De rol van traditionele beeldvorming van mensenhandel in de herkenning van huwelijksdwang

References

1. Appel, A., van Doorn, J., & Ras, I. A. (2024). Kenmerken van ideaal slachtofferschap bij mensenhandel: Een media-analyse. Mens & Maatschappij, 99(4), 323-344.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Aujla, W. (2020). Using a Vignette in Qualitative Research to Explore Police Perspectives of a Sensitive Topic: ‘Honor’-Based Crimes and Forced Marriages. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919898352
   [Google Scholar]
3. Austin, R., & Farrell, A. (2017). Human Trafficking and the Media in the United States. Criminology and Criminal Justice. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264079.013.290
   [Google Scholar]
4. Barter, C., & Renold, E. (1999). The use of vignettes in qualitative research. Social Research Update, 25, 1-5.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Best, J. (1990). Threatened children: Rhetoric and concern about child victims. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Boeije, H. (2014). Analyseren in kwalitatief onderzoek: Denken en doen. Amsterdam: Boom Lemma.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bouché, V., Farrell, A., & Wittmer-Wolfe, D. E. (2018). Challenging the dominant frame: the moderating impact of exposure and knowledge on perceptions of sex trafficking victimization. Social Science Quarterly, 99(4), 1283-1302. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12492
   [Google Scholar]
8. Broad, R., & Turnbull, N. (2019). From Human Trafficking to Modern Slavery: The Development of Anti-Trafficking Policy in the UK. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 25(2), 119–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-018-9375-4
   [Google Scholar]
9. Chantler, K., Mirza, N., & Mackenzie, M (2022). Policy and Professional Responses to Forced Marriage in Scotland. The British Journal of Social Work, 52(2), 833-849. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcab068
   [Google Scholar]
10. Charnysh, V., Lloyd, P., & Simmons, B. A. (2015). Frames and consensus formation in international relations: The case of trafficking in persons. European Journal of International Relations, 21(2), 323–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066114530173
    [Google Scholar]
11. Christie, N. (1986). The ideal victim. In E.Fattah (Ed.), From crime policy to victim policy: Reorienting the justice system. Basingstoke, U.K.: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Decorte, T., & Zaitch, D. (2021). Kwalitatieve methoden en technieken in de criminologie. Leuven: Acco.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2011). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (4th ed.). Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Donninger, D., de Vries, I., Ras, I., & van Meeteren, M. (2024). De beeldvorming van mensenhandel in het Nederlandse politieke debat. Tijdschrift voor criminologie, 66(1). https://doi.org/10.5553/TvC/0165182X2024066001003
    [Google Scholar]
15. De Vries, I., Farrell, A., Bouché, D., & Wittmer-Wolfe, D. E. (2020). Crime frames and gender differences in the activation of crime concern and crime responses. Journal of Criminal Justice, 66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2019.101651
    [Google Scholar]
16. Entman, R.M. (1993). Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43, 51-58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
    [Google Scholar]
17. Entman, R. M., Matthes, J., & Pellicano, L. (2008). Nature, Sources, and Effects of News Framing. In K.Wahl-Jorgensen, & T.Hanitzsch (eds.) The Handbook of Journalism Studies. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Farrell, A. (2012). Improving Law Enforcement Identification and Response to Human Trafficking. In J.Winterdyk, B.Perrin & P.Recihel (eds.) Human Trafficking: Exploring the International Nature, Concerns and Complexities. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Farrell, A. (2009). Understanding the Determinants of Police Identification of Human Trafficking Cases. First Annual Interdisciplinary Conference on Human Trafficking 2009. Geraadpleegd van https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/188058078.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
20. Farrell, A., & Fahy, S. (2009). The Problem of Human Trafficking in the U.S.: Public Frames and Policy Responses. Journal of Criminal Justice, 37, 617-626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2009.09.010
    [Google Scholar]
21. Farrell, A., McDevitt, J., & Fahy, S. (2010). Where Are all the Victims? Understanding the Determinants of Official Identification of Human Trafficking Incidents. Criminology and Public Policy, 9, 201-233. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9133.2010.00621.x
    [Google Scholar]
22. Farrell, A., & Pfeffer, R. (2014). Policing human trafficking: Cultural blinders and organizational barriers. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 653(1), 46–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716213515835
    [Google Scholar]
23. Gangoli, G., Razak, A., & McCarry, M. (2006). Forced marriage and domestic violence among South Asian communities in Northeast England. Bristol: School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol and Northern Rock Foundation
