oa Searching, Selecting, and Verifying: Online Journalistic Sourcing Strategies

References

1. Barnoy, A., & Z.Reich. (2019). The when, why how and so-what of verifications. Journalism Studies, 20(16), 2312–2330.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Boukes, M., & Vliegenthart, R. (2017). A general pattern in the construction of economic newsworthiness? Analyzing news factors in popular, quality, regional, and financial newspapers. Journalism, 21(2), 279–300.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Caplan, R., & D.Boyd. (2018). Isomorphism through Algorithms: Institutional Dependencies in the Case of Facebook. Big Data & Society5 (1). doi: 205395171875725.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Brandtzaeg, P. B., Følstad, A., & Ángeles Chaparro Domínguez, M. (2018). How Journalists and Social Media Users Perceive Online Fact-Checking and Verification Services. Journalism Practice, 12(9), 1109-1129.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Brandtzaeg, P.B., Lüders, M., Spangenberg, J., Rath-Wiggins, L., & Følstad, A. (2016). Emerging Journalistic Verification Practices Concerning Social Media. Journalism Practice, 10 (3), 323-342.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Broersma, M., & Graham, T. (2013). Twitter as a news source: how Dutch and British newspapers used tweets in their news coverage, 2007-2011. Journalism Practice, 7, 446-464.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Churchill, E. F. (2013). Putting the Person Back into Personalization. Interactions, 20(5), 12–15
   [Google Scholar]
8. De Haan, Y., Van den Berg, E., Goutier, N., Kruikemeier, S., & Lecheler, S. (2022) Invisible Friend or Foe? How Journalists Use and Perceive Algorithmic-Driven Tools in Their Research Process, Digital Journalism, 10(10), 1775-1793.
   [Google Scholar]
9. DeVito, M. (2016). From editors to algorithms: a values-based approach to understanding story selection in the Facebook news feed. Digital journalism, 5(6), 753-773.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Diakopoulos, N., Trielli, D., Stark, J., & MussendenS. (2018). I Vote For—How search informs our choice of candidate. In M.Moore & D.Tambini (Eds.), Digital Dominance: The Power of Google, Amazon, Facebook, and Apple, (pp. 320-341). Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Diakopoulos, N. (2015). Algorithmic cccountability. Digital Journalism, 3(3), 398-415.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Diaz, A. (2008). Through the Google goggles: sociopolitical bias in search engine design. In A.Spink and M.Zimmer (Eds.), Web search: Multidisciplinary perspectives. Springer series in information sciences and knowledge management, (pp. 11-34). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Diekerhof, E. (2023). Changing journalistic information-gathering practices? Reliability in everyday information gathering in high-speed Newsrooms, Journalism Practice, 17(3), 411-428.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Diekerhof, E., & Bakker, P. (2012). To check or not to check: an exploratory study on source checking by Dutch journalists. Journal of applied journalism & media studies, 1(2), 241-253.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Duffy, A. & Tan Rui Si, J. (2018). Naming the dog on the Internet. Digital Journalism, 6(7), 910-927.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Egelhofer, J. L. & Lecheler, L. (2019). Fake news as a two-dimensional phenomenon: a framework and research agenda. Annals of the International Communication Association, 43(2), 97-116.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Ekström, M., Lewis, S. C., & Westlund, O. (2020). Epistemologies of digital journalism and the study of misinformation. New Media & Society, 22(2), 205–212.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Epstein. R. (2018). Manipulating Minds: the Power of Search Engines to Influence Votes and Opinions. In M.Moore & D.Tambini (Eds.), Digital Dominance: The Power of Google, Amazon, Facebook, and Apple, (pp. 294-319). Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Eveland, Jr, William P., & Dunwoody, S. (2000). Examining information processing on the World Wide Web using think aloud protocols. Media Psychology, 2(3), 219-244.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Fletcher, R., & Park, S. (2017). The impact of trust in the news media on online news consumption and participation. Digital Journalism, 5(10), 1281-1299.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Fink-Shamit, N., & Bar-Ilan, J. (2008). Information quality assessment on the web: an expression of behaviour. Information Research, 13(4), paper 357. Retrieved from http://InformationR.net/ir/13-4/paper357.html.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Fretwurst, B.2015. Lotus Manual: Reliability and Accuracy with SPSS. Zurich (Switserland): Institut für angewandte Kommunikationsforschung. Retrieved from http://www.iakom.ch/Lotus/LotusManualEng.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
23. Gillespie, T. (2014). The relevance of algorithms. In T.Gillespie, P.Boczkowski & K.Foot (Eds.), Media Technologies (pp. 167-193). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Gillespie, T. (2017). “Algorithmically recognizable: Santorum’s Google problem, and Google’s Santorum problem..”Information, Communication & Society, 20(1), 63-80.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Godler, Y., and Reich, Z. (2017). “ournalistic evidence: Cross-verification as a constituent of mediated knowledge. Journalism18(5), 558–574.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Grosser, K. M., Hase, V. and Wintterlin, F. (2019). “Trustworthy or shady?”Journalism Studies, 20(4), 500-522.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Harcup, T. and ONeill, D. (2017). What is news? News values revisited (again). Journalism Studies, 18(12), 1470-1488.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Harcup, T. and O’Neill, D. (2001). What is news? Galtung and Ruge revisited. Journalism Studies2(2), 261–280.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Hermida, A. (2012). Tweets and truth: journalism as a discipline of collaborative verification. Journalism practice, 6(5-6), 659-668.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Hermida, A. (2015). Nothing but the truth: redrafting the journalistic boundary of verification. In M.Carlson & S.Lewis (Eds.), Boundaries of journalism, professionalism, practice and participation, (pp. 37-50). New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Hermida, A.S.Lewis, and R.Zamith. (2014). Sourcing the Arab Spring: a case study of Andy Carvin’s sources on Twitter during the Tunisian and Egyptian Revolutions. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(3), 479–499.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Hornmoen, H., Backholm, K., Larsen, A. G., Högväg, J., Ausserhofer, J., Frey, E., and Reimerth, G. (2017). Crises, rumours and reposts: journalists’ social media content gathering and verification practices in breaking news Situations. Media and Communication, 5(2), 67-76.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Keane, M.T., M.O’Brien, and B.Smyth. (2008). Are people biased in their use of search engines?Communications of ACM, 51(2), 49-52.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Kovach, B. & Rosenstiel, T. (2021). The Elements of Journalism: What Newspeople Should Know and the Public Should Expect. New York: Three Rivers Press. 4th edition.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Lecheler, S., Kruikemeier, S. and de Haan, Y. (2019). The use and verification of online sources in the news production process. In Katz, E. J. & Mays, K. K. (Eds), Journalism and Truth in an Age of Social Media (pp. 167-181). Oxford Scholarship.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Lecheler, S. and S.Kruikemeier. 2016. Re-evaluating journalistic routines in a digital age: a review of research on the use of online sources. New media & Society, 18(1), 156-171.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Lewis, J., A.Williams, and B.Franklin. (2008). Four rumours and an explanation: A political economic account of journalists’ changing newsgathering and reporting practices. Journalism Practice, 2(1), 27–45.
