De economische dreiging van klimaatverandering | Amsterdam University Press Journals Online
2004
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Mens & Maatschappij
  4. Volume 96, Issue 4
  5. Article
Volume 96, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 0025-9454
  • E-ISSN: 1876-2816
file format pdf download PDF

Abstract

Abstract

This research set out to determine to what extent the relationship between working in a greenhouse gas intensive sector and climate policy scepticism can be explained by economic insecurity, while also examining the contextual influence of national commitment to climate change mitigation. Focusing on the lower educated of 21 European countries ( = 10.060) and conducting two multilevel analyses, this research found that working in a greenhouse gas intensive sector leads to more climate policy scepticism. This substantiates the idea that values of climate change scepticism are more present in the social environment of more greenhouse gas intensive sectors. This relationship is, however, not substantially explained by economic insecurity. Finally, this research found that working in a greenhouse gas intensive sector does not lead to more economic insecurity and that this relationship is only partially and minimally influenced by an extensive national climate policy agenda.

© 2021 Amsterdam University Press
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/MEM2021.4.003.OOSE
2021-12-01
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/00259454/96/4/03_MEM2021.4_OOSE.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5117/MEM2021.4.003.OOSE&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Abrassart, A.(2013). Cognitive skills matter: The employment disadvantage of low-educated workers in comparative perspective. European Sociological Review, 29(4), 707-719. doi:10.1093/esr/jcs049
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Ambrose, J., & Henley, J. (2019, 15 november). European Investment Bank to phase out fossil fuel financing. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/nov/15/european-investment-bank-to-phase-out-fossil-fuels-financing
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Anderson, C. J., & Pontussen, J.(2007). Workers, worries and welfare states: Social protection and job insecurity in 15 OECD countries. European Journal of Political Research, 46(2), 211-235. doi:10.1111/j.1475‑6765.2007.00692
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Battisti, D. S., & Naylor, R. L.(2009). Historical warnings of future food insecurity with unprecedented seasonal heat. Science, 323(5911). 240-244. doi:10.1126/science.1164363
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bechtel, M. M., Genovese, F., & Scheve, K. F.(2019). Interests, norms and support for the provision of global public goods: The case of climate co-operation. British Journal of Political Science, 49(4), 1333-1355. doi:10.1017/S0007123417000205
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Billiet, J., Meuleman, B., & De Witte, H.(2014). The relationship between ethnic threat and economic insecurity in times of economic crisis: Analysis of European Social Survey data. Migration Studies, 2(2), 135-161. https://doi-org.eur.idm.oclc.org/10.1093/migration/mnu023
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Boykoff, M. T.(2013). Public enemy No. 1?: Understanding media representations of outlier views on climate change. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(6), 796-817. doi:10.1177/0002764213476846
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Boykoff, M. T., & Roberts, J. T.(2007). Media coverage of climate change: Current trends, strengths and weaknesses. Human Development Report 2007/2008. United Nations Development Programme. rockyanderson.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/MediacoverageofCC-current-trends.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Burck, J., Marten, F., & Bals, C.(2015). The Climate Change Performance Index: Results 2016. Germanwatch. https://www.germanwatch.org/sites/germanwatch.org/files/publication/13625.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Burck, J., Marten, F., Höhne, N., Uhlich, T., Riechers, K., Von Rosenberg, V., Gonzales, S., & Moisio, M.(2018). Background and methodology: Climate Change Performance Index. Germanwatch. https://germanwatch.org/sites/germanwatch.org/files/publication/18828.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Clements, B.(2012). Exploring public opinion on the issue of climate change in Britain. British Politics, 7(2), 183-202. https://doi.org/10.1057/bp.2012.1
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Cook, J., Oreskes, N., Doran, P. T., Anderegg, W. R. L., Verheggen, B., Maibach, E. W., Carlton, J. S., Lewandowsky, S., Skuce, A. G., & Green, S. A.(2016). Consensus on consensus: A synthesis of consensus estimates on human-caused global warming. Environmental Research Letters, 11(4), 1-8. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/11/4/048002
     [Google Scholar]
  13. De Bustillo, R. M., & De Pedraza, P.(2010). Determinants of job insecurity in five European countries. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 16(1), 5-20. doi:10.1177/0959680109355306
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Drews, S., & Van den Bergh, J. C. J. M.(2016). What explains public support for climate policies? A review of empirical and experimental studies. Climate Policy, 16(7), 855-867. doi:10.1080/14693062.2015.1058240
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Eurobarometer. (2009). Europeans’ attitudes towards climate change. European Union. https://ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/archives/ebs/ebs_313_en.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Eurobarometer. (2014). Attitudes of European citizens towards the environment. European Union. doi:10.2779/25662