    [Google Scholar]
24. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge: Harvard University Press
    [Google Scholar]
25. Gulati, G. J. (2011). News frames and story triggers in the media coverage of human trafficking. Human Rights Review, 12(3), 363-379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-010-0184-5
    [Google Scholar]
26. Heap, V., & Waters, J. (2018). Mixed Methods in Criminology (1e editie). Londen: Routledge. International Labour Organization (2022). Global estimates of Modern Slavery: Forced Labour and Forced Marriage. Geraadpleegd op 19februari2024 van https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_norm/---ipec/documents/publication/wcms_854733.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
27. Janssen, J. (2017). Huwelijksdwang. Wat ziet de politie?Landelijk Expertisecentrum Eergerelateerd Geweld. Geraadpleegd op 19maart2024 van https://hbo-kennisbank.nl/details/sharekit_av:oai:surfsharekit.nl:483ad519-e864-4a8e-8e08-73d7d5d647a0
    [Google Scholar]
28. Julios, C. (2015). Forced Marriage and ‘Honour’ Killings in Britain: Private Lives, Community Crimes and Public Policy Perspectives. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Kakar, M. M., & Yousaf, F. N. (2022). Gender, Political and Economic Instability, and Trafficking intro Forced Marriage. Women & Criminal Justice, 32(3), 277-287. https://doi.org/10.1080/08974454.2021.1926403
    [Google Scholar]
30. Kingdon, J. W. (1984). Bridging research and policy: Agendas, alternative and public policy. New York: Harper Collins
    [Google Scholar]
31. Knaggård, A. (2015). The Multiple Streams Framework and the problem broker. European Journal of Political Research, 54(3), 450-465. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12097
    [Google Scholar]
32. Landelijk Knooppunt Huwelijksdwang en Achterlating (2015). Strafrecht en civiel recht. Landelijk Knooppunt van Huwelijksdwang en Achterlating. Geraadpleegd op 11februari2024 van https://www.huwelijksdwangenachterlating.nl/strafrecht-en-civiel-recht
    [Google Scholar]
33. Landelijk Knooppunt Huwelijksdwang en Achterlating (2022). Huwelijksdwang. Landelijk Knooppunt Huwelijksdwang en Achterlating. Geraadpleegd op 11februari2024 van https://www.huiselijkgeweld.nl/publicaties/factsheets/2018/11/01/huwelijksdwang
    [Google Scholar]
34. Lestrade, S. M. A. (2023). De strafbaarstelling van mensenhandel, uitbuiting en ernstige benadeling nader beschouwd. Boom Strafblad, 3, 109-119. https://doi.org/10.5553/BSb/266669012023004003001
    [Google Scholar]
35. Linneberg, M., S., & Korsgaard, S. (2019). Coding qualitative data: a synthesis guiding the novice. Qualitative Research Journal, 19(3), 259-270. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-12-2018-0012
    [Google Scholar]
36. Love, H., Dank, M., Esthappan, S., & Zweig, J. (2018). Navigating an Unclear Terrain: Challenges in Recognizing, Naming, and Accessing Services for ‘Forced Marriage’. Violence Against Women, 25(9), 1138-1159. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801218808397
    [Google Scholar]
37. Mahon, J. F., & Wartick, S. L. (2003). Dealing with Stakeholders: How Reputation, Credibility and Framing Influence the Game, Corporate Reputation Review, 6 (1), 19-35. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540187
    [Google Scholar]
38. McCabe, H., & Eglen, L. (2022). ‘I bought you. You are my wife’: ‘Modern Slavery’ and Forced Marriage. Journal of Human Trafficking, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322705.2022.2096366
    [Google Scholar]
39. McCombes, M., & Shaw, D. (1972). The Agenda-Setting function of mass media. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176-187). http://www.jstor.org/stable/2747787
    [Google Scholar]
40. Meriläinen, N., & Vos, M. (2013). Framing issues in the public debate: The case of human rights. Corporate Communications An International Journal, 18(1), 119-134. https://doi.org/10.1108/13563281311294164
    [Google Scholar]
41. Meriläinen, N., & Vos, M. (2015). Public Discourse on Human Trafficking in International Issue Arenas, Societies, 5(1), 14-42. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc5010014
    [Google Scholar]
42. Miles-Johnson, T., & Courtenay, T. (2021). Recognition and response: policing ‘Forced marriage’ in England. Policing and Society, 31(10), 1248-1264. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2021.1873325
    [Google Scholar]
43. Ministerie van Buitenlandse Zaken (2022, 22december). Europese Commissie presenteert voorstel voor een herziening van de richtlijn ter bestrijding van mensenhandel. Ministerie van Buitenlandse Zaken. Geraadpleegd op 17januari2024, van https://ecer.minbuza.nl/-/europese-commissie-presenteert-voorstel-voor-een-herziening-van-de-richtlijn-ter-bestrijding-van-mensenhandel#:~:text=De%20Commissie%20heeft%20op%2019,te%20onderzoeken%20en%20te%20vervolgen.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Nationaal Rapporteur Mensenhandel en Seksueel Geweld tegen Kinderen (2016). Zicht op kwetsbaarheid. Nationaal Rapporteur Mensenhandel en Seksueel Geweld tegen Kinderen. Geraadpleegd op 19maart2024 van https://open.overheid.nl/documenten/ronl-archief-1940e6ab-5391-4383-9900-95bc0ed33c51/pdf
    [Google Scholar]
