Volume 95, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 0025-9454
  • E-ISSN: 1876-2816
Preview this article:

There is no abstract available.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Andeweg, R.B.(2014). Studying political legitimacy; A critical reappraisal. Amsterdam: KNAW Conference on New Directions in Legitimacy Research.
  2. Beetham, D., & C.Lord(1998). Legitimacy and the European Union, in: M.Nentwhich (red.), Political Theory and the European Union. Legitimacy, constitutional choice and citizenship (15-33), London/ New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Carabain, C.L., & Y.de Kluizenaar(2019). Samen zijn we sterk. De burger en het klimaat- en energiebeleid: een reflectie. Den Haag: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau.
  4. Dahl, R.(1957). The concept of power. In: Behavioral Science, 2(3), 201-215.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. De Groot, J.I.M., & Steg, L.(2008). Value Orientations to Explain Beliefs Related to Environmental Significant Behavior. Environment and Behavior, 40(3), 330-354. doi:10.1177/0013916506297831.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Decreus, T.(2011). Legitimiteit, gemeenschap en rechtvaardigheid Een kritiek op Dworkins verklaring voor legitimiteit. Rechtsfilosofie & Rechtstheorie, 40(1), 31-46.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Diekmann, A., & P.Preisendörfer(2003). Green and greenback: The behavioral effects of environmental attitudes in low-cost and high-cost situations. Rationality and Society, 15(4), 441-472.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Easton, D.(1957). An approach to the analysis of political systems. World Politics, 9(3), 383-400.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Easton, D.(1965). A systems analysis of political life. New York: Wiley.
  10. Gilley, B.(2006). The meaning and measure of state legitimacy: Results of 72 countries. European Journal of Political Research, 45, 499-525.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Habermas, J.(1996): Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  12. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A.(1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-291.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Klimaatberaad
    Klimaatberaad(2019). Klimaatakkoord. Geraadpleegd van www.klimaatakkoord.nl.
  14. Klimaatwet
    Klimaatwet(2020). Klimaatwet. Geraadpleegd van https://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0042394/2020-01-01.
  15. Lind, E., & T.Tyler(1988). The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. New York/ Londen: Plenum Press.
  16. Lipset
    Lipset(1960). Political man: The social bases of politics. Garden City: Doubleday.
  17. Locke, J. (1980/1690). Second Treatise on Civil Government. Bewerkt door C.B.MacPherson. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.
  18. Mutz, D.C.(2007). Political Psychology and Choice. In: R.J.Dalton en H.-D.Klingemann (reds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior (p. 80-99). New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Netelenbos, B.(2016). Political legitimacy beyond Weber. An analytical framework. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  20. Rawls, J.(1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.
  21. Rousseau, J.J.(1762). Du contrat social, ou, principes du droit politique. Amsterdam: Marc Michiel Rey.
  22. Samuelson, W., & Zeckhauser, R.J.(1988). Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1(1), 7-59.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Scharpf, F.W.(1999): Governing in Europe. Effective and Democratic?Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  24. Scharpf, F.W.(2006). Problem Solving Effectiveness and Democratic Accountability in the EU (Political Science Series, 107). Vienna: Institute for Advanced studies.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Scholte, S., Y.de Kluizenaar, T.de Wilde, A.Steenbekkers, & C.Carabain(2020). Op weg naar aardgasvrij wonen – De energietransitie vanuit burgerperspectief. Den Haag: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau.
  26. Thomassen, J., R.Andeweg, & C.van Ham(2017). Political Trust and the decline of legitimacy debate: a theoretical and empirical investigation into their relationship. In: S.Zmerli en T.W.G.van der Meer (red.), Handbook on Political Trust (p. 509-525). Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Taber, C.S., D.Cann, & S.Kucsova(2009). The Motivated Processing of Political Arguments. In: Political Behavior, 31(2), 137-55.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Taber, C.S., M.Lodge, & J.Glathar(2001). The Motivated Construction of Political Judgments. In: J.H.Kuklinski (red.), Citizens and Politics (198-226). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Tyler, T.R. (2003).Procedural Justice, Legitimacy, and the Effective Rule of Law. In: Crime and Justice.
  30. Weber, M.(1978). Economy and society: An Outline of Interpretative Sociology. Edited and translated by G.Roth & C.Wittich.Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error