2004
Volume 95, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 0025-9454
  • E-ISSN: 1876-2816

Abstract

Abstract

To reach global climate targets, it is key that individuals support and undertake climate action. What motivates such actions? We discuss how climate actions are rooted in – and motivated by – values, which reflect stable and general life goals that guide individuals’ behaviours. We focus on the often-studied personal values, as well as on the relatively new perceived group values, and discuss how these can motivate, and be used to promote, climate action. We highlight the importance of biospheric values (i.e., caring about the environment), and the key role perceived group values play in promoting climate action, particularly among less personally motivated individuals.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/MEM2020.3.002.GERD
2020-08-01
2021-06-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Boer, D., & Fischer, R.(2013). How and when do personal values guide our attitudes and sociality? Explaining cross-cultural variability in attitude-value linkages. Psychological Bulletin, 139(5), 1113-1147. doi:10.1037/a0031347
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bolderdijk, J. W., & Steg, L.(2015). Promoting sustainable consumption: The risks of using financial incentives. In J.Thøgersen & L.Reisch (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Sustainable Consumption (pp. 328-342). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bolderdijk, J. W., Knockaert, J., Steg, L., & Verhoef, E. T.(2011). Effects of Pay-As-You-Drive vehicle insurance on young drivers’ speed choice: Results of a Dutch field experiment. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 43(3), 1181-1186. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2010.12.032
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bolderdijk, J. W., Steg, L., Geller, E. S., Lehman, P. K., & Postmes, T.(2013). Comparing the effectiveness of monetary versus moral motives in environmental campaigning. Nature Climate Change, 3(4), 413-416. doi:10.1038/nclimate1767
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bouman, T., & Steg, L.(2017). The value of what others value: How personal and group values relate to pro-environmental attitudes and behaviours. International Conference on Environmental Psychology, 134-135. A Coruna, Spain.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bouman, T., & Steg, L.(2019). Motivating Society-wide Pro-environmental Change. One Earth, 1(1). doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2019.08.002
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bouman, T., & Steg, L. (In press). Engaging city residents in climate action: Addressing the personal and group value-base behind residents’ climate actions. Urbanisation.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bouman, T., Steg, L. & Zawadzki, S.J. (2020). The value of what others value: When perceived biospheric group values influence individuals’ pro-environmental engagement. Journal of Environmental Psychology, in press.
  9. Bouman, T., Steg, L., & Kiers, H. A. L. L.(2018). Measuring Values in Environmental Research: A Test of an Environmental Portrait Value Questionnaire. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(1664-1078), 564. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00564
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Bouman, T., Verschoor, M., Albers, C., Böhm, G., Fisher, S. D., Poortinga, W., ... Steg, L.(2020). When worry about climate change leads to climate action: How values, worry and personal responsibility relate to various climate actions. Global Environmental Change, 62, [102061]. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102061
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Crompton, T.(2010). Common Cause: The Case for Working with our Cultural Values. Retrieved from assets.wwf.org.uk/downloads/common_cause_report.pdf
  12. De Groot, J. I. M., & Steg, L.(2007). Value Orientations and Environmental Beliefs in Five Countries: Validity of an Instrument to Measure Egoistic, Altruistic and Biospheric Value Orientations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38(3), 318-332. doi:10.1177/0022022107300278
    [Google Scholar]
  13. De Groot, J. I. M., & Steg, L.(2008). Value Orientations to Explain Beliefs Related to Environmental Significant Behavior. Environment and Behavior, 40(3), 330-354. doi:10.1177/0013916506297831
    [Google Scholar]
  14. De Groot, J. I., & Steg, L.(2010). Relationships between value orientations, self-determined motivational types and pro-environmental behavioural intentions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 368-378.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M., & Koestner, R.(1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 627-668. doi:10.1037/0033‑2909.125.6.627
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Dietz, T.(2013). Bringing values and deliberation to science communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110 Suppl(Supplement 3), 14081-14087. doi:10.1073/pnas.1212740110
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Dietz, T., Fitzgerald, A., & Shwom, R.(2005). Environmental Values. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30(1), 335-372. doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144444
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Dietz, T., Stern, P. C., & Weber, E. U.(2013). Reducing Carbon-Based Energy Consumption through Changes in Household Behavior. Daedalus, 142(1), 78-89. doi:10.1162/DAED_a_00186
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Dobewall, H., & Aavik, T.(2016). Rank-Order Consistency and Profile Stability of Self- and InformantReports of Personal Values in Comparison to Personality Traits. Journal of Individual Differences, 37(1), 40-48. doi:10.1027/1614‑0001/a000186
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Durkheim, E.(1897). Suicide. Glencoe, Il.: Free Press.