     [Google Scholar]
  17. European Parliament. (2010). The impact of climate change policies on the employment situation: Summary of evidence notice. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2009_2014/documents/empl/dv/climatechangesu mmarynote_/climatechangesummarynote_en.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  18. European Social Survey. (2018a). ESS 8-2016 documentation report: The ESS data archive. https://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/docs/round8/survey/ESS8_data_documentation_report_e02_1.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  19. European Social Survey. (2018b). Version notes, ESS8 Appendix A1 Education. https://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/docs/round8/survey/ESS8_appendix_a1_e02_2.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Eurostat. (2008). NACE Rev. 2: Statistical classification of economic activities in the European Community. Eurostat Methodologies and Working Papers. European Union. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3859598/5902521/KS-RA-07-015-EN.PDF
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Eurostat. (2020a). Air Emissions accounts by NACE Rev. 2 activity. https://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/submitViewTableAction.do
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Eurostat. (2020b). Real GDP per capita. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/sdg_08_10/default/table?lang=en
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Garrouste, C., Kozovska, K., & Arjona Perez, E.(2010). Education and long-term unemployment. Joint Research Center Scientific and Technical Reports. European Union. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/25073/
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Gelissen, J.(2007). Explaining popular support for environmental protection: A multilevel analysis of 50 nations. Environment and Behavior, 39(3), 392-415. doi:10.1177/0013916506292014
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Gesthuizen, M., Solga, H., & Künster, R.(2011). Context matters: Economic marginalization of low educated workers in cross-national perspective. European Sociological Review, 27(2), 264-280. doi:10.1093/esr/jcq006
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Grant, Z. P., & Tilley, J.(2019). Fertile soil: Explaining variation in the success of Green parties. West European Politics, 42(3), 495-516. doi:10.1080/01402382.2018.1521673
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Handel, M. J.(2012). Trends in job skill demands in OECD countries. OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, 143. https://doi.org/10.1787/5k8zk8pcq6td-en
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Heck, R. H., Thomas, S. L., & Tabata, L. N.(2014). Multilevel and Longitudinal Modeling with IBM SPSS. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Heede, R.(2014). Tracing anthropogenic carbon dioxide and methane emissions to fossil fuel and cement producers, 1854-2010. Climate Change, 122, 229-241. doi:10.1007/s10584‑013‑0986‑y
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Hughes, L., & Urpelainen, J.(2015). Interests, institutions, and climate policy: Explaining the choice of policy instruments for the energy sector. Environmental Science & Policy, 54, 52-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.06.014
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Hummels, D., Munch, J. R., & Xiang, C.(2016). Offshoring and labor markets. Institute for the Study of Labor discussion paper, 9741. ftp.iza.org/dp9741.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Humphrey, M.(2013). Green Ideology. In M.Freeden en M.Stears (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Ideologies (pp. 422-438). doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199585977.013.0011
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Jacques, P. J., Dunlap, R. E., & Freeman, M.(2008). The organisation of denial: Conservative think tanks and environmental scepticism. Environmental Politics, 17(3), 349-385. doi:10.1080/09644010802055576
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Klineberg, S. L., McKeever, M., & Rothenbach, B.(1998). Demographic predictors of environmental concern: It does make a difference how it’s measured. Social Science Quarterly, 79(4), 734-753. www.jstor.org/stable/42863844
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Kolstad, C. D.(2014). Who pays for climate change regulation?Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research policy brief. https://siepr.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/publications/SIEPR_PolicyBrief_Kolstad_v4_2.p df
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Kristof-Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. N.(2005). Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: A meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group, and person-supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 281-342. https://doi-org.eur.idm.oclc.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00672.x
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Kvaløy, B., Finseraas, H., & Listhaug, O.(2012). The publics’ concern for global warming: A cross national study of 47 countries. Journal of Peace Research, 49(1), 11-22. doi:10.1177/0022343311425841
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Lewis, G. B., Palm, R., & Feng, B.(2019). Cross-national variation in determinants of climate change concern. Environmental Politics, 28(5). 793-821. doi:10.1080/09644016.2018.1512261
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Lockwood, M.(2018). Right-wing populism and the climate change agenda: Exploring the linkages. Environmental Politics, 27(4), 712-732. doi:10.1080/09644016.2018.1458411