45. Nationaal Rapporteur Mensenhandel en Seksueel Geweld tegen Kinderen (2024). Nieuwe Europese regelgeving mensenhandel aangenomen. Nationaal Rapporteur Mensenhandel en Seksueel Geweld tegen Kinderen. Geraadpleegd op 21juni2024 van https://www.nationaalrapporteur.nl/actueel/nieuws/2024/05/28/nieuwe-europese-regelgeving-mensenhandel-aangenomen
    [Google Scholar]
46. Nelson, T. E., & Kinder, D. R. (1996). Issue frames and group-centrism in American public opinion. The Journal of Politics, 58(4), 1055-1078. https://doi.org/10.2307/2960149
    [Google Scholar]
47. O’Brien, E. (2018). Challenging the human trafficking narrative: Victims, villains, and heroes. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Quek, K. (2018). Marriage trafficking: women in forced wedlock. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Raad van de Europese Unie (2024). Strijd tegen mensenhandel: Raad en Parlement akkoord over strengere regels. Raad van de Europese Unie. Geraadpleegd op 9februari2024 van https://www.consilium.europa.eu/nl/press/press-releases/2024/01/23/fight-against-human-trafficking-council-and-european-parliament-strike-deal-to-strengthen-rules/
    [Google Scholar]
50. Ranaweera, N. (2024). Beyond Numbers: Embracing the Depth of Qualitative Research in Criminology. International Journal of Qualitative Research, 3(3), 315-325. https://doi.org/10.47540/ijqr.v3i3.1346
    [Google Scholar]
51. Richtlijn 2011/36/EU van het Europees Parlement en de Raad van 5 april 2011 inzake de voorkoming en bestrijding van mensenhandel en de bescherming van slachtoffers daarvan, en ter vervanging van Kaderbesluit 2002/629/JBZ van de Raad.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Sanford, R., Martínez, D. E., & Weitzer, R. (2016). Framing human trafficking: A content analysis of recent US newspaper articles. Journal of Human trafficking, 2(2), 139-155. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322705.2015.1107341
    [Google Scholar]
53. SeelingerK. (2010). Forced marriage and asylum: Perceiving the invisible harm. Columbia Human Rights Review, 42(1), 55–117. Geraadpleegd van https://cgrs.uclawsf.edu/sites/default/files/Forced_marriage_and_asylum_Seelinger_2010_0.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
54. Simmons, B. A., Lloyd, P., & Stewart, B. M. (2018). The global diffusion of law: transnational crime and the case of human trafficking. International Organization, 72(2), 249-281. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818318000036
    [Google Scholar]
55. Srikantiah, J. (2007). Perfect victims and real survivors: The iconic victim in domestic human trafficking law. Immigr. & Nat’lity L. Rev., 28, 741.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Sowey, H. (2018). From an emic perspective: exploring consent in forced marriage law. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 51(2), 258-274. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004865817701982
    [Google Scholar]
57. Torres, N. & Villacampa, C. (2021). Intervention with Victims of Forced Marriage. Women & Criminal Justice, 32(3), 288-305. https://doi.org/10.1080/08974454.2021.1875107
    [Google Scholar]
58. United Nations (z.d.). Child and forced marriage, including in humanitarian settings. United Nations. Geraadpleegd op 9februari van https://www.ohchr.org/en/women/child-and-forced-Unimarriage-including-humanitarian-settings
    [Google Scholar]
59. Universele Verklaring van de Rechten van de Mens (1948, 10december). Geraadpleegd op 9februari2024 van https://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBV0001008/1948-12-10/0/informatie
60. United Nations (z.d.). Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons Especially Women and Children, supplementing the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime. United Nations. Geraadpleegd op 22maart van https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/protocol-prevent-suppress-and-punish-trafficking-persons
    [Google Scholar]
61. Van Staa, A., & de Vries, K. (2014). Directed content analysis: een meer deductieve dan inductieve aanpak bij kwalitatieve analyse. KWALON, 19(3), 46-54. https://doi.org/10.5117/2014.019.003.046
    [Google Scholar]
62. Villacampa, C., & Torres, N. (2019). Prevalence, dynamics and characteristics of forced marriage in Spain. Crime, Law and Social Change, 73, 509-529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-019-09881-2
    [Google Scholar]
63. Voorstel 2022/0426 voor een richtlijn van het Europees Parlement en de Raad tot wijziging van Richtlijn 2011/36/EU inzake de voorkoming en bestrijding van mensenhandel en de bescherming van slachtoffers daarvan. Wet tegengaan huwelijksdwang (2015, 5december). Geraadpleegd van https://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0037085/2015-12-05
    [Google Scholar]
64. Wilson, M., & O’Brien, E. (2016). Constructing the ideal victim in the United States of America’s annual trafficking in persons reports. Change Crime, Law and Social Change, 65(1–2), 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-015-9600-8
    [Google Scholar]
65. WODC (2019). Verboden huwelijken: Onderzoek naar de werking van de Wet tegengaan huwelijksdwang in de praktijk. Geraadpleegd op 19februari2024 van https://www.eerstekamer.nl/overig/20191209/onderzoek_naar_de_werking_van_de/document
    [Google Scholar]