    [Google Scholar]
38. MachillM. and M.Beiler. (2009). The importance of the internet for journalistic research: a multimethod study of the research performed by journalists working for daily newspapers, radio, television and online. Journalism Studies, 10(2), 178–203.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Möller, J., Trilling, D., Helberger, N., van Es, B. (2020). Do not blame it on the algorithm: an empirical assessment of multiple recommender systems and their impact on content diversity. In M.Beaufort (Ed.). Digital Media, Political Polarization, and challenges to democracy. (pp. 45-63). London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Newman, N., R.Fletcher, A.Kalogeropoulos, D.Levy, and R.Klein Nielsen. (2017). Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2017. Reuters Institute for the study of journalism. Retrieved from https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/Digital%20News%20Report%202017%20web_0.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Pan, B., H.Hembrooke, T.Joachims, L.Lorigo, G.Gay, and L.Granka. (2007). In Google we trust: users’ decisions on rank, position, and relevance. Journal of computer mediated communication, 12(3), 801-823.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Paulussen, S. and R.Harder. (2014). Social media references in newspapers: Facebook, Twitter and YouTube as sources in newspaper journalism. Journalism Practice, 8(5), 542–551.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Puschmann, C. (2019). Beyond the bubble: assessing the diversity of political search results. Digital Journalism, 7(6), 824-843.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Reich, Z. (2011). Source credibility and journalism: between visceral and discretional judgment. Journalism practice, 5(1), 51-67.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Schifferes, S., N.Newman, N.Thurman, D.Corney, A.S.Goker, and C.Martin. (2014). Identifying and verifying news through social media: Developing a user-centred tool for professional journalists. Digital Journalism, 2(3), 406-418.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Schudson, M. and C.Anderson. (2009). News Production and Organizations: professionalism, objectivity and truth-seeking. In K.Wahl-Jorgensen & T.Hanitzsch (Eds.) The Handbook of Journalism Studies, (pp. 88-101). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum, Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Schultz, I. (2007). The journalistic gut feeling?Journalism Practice, 1(2), 190 – 207.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Shapiro, I., C.Brin, I.Bédard-Brûlé, and K.Mychajlowycz. (2013). Verification as a strategic ritual. Journalism Practice, 7(6), 657-673.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Silverman, C. (2014). The verification handbook: a definitive guide to verifying digital content for emergency coverage. Maastricht: European Journalism Centre.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Tameling, K. (2015). En wat doen we online? Crossmediale dilemma’s op Nederlandse nieuwsredacties. Amsterdam: Boom Lemma Uitgevers.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Tashakkori, A., Creswell, J. W. (2007). Editorial. The new era of mixed methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research1(1), 3–7.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Thorsen, E. & Jackson, D. (2018). Seven characteristics defining online news formats. Digital Journalism, 6(7), 847-868.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Thorson, K., and C.Wells. (2016). Curated flows: a framework for mapping media exposure in the digital age. Communication Theory, 26(3), 309–28.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Thurman, N., S.Schifferes, R.Fletcher, N.Newman, S.Hunt, and A.K.Schapals. (2016). Giving computers a nose for news: exploring the limits of story detection and verification. Digital Journalism, 4(7), 838-848.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Trielli, D. and N.Diakopoulos. (2019). Search as news curator: The role of Google in shaping attention to news information. Proc. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI). May, 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Tylor, J. (2015). An examination of how student journalists seek information and evaluate online sources during the newsgathering process. New Media & Society, 17(8), 1277-1298.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Vaidhyanathan, S. (2011). The Googlization of everything: (and why we should worry). Berkeley: The University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Van Hout, T., and F.MacGilchrist. (2010). Framing the news: an ethnographic view of business newswriting. Text & Talk, 30(2), 147-169.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Van Leuven, S., A.Deprez, and K.Raeymaeckers. (2014). Towards more balanced news access? A study on the impact of cost-cutting and Web 2.0 on the mediated public sphere. Journalism, 15(7), 850-867.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Van Leuven, S., S.Kruikemeier, S.Lecheler, and L.Hermans. (2018). “Online snd newsworthy.”Digital Journalism, 6(7), 798-806.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Vis, F. (2013). Twitter as a reporting tool for breaking news: Journalists tweeting the 2011 UK riots. Digital journalism, 1(1), 27-47.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Von Nordheim, G., Boczek, K. & Koppers, L. (2018). Sourcing the sources. Digital Journalism, 6(7), 807-828.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Walker, A. S. (2019). Preparing students for the fight against false information with visual verification and open-source reporting. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 74(2), 227–239.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Willnat, L. & Weaver, D. H. (2018). Social media and U.S. journalists. Digital Journalism, 6(7), 889-909.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Zelizer, B. (2004). When facts, truth, and reality are God-terms: on journalism’s uneasy place in cultural studies. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 1(1), 100-119.
    [Google Scholar]
66. Zelizer, B. (2019). Why Journalism is about more than digital technology. Digital Journalism, 7, 343-350.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Zhang, X. & Li, W. (2019). From social media with news: journalists’ social media use for sourcing and verification”. Journalism Practice. doi: 10.1080/17512786.2019.1689372
    [Google Scholar]