Een steeds rijker geschakeerd palet aan kennisbronnen voor de empirische sociologie | Amsterdam University Press Journals Online
2004
Volume 97, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 0025-9454
  • E-ISSN: 1876-2816

Abstract

Abstract

Over the course of the twentieth century, articles in Mens & Maatschappij showed a shift from primarily conceptual treatises, towards more theoretical-contemplative pieces, followed by a strong focus on empirical-theoretical papers. Surveys have become the dominant data collection method, but their form has changed over the years, and there is a trend towards enriching survey data with big data. Looking towards the future, researchers see expanding opportunities to carry out mass online experiments, or to construct samples in which respondents are known to be related to one another to a specified degree. With the increasingly rich palette of knowledge sources at their disposal, sociologists are better able to answer new kinds of questions, such as those about processes that take generations to develop, about how beliefs spread, or about how deeply divided our society is.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/MEM2022.3.003.DYKS
2022-10-01
2024-04-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Arts, W. (2000). Trends en lotgevallen. Mens & Maatschappij in de afgelopen vijfentwintig jaar. Mens & Maatschappij, 75, 151-162.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bail, C. (2021). Breaking the social media prism: How to make our platforms less polarizing. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Calderwood, L., & Lessof, L. (2009). Enhancing longitudinal surveys by linking to administrative data. In P.Lynn (Ed.), Methodology of longitudinal surveys (pp. 55-72). London: John Wiley & Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Callegaro, M., & Yang, Y. (2018). The role of surveys in the era of “big data”. In D. L.Vannette & J. A.Krosnick (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of survey research (pp. 175-192). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Das, M., & Emery, T. (te verschijnen). Digital technologies and the future of social surveys. Research handbook for digital sociology.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Das, M., Kapteyn, A., & Bosnjak, M. (2018). Open probability-based panel infrastructures. In D. L.Vannette & J. A.Krosnick (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of survey research (pp. 199-209). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Grossmann, M (2021). How social science got better: Overcoming bias with more evidence, diversity, and self-reflection. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Groves, R. M. (2011). Three eras of survey research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 75, 861-871.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Lazer, D., Hargittai, E., Freelon, D., Gonzalez-Bailon, S., Munger, K., Ognyanova, K., & Radford, J. (2021). Meaningful measures of human society in the twenty-first century. Nature, 595, 189-196.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Nederlands Platform voor Survey Onderzoek (2022). Waarom een platform voor survey onderzoek?https://www.npso.net/Over-het-NPSO/Algemeen (laatst bezocht op 1mei2022).
  11. Salganik, M. J. (2018). Bit by bit: Social research in the digital age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Savage, M., & Burrows, R. (2007). The coming crisis of empirical sociology. Sociology, 41, 885-899.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Steinmetz, S. R. (1925). Nieuwste Duitsche sociologie. Mensch en Maatschappij, 1, 3-11.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Swanborn, P. G. (1975). Mens en Maatschappij 50 jaar: Enkele opmerkingen over verschuivingen in de inhoud van het tijdschrift. Mens en Maatschappij, 50, 271-277.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Triantoro, T., Gopal, R., Benbunan-Fich, R., & Lang, G. (2020). Personality and games: Enhancing online surveys through gamification. Information Technology and Management, 21, 169-178.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/MEM2022.3.003.DYKS
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error