  21. Evans, L., Maio, G. R., Corner, A., Hodgetts, C. J., Ahmed, S., & Hahn, U.(2013). Self-interest and proenvironmental behaviour. Nature Climate Change, 3(2), 122-125. doi:10.1038/nclimate1662
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Feather, N. T.(1995). Values, valences, and choice: The influences of values on the perceived attractiveness and choice of alternatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(6), 1135-1151. doi:10.1037/0022‑3514.68.6.1135
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Fetvadjiev, V. H., & He, J.(2019). The longitudinal links of personality traits, values, and well-being and self-esteem: A five-wave study of a nationally representative sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117(2), 448-464. doi:10.1037/pspp0000212
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Fielding, K. S., & Hornsey, M. J.(2016). A social identity analysis of climate change and environmental attitudes and behaviors: Insights and opportunities. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 7. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00121
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Frey, B. S., & Jegen, R.(2001). Motivation Crowding Theory. Journal of Economic Surveys, 15(5), 589-611. doi:10.1111/1467‑6419.00150
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Fujii, S., & Kitamura, R.(2003). What does a one-month free bus ticket do to habitual drivers? An experimental analysis of habit and attitude change. Transportation, 30(1), 81-95. doi:10.1023/A:1021234607980
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Gillard, R., Gouldson, A., Paavola, J., & Van Alstine, J.(2016). Transformational responses
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Gneezy, U., & Rustichini, A.(2000). Pay enough or don’t pay at all. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(3), 791-810. doi:10.1162/003355300554917
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Hahnel, U. J. J., Arnold, O., Waschto, M., Korcaj, L., Hillmann, K., Roser, D., & Spada, H.(2015). The power of putting a label on it: Green labels weigh heavier than contradicting product information for consumers’ purchase decisions and post-purchase behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(September), 1-17. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01392
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Handgraaf, M. J. J., Van Lidth de Jeude, M. A., & Appelt, K. C.(2013). Public praise vs. private pay: Effects of rewards on energy conservation in the workplace. Ecological Economics, 86, 86-92. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.11.008
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Hanel, P. H. P., Wolfradt, U., Lins de Holanda Coelho, G., Wolf, L. J., Vilar, R., Monteiro, R. P., … Maio, G. R.(2018). The Perception of Family, City, and Country Values Is Often Biased. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 49(5), 831-850. doi:10.1177/0022022118767574
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Haslam, S. A., Oakes, P. J., Reynolds, K. J., & Turner, J. C. (1999, July 1). Social Identity Salience and the Emergence of Stereotype Consensus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 25, pp. 809-818. doi:10.1177/0146167299025007004
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Hornsey, M. J.(2008). Social identity theory and self-categorization theory: A historical review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 204-222. doi:10.1111/j.1751‑9004.2007.00066.x
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Hornsey, M. J., Harris, E. A., Bain, P. G., & Fielding, K. S.(2016). Meta-analyses of the determinants and outcomes of belief in climate change. Nature Climate Change, 6(6), 622-626. doi:10.1038/nclimate2943
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
    Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2018). Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, (V.Masson-Delmotte, P.Zhai, H.-O.Pörtner, D.Roberts, J.Skea, P. R.Shukla, … T.Waterfield, Eds.). Retrieved from https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Ives, C. D., & Fischer, J.(2017). The self-sabotage of conservation: reply to Manfredo et al. Conservation Biology, 31(6), 1483-1485. doi:10.1111/cobi.13025
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Jans, L., Bouman, T., & Fielding, K. S.(2018). A Part of the Energy “In Crowd”: Changing People’s Energy Behavior via Group-Based Approaches. IEEE Power and Energy Magazine, 16(1), 35-41. doi:10.1109/MPE.2017.2759883
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Keizer, K., Lindenberg, S., & Steg, L.(2008). The Spreading of Disorder. Science, 322(5908), 1681-1685. doi:10.1126/science.1161405
