- Home
- A-Z Publications
- KWALON
- Previous Issues
- Volume 27, Issue 3, 2022
KWALON - Volume 27, Issue 3, 2022
Volume 27, Issue 3, 2022
-
-
Methoden voor kwalitatief onderzoek op afstand
Authors: Saakshi Joshi & Tess OsborneAbstractMethods for qualitative remote research
The restrictions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic brought together researchers from the Netherlands and India in the research project EQUIMOB to assess effects of the pandemic on social life. This paper describes the opportunities and limitations of methods for conducting remote research, and in additional papers we will discuss two examples of qualitative remote research (telephone interviews and graphic elicitation). Based on first-hand experience, the authors provide an overview of their work in using these methods.
-
-
-
Etnografisch onderzoek in de ‘eigen setting’: Twee opportunistische onderzoeken naar stigmatisering in Nederland
Authors: Abdessamad Bouabid & Ramón RomijnAbstractEthnograpic research in your ‘own setting’. Two opportunistic studies of stigmatization in the Netherlands.
In this article, the authors discuss their own experiences with doing opportunistic ethnography: doing participant observations in a familiar setting in which you are already an ordinary participant. On the one hand, they elaborate on the advantages, such as skipping the time-consuming and uncertain challenge of getting access and gaining trust. On the other, they discuss some risks involved with this ‘at-home’ ethnography, such as not seeing the taken for granted and going native, while presenting some field work solutions to these problems. They conclude that opportunistic ethnography only works in specific social contexts, demands a specific attitude from the researcher and should more often be applied. In this way that unique access to settings is taken advantage of and the ordinary of everyday life is not being ignored.
-
-
-
Ethiek van participatief actieonderzoek
More LessAbstractEthics of participatory action research
Participatory action research, (extreme) citizen science, living labs or other forms of research with patients or citizen participation continues to grow in popularity. While these research approaches embrace inclusiveness, social justice, and co-ownership, they are not necessarily “ethical”. Ethical issues regularly arise in everyday practice, surrounding partnership, collaboration and power. My PhD made me aware that researchers who conduct participatory research should be mindful of the daily ethical considerations and attention to do the “right” thing. Reflection on dilemmas (together with co-researchers) helps raise awareness and provides direction for appropriate actions.
-
Volumes & issues
-
Volume 29 (2024)
-
Volume 28 (2023)
-
Volume 27 (2022)
-
Volume 26 (2021)
-
Volume 25 (2020)
-
Volume 24 (2019)
-
Volume 23 (2018)
-
Volume 22 (2017)
-
Volume 21 (2016)
-
Volume 20 (2015)
-
Volume 19 (2014)
-
Volume 18 (2013)
-
Volume 17 (2012)
-
Volume 16 (2011)
-
Volume 15 (2010)
-
Volume 14 (2009)
-
Volume 13 (2008)
-
Volume 12 (2007)
-
Volume 11 (2006)
-
Volume 10 (2005)
-
Volume 9 (2004)
Most Read This Month