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Manyika, J., Lund, S., Chui, M., Bughin, J., Woetzel, J., Batra, P., Ko, R., & Sanghvi, S.(2017). Jobs lost, jobs gained: Workforce transitions in a time of automation, executive summary.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. McKinsey Global Institute. https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/future-of-work/jobs-lost-jobs-gained-what-the-future-of-work-will-mean-for-jobs-skills-and-wages
  42. McCright, A. M., Dunlap, R. E., & Marquart-Pyatt, S. T. (2016a). Political ideology and views about climate change in the European Union. Environmental Politics, 25(2), 338-358. 10.1080/09644016.2015.1090371
     [Google Scholar]
  43. McCright, A. M., Marquart-Pyatt, S. T., Shwom, R. L., Brechin, S. R., & Allen, S. (2016b). Ideology, capitalism and climate: Explaining public views about climate change in the United States. Energy Research and Social Science, 21, 180-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.08.003
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Michaelowa, A.(2005). The German wind energy lobby: How to promote costly technological change successfully. European Environment, 15(3), 192-199. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.382
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Näswall, K. & De Witte, H.(2003). Who feels insecure in Europe? Predicting job insecurity from background variables. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 24(2), 189-215. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X03024002003
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Pegg, D., & Evans, R. (2019, oktober 19). Revealed: Top UK thinktank spent decades undermining climate science. Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/oct/10/thinktank-climate-science-institute-economic-affairs
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Schmidt, A., Ivanova, A., & Schäfer, M. S.(2013). Media attention for climate change around the world: A comparative analysis of newspaper coverage in 27 countries. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 1233-1248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.07.020
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Schneider, B., Goldstein, H. W., & Smith, D. B.(1995). The ASA framework: An update. Personnel Psychology, 48, 747-773. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01780.x
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Scruggs, L., & Benegal, S.(2012). Declining public concern about climate change: can we blame the great recession?Global Environmental Change, 22(2), 505-515. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.01.002
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Shishlov, I., Morel, R., & Bellassen, V.(2016). Compliance of the parties to the Kyoto Protocol in the first commitment period. Climate Policy, 16(6), 768-782. doi:10.1080/14693062.2016.1164658
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Sikkema, A.(2019). The nitrogen problem in five questions. Resource Magazine. https://resource.wur.nl/en/show/The-nitrogen-problem-in-five-questions.htm#comments
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Smith, T. W., Kim, J., & Son, J.(2017). Public attitudes toward climate change and other environmental issues across countries. International Journal of Sociology, 47(1), 62-80. https://doi-org.eur.idm.oclc.org/10.1080/00207659.2017.1264837
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Spitz-Oener, A.(2006). Technical change, job tasks and rising educational demands: Looking outside the wage structure. Journal of Labor Economics, 24(2), 235-270. doi:10.1086/499972
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Steedman, H., & McIntosh, S.(2001). Measuring low skills in Europe: How useful is the ISCED framework?Oxford Economic Papers, 53(3), 564-581. https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/53.3.564
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Tvinnereim, E., & Ivarsflaten, E.(2016). Fossil fuels, employment and support for climate policies. Energy Policy, 96, 364-371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.05.052
     [Google Scholar]
  56. United Nations(1998). Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/kpeng.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  57. United Nations. (2015). The Paris Agreement. https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/english_paris_agreement.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Van den Berg, S., Sterling, T., & Meijer, B. (2019, 16 oktober). Angry farmers cause Dutch police to close off parliament square. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-netherlands-farmers-protests/angry-farmers-cause-dutch-police-to-close-off-parliament-square-idUSKBN1WV0SZ
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Van Rensburg, W.(2015). Climate change skepticism: A conceptual re-evaluation. SAGE Open Access, 5(2), 1-13. doi:10.1177/2158244015579723
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Whitmarsh, L.(2011). Skepticism and uncertainty about climate change: Dimensions, determinants, and change over time. Global Environmental Change, 21(2), 690-700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.016
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/MEM2021.4.003.OOSE
Loading
De economische dreiging van klimaatverandering
M&M 96, 499 (2021); https://doi.org/10.5117/MEM2021.4.003.OOSE
/content/journals/10.5117/MEM2021.4.003.OOSE
/content/journals/10.5117/MEM2021.4.003.OOSE
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): climate change scepticism; climate policy; economic insecurity; greenhouse gas intensity; organisational culture

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error