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Keizer, K., Lindenberg, S., & Steg, L.(2013). The Importance of Demonstratively Restoring Order. PLoS ONE, 8(6), e65137. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0065137
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Knafo, A., Roccas, S., & Sagiv, L.(2011). The Value of Values in Cross-Cultural Research: A Special Issue in Honor of Shalom Schwartz. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42(2), 178-185. doi:10.1177/0022022110396863
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Langley, M. G.(2020). The influence of perceived group values on willingness to behave pro-environmentally, Bachelor thesis, University of Groningen
  42. Maio, G. R.(2010). Mental representations of social values. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 42(10), 1-43. doi:10.1016/S0065‑2601(10)42001‑8
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Maio, G. R., & Olson, J. M.(1995). Relations between Values, Attitudes, and Behavioral Intentions: The Moderating Role of Attitude Function. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 31, pp. 266-285. doi:10.1006/jesp.1995.1013
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Maio, G. R., Pakizeh, A., Cheung, W.-Y., & Rees, K. J.(2009). Changing, priming, and acting on values: Effects via motivational relations in a circular model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(4), 699-715. doi:10.1037/a0016420
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Maki, A., Burns, R. J., Ha, L., & Rothman, A. J.(2016). Paying people to protect the environment: A meta-analysis of financial incentive interventions to promote proenvironmental behaviors. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 47, 242-255. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.07.006
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Manfredo, M. J., Bruskotter, J. T., Teel, T. L., Fulton, D., Schwartz, S. H., Arlinghaus, R., … Sullivan, L.(2017). Why social values cannot be changed for the sake of conservation. Conservation Biology, 31(4), 772-780. doi:10.1111/cobi.12855
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Milfont, T. L., Milojev, P., & Sibley, C. G.(2016). Values Stability and Change in Adulthood. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(5), 572-588. doi:10.1177/0146167216639245
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Nash, N., Whitmarsh, L., Capstick, S., Hargreaves, T., Poortinga, W., Thomas, G., … Xenias, D.(2017). Climate-relevant behavioral spillover and the potential contribution of social practice theory. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 8(6). doi:10.1002/wcc.481
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Noppers, E. H., Keizer, K., Bockarjova, M., & Steg, L.(2015). The adoption of sustainable innovations: The role of instrumental, environmental, and symbolic attributes for earlier and later adopters. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 44. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.09.002
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Penn, D. J.(2003). The Evolutionary Roots of Our Environmental Problems: Toward a Darwinian Ecology. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 78(3), 275-301. doi:10.1086/377051
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Perlaviciute, G., & Steg, L.(2014). Contextual and psychological factors shaping evaluations and acceptability of energy alternatives: Integrated review and research agenda. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 35(July 2015), 361-381. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.04.003
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Perlaviciute, G., & Steg, L.(2015). The influence of values on evaluations of energy alternatives. Renewable Energy, 77(MAY), 259-267. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2014.12.020
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Peters, A. M., van der Werff, E., & Steg, L.(2018). Beyond purchasing: Electric vehicle adoption motivation and consistent sustainable energy behaviour in The Netherlands. Energy Research and Social Science, 39(October 2017), 234-247. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.008
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Ponizovskiy, V., Grigoryan, L., Kühnen, U., & Boehnke, K.(2019). Social Construction of the ValueBehavior Relation. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 934. doi:10.3389/FPSYG.2019.00934
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Postmes, T., Haslam, S. A., & Jans, L.(2013). A single-item measure of social identification: Reliability, validity, and utility. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52(4), 597-617. doi:10.1111/bjso.12006
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Rokeach, M.(1973). The Nature of Human Values. New York, NY: Free Press.
