, J. (2018). Teaching what really happened: How to avoid the tyranny of textbooks and get students excited about doing history. New York: Teachers College Press.
  30. Mallett, C. (2017). The school-to-prison pipeline: Disproportionate impact on vulnerable children and adolescents. Education and Urban Society49(6), 563-592.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Merry, M. S. (2018). Citizenship, Structural Inequality and the Political Elite. On Education: journal for research and debate1(1): 1-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Merry, M. S. (2020). Educational justice: Liberal ideals, persistent inequality and the constructive uses of critique. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  33. Merry, M. S. (2021). Is faith in school integration bad faith?On Education. Journal for Research and Debate4(11). https://doi.org/10.17899/on_ed.2021.11.2
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Merry, M. S. & Boterman, W. (2020). Educational Inequality and State-Sponsored Elite Schools: the case of the Dutch gymnasium. Comparative Education56(4), 522-546.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Merry, M. S. & Schinkel, A. (2021). What is an Appropriate Educational Response to Historical Monuments?Journal of Philosophy of Education55(3), 484-497.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Mill, J. S. (1978) [1859]. On liberty. Indianapolis: Hackett.
  37. Miller, M (2020). Encouraging Student Dissent in the Classroom. Educational Leadership77(6), 44-48.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Mouffe, C. (2000). The democratic paradox. London, New York: Verso.
  39. Noll, J. van der, Poppe, E. & Verkuyten, M. (2010). Political tolerance and prejudice: Differential reactions toward Muslims in the Netherlands. Basic and Applied Social Psychology32(1), 46-56.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Perry, B. & Morris, E. W. (2014). Suspending progress: Collateral consequences of exclusionary punishment in public schools. American Sociological Review79(6), 1067-1087.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Pomeranz, K. (2005). Empire & ‘civilizing’ missions, past & present. Daedalus134(2), 34-45.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Prisma Woordenboek: Engels-Nederlands. Utrecht, 2007.
  43. Pulinx, R., Avermaet, P. & Agirdag, O. (2017). Silencing linguistic diversity: The extent, the determinants and the consequences of the monolingual beliefs of Flemish teachers. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism20(5), 542-556.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Pyne, J. (2018). Suspended Attitudes: exclusion and emotional disengagement from school. Sociology of Education92(1), 59-82.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Quong, J. (2010). Liberalism without perfection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  46. Reay, D. (2017). Miseducation: Inequality, education and the working classes. London: Policy Press.
  47. Riele, K. T. (2006). Youth ‘at risk’: Further marginalized the marginalized?Journal of Education Policy21(2), 129-146.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Sætra, E. (2021). Discussing Controversial Issues: Exploring the Role of Agonistic Emotions. Democracy and Education29(1), Article 3. Available at: https://democracyeducationjournal.org/home/vol29/iss1/3
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Swaine, L. (2020). Ethical autonomy: The rise of self-rule. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  50. Van Houtte, M. (2004). Tracking effects on school achievement: A quantitative explanation in terms of the academic culture of school staff. American Journal of Education110(4), 354-388.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Vervaet, R., D'hondt, F., Van Houtte, M., & Stevens, P. A. (2016). The ethnic prejudice of Flemish teachers: The role of ethnic school composition and of teachability. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology22(4), 552-562.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Walzer, M. (1997). On toleration. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  53. Wheeler-Bell, Q. (2018). Broken glass: The social evil of urban poverty and a critical education. Educational Policy33(7), 1076-1102.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/PED2021.3.004.MERR
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error