2004
Volume 25, Issue 1
  • E-ISSN: 1388-1302

Abstract

Samenvatting

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/THRM2022.1.JANS
2022-03-01
2022-12-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/13881302/25/1/THRM2022.1.JANS.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5117/THRM2022.1.JANS&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Adler, S., Campion, M., Colquitt, A., Grubb, A., Murphy, K., Ollander-Krane, R., & Pulakos, E. D. (2016). Getting rid of performance ratings: Genius or folly? A debate. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 9(2), 219-252.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. AguinisH, & O’BoyleE. (2014). Star performers in twenty-first-century organizations. Personnel Psychology, 67, 313–350
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Aguinis, H., O’Boyle, E., Gonzalez-Mulé, E., & Joo, H. (2016). Cumulative advantage: Conductors and insulators of heavy-tailed productivity distributions and productivity stars. Personnel Psychology, 69), 3-66.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Balkin, D.B., Markman, G.D., Gomez-Mejia, L.R. (2000). Is CEO pay in high technology firms related to innovation? Academy of Management Journal, 43, 1118-1129.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Belleman, B., & Flink, E. (2020). Hoe gaan we wetenschappers straks ‘erkennen en waarderen’? Ad Valvas, 24september2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bal, P. M. (2020). Why we should stop measuring performance and well-being. Zeitschrift für Arbeits-und Organisationspsychologie, 64, 196-200.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Chin-A-Fo, H., & T.Jaeger (2020). De bestsellercode. NRC, vrijdag 6maart2020, p. C10.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. DeNisi, A. S., & Kluger, A. N. (2000). Feedback effectiveness: Can 360-degree appraisals be improved?. Academy of Management Perspectives, 14, 129-139.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. De Vos, A., Van der Heijden, B. I., & Akkermans, J. (2020). Sustainable careers: Towards a conceptual model. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 117, 103196.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Elms, A. C. (2001). Apocryphal Freud: Sigmund Freud’s most famous “quotations” and their actual sources. Annual of Psychoanalysis, 2001, 29, 83-104.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Gorbatov, S., & Lane, A. (2018). Is HR missing the point on performance feedback? MIT Sloan Management Review, 59(4), 65-71.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Gruman, J. A., & Saks, A. M. (2011). Performance management and employee engagement. Human resource management review, 21), 123-136.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Ikramullah, M., Van Prooijen, J. W., Iqbal, M. Z., & Ul-Hassan, F. S. (2016). Effectiveness of performance appraisal. Personnel Review, 45, 334 – 352.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Iles, R., & Judge, T.A. (2005). Goal regulation across time: The effects of feedback and affect. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90 (No. 3), 453-467.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Jansen, P.G.W., & Eijkelenburg, S. (1998). Onderzoek en accountancy: normatieve gidsen en inductieve speurders. In: A.Bac & K.Wildschut (Red.). Reflecties op Bak. Liber Amicorum aangeboden bij het emeritaat van Prof. drs. G.G.M. Bak RA. Tilburg University Press, 113-124.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Jansen, P.G.W. (2002). Organisatie en mensen. Inleiding in de bedrijfspsychologie voor economen en bedrijfskundigen (3e herziene druk). Baarn: Nelissen.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Jansen, P.G.W., Stoop, L.A.M. (2001). The Dynamics of Assessment Center Validity: Results of a Seven Year Study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86 (No.4, Aug), 741-753.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Jansen, P.G.W., & Vinkenburg, C.J. (2006). Predicting management career success from assessment center data: a longitudinal study. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68, 253-266.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Jansen., P.G.W., & Vloeberghs, D.F.J. (1999). Multi-rater feedback methods: personal and organizational implications. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 14 (No.6), 455-476.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Joo, H., Aguinis, H., & Bradley, K.J. (2017) Not all nonnormal distributions are created equal: Improved theoretical and measurement precision. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102, 1022–1053.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Keith, N., & Frese, M. (2008). Effectiveness of error management training: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 59-69.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Kinicki, A.J., Prussia, G., Wu, B., & McKee-Ryan, F.M. (2004). A covariance structure analysis of employees’ response to performance feedback. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 1037-1069.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Kluger, A.N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance. A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119 (No.2), 254-284.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Levy, P. E., & Williams, J. R. (2004). The social context of performance appraisal: A review and framework for the future. Journal of management, 30(6), 881-905.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Markoulli, M. P., Lee, C. I., Byington, E., & Felps, W. A. (2017). Mapping Human Resource Management: Reviewing the field and charting future directions. Human Resource Management Review, 27), 367-396.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Merkelbach, H. (2020). Verloot die onderzoekssubsidies. NRC, zaterdag 4januari2020, p. W2.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. O’BoyleE.H., & AguinisH. (2012). The best and the rest: Revisiting the norm of normality of individual performance. Personnel Psychology, 65, 79–119.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Pulakos, E. D., & O’Leary, R. S. (2011). Why is performance management broken? Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 4(2), 146-164.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Quinn, R., & Rohrbaugh, J. (1983). A spatial model of effectiveness criteria: towards a competing values approach to organizational analysis. Management Science, 29, 363-377
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Redman, T., Snape, E., Thompson, D., & Yan, F. K. C. (2000). Performance appraisal in an NHS hospital. Human Resource Management Journal, 10(1), 48 - 62.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Roskam, E. E. (1989). Operationalization, a superfluous concept. Quality and Quantity, 23 (3), 237-275.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Searle, J.R. (1998). Mind, language and society. Philosophy in the real world. Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Sewell, G., & Taskin, L. (2015). Out of sight, out of mind in a new world of work? Autonomy, control, and spatiotemporal scaling in telework. Organization Studies, 36(11), 1507-1529.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Schleicher, D. J., Baumann, H. M., Sullivan, D. W., Levy, P. E., Hargrove, D. C., & Barros-Rivera, B. A. (2018). Putting the system into performance management systems: A review and agenda for performance management research. Journal of Management, 44(6), 2209-2245.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Tarski, Alfred. (1944). The semantic conception of truth: and the foundations of semantics. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 4 (no. 3), 341-376.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Vinkenburg, C.J., Jansen, P.G.W., Dries, N., & Pepermans, R. (2014). Arena: a critical conceptual framework of top management selection. Group & Organization Management, 39 (No.1), 33-68.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/THRM2022.1.JANS
Loading
/content/journals/10.5117/THRM2022.1.JANS
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Keyword(s): Beoordelen
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error