  57. Ruepert, A. M., Keizer, K., & Steg, L.(2017). The relationship between Corporate Environmental Responsibility, employees’ biospheric values and pro-environmental behaviour at work. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 54, 65-78. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.10.006
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Sagiv, L., Schwartz, S. H., & Arieli, S.(2011). Personal Values, National Culture, and Organizations: Insights Applying the Schwartz Value Framework. The Handbook of Organizational Culture and Climate, (October), 515-537.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Schuitema, G., & de Groot, J. I. M.(2015). Green consumerism: The influence of product attributes and values on purchasing intentions. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 14(1), 57-69. doi:10.1002/cb.1501
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Schultz, W., & Zelezny, L.(1999). Values as predictors of environmental attitudes: Evidence for consistency across 14 countries. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19(3), 255-265. doi:10.1006/jevp.1999.0129
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Schwartz, D., De Bruin, W. B., Fischhoff, B., & Lave, L.(2015). Advertising energy saving programs: The potential environmental cost of emphasizing monetary savings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 21(2), 158-166. doi:10.1037/xap0000042
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Schwartz, S. H.(1992). Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25(C), 1-65. doi:10.1016/S0065‑2601(08)60281‑6
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Schwartz, S. H.(1996). Value priorities and behaviour: Applying a theory of integrated value systems. In & M. P. Z. C.Seligman, J. M.Olson (Ed.), The psychology of values: The Ontario Symposium(Vol. 8, pp. 1-24). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Schwartz, S. H.(1999). A Theory of Cultural Values and Some Implications for Work. Applied Psychology, 48(1), 23-47. doi:10.1111/j.1464‑0597.1999.tb00047.x
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Schwartz, S. H.(2003). A Proposal for Measuring Value Orientations across Nations. In Core ESS Questionnaire (pp. 259-319). Retrieved from https://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/docs/methodology/core_ess_questionnaire/ESS_core_questionnaire_human_values.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Schwartz, S. H.(2012). An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 1-20. doi:10.9707/2307‑0919.1116
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Schwartz, S. H., & Bardi, A.(2001). Value Hierarchies Across Cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32(3), 268-290. doi:10.1177/0022022101032003002
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Schwartz, S. H., & Bilsky, W.(1987). Toward a universal psychological structure of human values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(3), 550-562. doi:10.1037/0022‑3514.53.3.550
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Schwartz, S. H., Cieciuch, J., Vecchione, M., Davidov, E., Fischer, R., Beierlein, C., … Konty, M.(2012). Refining the theory of basic individual values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(4), 663-688. doi:10.1037/a0029393
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Schwartz, S. H., Lehmann, A., & Roccas, S.(1992). Multimethod Probes of Basic Human Values. In Social Psychology and Cultural Context (pp. 107-124). doi:10.4135/9781452220550.n8
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Steg, L.(2016). Values, Norms, and Intrinsic Motivation to Act Proenvironmentally. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 41(1), 277-292. doi:10.1146/annurev‑environ‑110615‑085947
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Steg, L.(2018). Limiting climate change requires research on climate action. Nature Climate Change, 8(9), 759-761. doi:10.1038/s41558‑018‑0269‑8
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Steg, L., Bolderdijk, J. W., Keizer, K., Perlaviciute, G., & Bolderdijk. (2014). An Integrated Framework for Encouraging Pro-environmental Behaviour: The role of values, situational factors and goals. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38(January), 104-115. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.01.002
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Steg, L., & De Groot, J. I. M.(2012). Environmental Values. In S. D.Clayton (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Environmental and Conservation Psychology. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199733026.013.0005
