2004
Volume 39, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1567-7109
  • E-ISSN: 2468-1652

Abstract

Abstract

Children’s sociometric status refers to their position within the peer group and plays a major role in their future social-cognitive development. It is therefore important to investigate factors that are related to it. Although it has been suggested that one of these factors is children’s level of oral communicative competence, little attention has been paid to its potential role. Therefore, the present study investigated sociometric group differences in the level of oral communicative competence in a sample of = 570 children in early childhood education. Sociometric status was measured using a nomination procedure. Based on peer nominations, children were categorized into five sociometric groups: (1) popular (generally well-liked), (2) rejected (generally disliked), (3) neglected (low visibility and neither liked nor disliked), (4) controversial (high visibility and both liked and disliked), and (5) average (at or about the mean on both likability and visibility). In addition, children’s level of oral communicative competence was assessed with the Nijmegen Test for Pragmatics. Results of multi-level analyses revealed significant sociometric group differences: Children who were rejected or neglected by their peers exhibited lower levels of oral communicative competence than average children. Based on these findings, early childhood teachers are encouraged to pay more explicit attention to the promotion of their pupils’ oral communicative competence.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/PED2019.1.003.WILT
2019-05-01
2021-06-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/15677109/39/1/03_PED2019.1_WILT.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5117/PED2019.1.003.WILT&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Archer, A.(2000). Communicative competence expanded: A ‘multiliteracies’ approach to English Additional Language teaching. English Academy Review, 17(1), 83-96.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Asher, S. R., & Coie, J. D.(1990). Peer rejection in childhood. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  3. Babcock, B., Marks, P.E L., Crick, N.R., & Cillessen, A.H.N.(2014). Limited nomination reliability using single and multiple-item measures. Social Development, 23(3), 518-536.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Black, B., & Hazen, N.L.(1990). Social status and patterns of communication in acquainted and unacquainted preschool children. Developmental Psychology, 26(3), 379-387.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bonica, C., Arnold, D.H., Fisher, P.H., Zeljo, A., & Yershova, K.(2013). Relational aggression, relational victimization, and language development in preschoolers. Social Development, 12(4), 551-561.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bukowski, W.M, Sippola, L.K., Hoza, B., & Newcomb, A.F.(2000). Pages from a sociometric notebook: An analysis of nomination and rating scale measures of acceptance, rejection, and social preference. In T.Cillessen & W.M.Bukowski (Eds.), Recent advances in the study and measurement of acceptance and rejection in the peer system (pp. 11-26). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Celce-Murcia, M.(2008). Rethinking the role of communicative competence in language teaching. In E.A.Soler, & P.S.Jordà (Eds.), Intercultural language use and languagelearning (pp. 41-57). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Central Bureau for Statistics
    Central Bureau for Statistics. (2018, May 15). Population; education level; sex, age and migration background [Data file]. Retrieved from https://opendata.cbs.nl/statline /#/CBS/nl/dataset/82275NED/table?ts=1527449196233
  9. Cillessen, A.H.N.(2009). Sociometric methods. In K. H.Rubin, W.M.Bukowski, & B.Laursen (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (pp. 82-99). New York, NY: The Guildford Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Cillessen, A.H., Bukowski, W.M., & Haselager, G.J.T.(2000). Stability of sociometric categories. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 88, 75-93.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Coie, J.D., Dodge, K.A., & Coppotelli, H.(1982). Dimensions and types of social status: A cross-age perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18(4), 557-570.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Deater-Deckard, K.(2001). Annotation: Recent research examining the role of peer relationships in the development of psychopathology. Child Development, 42(5), 565-579.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Embrechts, M., Mugge, A., & Van Bon, W.(2005). Nijmeegse Pragmatiek Test. Handleiding. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Harcourt Test Publishers.
  14. Flook, L., Repetti, R.L., & Ullman, J.B.(2005). Classroom social experiences as predictors of academic performance. Developmental Psychology, 41(2), 319-327.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Gazelle, H., Faldowski, R.A., & Peter, D.(2015). Using peer sociometrics and behavioral nominations with young children. In O.N.Saracho (Ed.), Handbook of research methods in early childhood education. Review of research methodologies volume I (pp. 27-69). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Gifford-Smith, M.E., & Brownell, C.A.(2003). Childhood peer relationships: Social acceptance, friendships, and peer networks. Journal of School Psychology, 41(4), 235-284.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Godleski, S.A., Kamper, K.E., Ostrov, J.M., Hart, E.J., & Blakely-McClure, S.J.(2015). Peer victimization and peer rejection during early childhood. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 44(3), 380-392.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Gravetter, F.J., & Wallnau, L.B.(2004). Statistics for the behavioral sciences. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
