2004
  1. Home
  2. Publications
  3. Mens & Maatschappij
  4. Volume 101, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 101, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0025-9454
  • E-ISSN: 1876-2816

Abstract

Abstract

This study explores and explains the experienced disbelief responses faced by victims of intimate partner violence (IPV). Findings were based on a longitudinal study involving 29 victims, and reveal three central mechanisms: (1) a lack of knowledge regarding psychological abuse (such as coercive control) and the cyclical nature of the violence, (2) the role of stereotypes about (victims of) IPV, and (3) the dynamics between victim and perpetrator as perceived by observers. Victims who deviate from the stereotypical image of a victim or express emotions deemed ‘inappropriate’ experience that they are more likely to be met with skepticism. Fragmented care further obstructs recognition of the full pattern of abuse. Conversely, when professionals possess IPV-specific expertise, victims reported feeling heard and acknowledged. These findings highlight the need for knowledge dissemination, stereotype awareness, and credibility as a starting point for interactions with victims.

© Janne van Doorn et al.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/MEM2026.1.004.DOOR
2026-03-01
2026-03-09
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Amnesty International Nederland (2025). Psychisch geweld: Elf vrouwen doorbreken de stilte. Geraadpleegd via: https://www.amnesty.nl/content/uploads/2025/03/AMN_25_05_boekje-psychisch-geweld_digitaal.pdf?x17069
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Bouma, S. (2021). Economisch zelfstandig en (niet) beschermd tegen partnergeweld: Hoe het complexe verband tussen economische zelfstandigheid en partnergeweld de noodzaak van gendersensitief beleid onderstreept. Tijdschrift voor Genderstudies, 24(2), 109-126.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Campbell, B. A., MenakerT. A., King, W. R. (2015). The determination of victim credibility by adult and juvenile sexual assault investigators. Journal of Criminal Justice, 43, 29-39.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Campbell, R., Ahrens, C. E., Sefl, T., Wasco, S. M., & Barnes, H. E. (2001). Social reactions to rape victims: Healing and hurtful effects on psychological and physical health outcomes. Violence and Victims, 16(3), 287-302.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Christie, N. (1986). The ideal victim. In: E.Fattah (Ed.), From crime policy to victim (p. 17-31). Hampshire: Macmillan.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Darke, L., Paterson, H., & van Golde, C. (2025). Illuminating gaslighting: A comprehensive interdisciplinary review of gaslighting literature. Journal of Family Violence. Online first: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-025-00805-4
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Daru, S., Mejdoubi, J., De Vaan, K., & Visser, A. (2016). Voorbij vooroordelen en stereotypes: Gender en partnergeweld in de praktijk. Regioplan, Movisie, & Atria.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. De Ruiter, C., & Van Pol, B. (2017). Mythen over conflictscheidingen: Een onderzoek naar de kennis van juridische en sociale professionals. Family and Law (Mei), 1-22.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Ferguson, C. E., & Malouff, J. M. (2016). Assessing police classifications of sexual assault reports: A meta-analysis of false reporting rates. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45, 1185–1193.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Friese, S. (2019). Qualitative data analysis with ATLAS.ti. SAGE Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. VNG. (2022). Factsheet Intieme terreur. Geraadpleegd via: https://vng.nl/publicaties/factsheet-intieme-terreur
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Hegarty, K. L., & Taft, A. J. (2001). Overcoming the barriers to disclosure and inquiry of partner abuse for women attending general practice. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 25(5), 433-437.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Hendriks, A., & Mansvelt, M. (2025). Trauma-geïnformeerd werken in huiselijkgeweldzaken: het begint met de erkenning van het geweld. Justitiële Verkenningen, 51(1), 61-76.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Hendrik, A., & Vledder, I. (2025). Met liefde heeft het niets te maken. Amsterdam: Uitgeverij Cargo.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Lo Fo Wong, S. H., & Lagro-Janssen, A. L. (2005). Mishandeling van vrouwen binnen de partnerrelatie: signalering in de medische praktijk. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde, 149, 6–9.