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Steg, L., Perlaviciute, G., & Van Der Werff, E.(2015). Understanding the human dimensions of a sustainable energy transition. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00805
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Steg, L., Perlaviciute, G., van der Werff, E., & Lurvink, J.(2014). The Significance of Hedonic Values for Environmentally Relevant Attitudes, Preferences, and Actions. Environment and Behavior, 46(2), 163-192. doi:10.1177/0013916512454730
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Steinhorst, J., Klöckner, C. A., & Matthies, E.(2015). Saving electricity – For the money or the environment? Risks of limiting pro-environmental spillover when using monetary framing. Journal of Environmental Psychology, Vol. 43, pp. 125-135. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.05.012
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Stern, P. C., & Dietz, T.(1994). The Values of Basis of Environmental Concern. Journal of Social Issues, 50(3), 65-84. doi:10.1111/j.1540‑4560.1994.tb02420.x
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., & Guagnano, G. A.(1998). A brief inventory of values. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58(6), 984-1001. doi:10.1177/0013164498058006008
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Tajfel, H., Billing, M. G. G., Bundy, R. P. P., & Flament, C.(1971). Social Categorization and Intergroup Behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420010202
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C.(1979). An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict. In W. G.Austin & S.Worchel (Eds.), The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey: Brooks/Cole.
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Taufik, D., Bolderdijk, J. W., & Steg, L.(2014). Acting green elicits a literal warm glow. Nature Climate Change, 5(1), 37-40. doi:10.1038/nclimate2449
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Taufik, D., Bolderdijk, J. W., & Steg, L.(2016). Going green? The relative importance of feelings over calculation in driving environmental intent in the Netherlands and the United States. Energy Research & Social Science, 22, 52-62. doi: 10.1016/J.ERSS.2016.08.012to climate change: beyond a systems perspective of social change in mitigation and adaptation. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change,7(2), 251-265.
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M., Oakes, P., & Reicher, S.(1987). Rediscovering the Social Group: A SelfCategorization Theory. Basil Blackwell.
  85. Unsworth, K. L., & Fielding, K. S.(2014). It’s political: How the salience of one’s political identity changes climate change beliefs and policy support. Global Environmental Change, 27, 131-137. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.05.002
    [Google Scholar]
  86. Van den Broek, K., Bolderdijk, J. W., & Steg, L.(2017). Individual differences in values determine the relative persuasiveness of biospheric, economic and combined appeals. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 53, 145-156. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.07.009
    [Google Scholar]
  87. Van der Linden, S.(2015). Intrinsic motivation and pro-environmental behaviour. Nature Climate Change, 5(7), 612-613. doi:10.1038/nclimate2669
    [Google Scholar]
  88. Van der Linden, S. L., Maibach, E., & Leiserowitz, A. A.(2015). Improving Public Engagement With Climate Change. Perspectives on Psychological Science. doi:10.1177/1745691615598516
    [Google Scholar]
  89. Van Der Werff, E., & Steg, L.(2015). One model to predict them all: Predicting energy behaviours with the norm activation model. Energy Research & Social Science, 6, 8-14. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2014.11.002
    [Google Scholar]
  90. Van Der Werff, E., Steg, L., & Keizer, K.(2014). Follow the signal: When past pro-environmental actions signal who you are. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40(July 2015), 273-282. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.07.004
    [Google Scholar]
  91. Venhoeven, L. A., Bolderdijk, J. W., & Steg, L.(2013). Explaining the Paradox: How Pro-Environmental Behaviour can both Thwart and Foster Well-Being. Sustainability, 5(4), 1372-1386. doi:10.3390/su5041372
    [Google Scholar]
  92. Venhoeven, L. A., Bolderdijk, J. W., & Steg, L.(2016). Why Acting Environmentally-Friendly Feels Good: Exploring the Role of Self-Image. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1846. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01846
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/MEM2020.3.002.GERD
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): biospheric values; climate action; climate change; group values; values

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error