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Lo Fo Wong, S., Wester, F., Mol, S., Römkens, R., Hezemans, D., & Lagro-Janssen, T. (2008). Talking matters: Abused women’s views on disclosure of partner abuse to the family doctor and its role in handling the abuse situation. Patient Education and Counseling, 70(3), 386-394.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Lohmann, S., Cowlishaw, S., Ney, L., O’Donnell, M., & Felmingham, K. (2024). The trauma and mental health impacts of coercive control: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Trauma, Violence, and Abuse, 25(1), 630-647.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Lünnemann, K., Lünnemann, M., & Steketee, M. (2024). Patroon van dwang en controle is genderspecifiek. Verdiepende analyses derde cohortstudie wat betreft patroon van controle en dwang onder cliënten Veilig Thuis. Utrecht: Verwey-Jonker Instituut.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Mellaard, A., Aarten, P. G. M., van Doorn, J., Evertz, K., Klein, M., van Vliet, J., & Wagemakers, F. (2024). Dubbel slachtoffer? Een multidisciplinaire discussie over het voorkomen van paradoxale situaties voor slachtoffers van partnergeweld. PROCES, 2, 78-91.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Monterrosa, A. E. (2021). How race and gender stereotypes influence help-seeking for intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(17-18), NP9153-NP9174.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Morrison, K. E., Luchok, K. J., Richter, D. L., & Parra-Medina, D. (2006). Factors influencing help-seeking from informal networks among African American victims of intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 21(11), 1493-1511.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Robinson, R. (2010). Myths and stereotypes: How registered nurses screen for intimate partner violence. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 36(6), 572-576.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Slachtofferwijzer. (2024). Wat is gaslighting? Betekenis, symptomen en voorbeelden. www.slachtofferwijzer.nl
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Stark, E. (2007). Coercive control: How men entrap women in personal life. Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Stark, E., & Hester, M. (2019). Coercive control: Update and review. Violence Against Women, 25(1), 81-104.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. SylaskaK. M., & EdwardsK. M. (2014). Disclosure of intimate partner violence to informal social support network members: A review of the literature. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 15(1), 3-21.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Tsang, J. A., & Stanford, M. S. (2007). Forgiveness for intimate partner violence: The influence of victim and offender variables. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(4), 653-664.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Ullman, S. E. (2023). Correlates of social reactions to victims’ disclosures of sexual assault and intimate partner violence: A systematic review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 24(1), 29-43.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Van der Velden, P. G., Oudejans, M., Das, M., Bosmans, M., & Maercker, A. (2019). The longitudinal effect of social recognition on PTSD symptomatology and vice versa: Evidence from a population-based study. Psychiatry Research, 278, 354–360.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Van Doorn, J., Klapwijk, J.A., & Aarten, P. (2025). Juridische en psychosociale hulpverlening aan slachtoffers van partnergeweld. Een overzicht van het landschap op basis van slachtofferervaringen. Tijdschrift voor Veiligheid, 24(1), 3-21
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Van DoornJ., & KunstM. J. J. (2023). Geloofwaardigheidsbeoordelingen in juridische procedures. In: Doorn J.van, BrandsJ., KunstM.J.J., MullerE.R., PembertonA. & ReemstL. van (red.), Slachtoffers: Onderzoek, beleid en praktijk (p. 745-759). Deventer: Wolters Kluwer.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Van Doorn, J., & Schot, J. (2025). De rol van traumagerelateerde emoties in juridische beslissingen. Justitiële Verkenningen, 51(1), 77-95.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Woicik, K., Eisenberg, M., Burgers, V. W. G., Tressova-van Veldhoven, D., Sijtsema, J. J., Bogaerts, S., & van Zijp-Lens, K. (2019). Plegers van partnergeweld en kindermishandeling. Tilburg University / Den Haag: WODC.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. World Health Organization. (2012). Understanding and addressing violence against women: Intimate partner violence. Geneve: WHO.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.5117/MEM2026.1.004.DOOR
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): coercive control; Intimate partner violence (IPV); stereotypes; victim credibility

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error