  19. Gremillion, M.L., & Martel, M.M.(2014). Merely misunderstood? Receptive, expressive, and pragmatic language in young children with disruptive behaviour disorders. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 43(5), 765-776.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Griffin, R.S., & Gross, A.M.(2004). Childhood bullying: Current empirical findings and future directions for research. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 9, 379-400.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Gulay, H.(2011). Effects of peer relationships and gender on Turkish children’s language skills. Social Behavior and Personality, 39(7), 979-992.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Hay, D. F., Payne, A., & Chadwick, A.(2004). Peer relations in childhood. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45(1), 84-108.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Holmes, C. J., Kim-Spoon, J, & Deater-Deckard, K.(2016). Linking executive function and peer problems from early childhood through middle adolescence. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 44(1), 31-42.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Hymes, D. H.(1972). On communicative competence. In J. B.Pride and J.Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics: Selected readings (pp. 269-293). Harmondsworth, England: Penguin.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Landis, J. R. & Koch, G. G.(1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159-174.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Leary, M. R., Twenge, J. M., & Quinlivan, E.(2006). Interpersonal rejection as a determinant of anger and aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(2), 111-132.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Lemerise, E. A.(1997). Patterns of peer acceptance, social status, and social reputation in mixed-age preschool and primary classrooms. Merril-Palmer Quarterly, 43(2), 199-218.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. McCabe, P. C., & Meller, P. J.(2004). The relationship between language and social competence: How language impairment affect social growth. Psychology in the Schools, 41(3), 313-321.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Menting, B., van Lier, P. A. C., & Koot, H. M.(2011). Language skills, peer rejection, and the development of externalizing behavior from kindergarten to fourth grade. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 52(1), 72-79.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Moreno, J. L.(1934). A new approach to the problem of human interrelations. Washington, DC: Nervous and Mental Disease Publishing.
  31. Mostow, A.J., Izard, C. E., Fine, S., & Trentacosta, C. J.(2002). Modeling emotional, cognitive, and behavioral predictors of peer acceptance. Child Development, 73(6), 1775-1787.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Nӕrland, T.(2011). Language competence and social focus among preschool children. Early Child Development and Care, 181(5), 599-612.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Nelson, D. A., Burner, K. C., Coyne, S. M., Hart, C. H., & Robinson, C. C.(2016). Correlates of sociometric status in Russian preschoolers: Aggression, victimization, and sociability. Personality and Individual Differences, 94, 332-336.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Nelson, D. A., Robinson, C. C., Hart, C. H., Albano, A. D., & Marshall, S. J.(2010). Italian preschoolers’ peer-status linkages with sociability and subtypes of aggression and victimization. Social Development, 19(4), 698-720.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Newcomb, A.F., Bukowski, W.M., & Pattee, L.(1993). Children’s peer relations: A meta-analytic review of popular, rejected, neglected, controversial, and average sociometric status. Psychological Bulletin, 113(1), 99-128.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Ostrov, J.M., & Gosleski, S.A.(2007). Relational aggression, victimization, and language development: Implications for practice. Topics in Language Disorders27(2), 146-166.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Parker, J.G., Rubin, K.H., Erath, S.A., Wojslawowicz, J.C., & Buskirk, A.A.(2006). Peer relationships, child development, and adjustment: A developmental psychopathology perspective. In D.Cicchetti & D.J.Cohen (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology: Theory and method (pp. 419- 493). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Pedersen, S., Vitaro, F., Barker, E.D., & Borge, A.I.(2007). The timing of middle-childhood peer rejection and friendship: Linking early behavior to early-adolescent adjustment. Child Development, 78(4), 1037-1051.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Rescorla, L., Ross, G. & McClure, S.(2007). Language delay and behavioural/emotional problems in toddlers: Findings from two developmental clinics. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50(4), 1063-1078.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Slaughter, V., Imuta, K., Peterson, C.C., & Henry, J.D.(2016). Meta-analysis of theory of mind and peer popularity in the preschool and early school years. Child Development, 86(4), 1159-1174.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Snijders, T.A.B., & Bosker, R.J.(2004). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modelling. London, England: Sage.
  42. Troesch, L.M., Keller, K., & Grob, A.(2016). Language competence and social preference in childhood: A meta-analysis. European Psychologist, 21(3), 167-179.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Tymms, P.(2004). Effect sizes in multilevel models. In I.Schagen, & K.Elliot (Eds.), But what does it mean? Calculating effect sizes in educational research (pp. 55-66). Slough, England: National Foundation for Educational Research.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Van der Veen, C.(2017). Dialogic classroom talk in early childhood education (Dissertatie). Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Van der Veen, C., Van der Wilt, F., Van Kruistum, C., Van Oers, B., & Michaels, S.(2017). MODEL2TALK: An intervention to promote productive classroom talk. The Reading Teacher, 70(6), 689-700.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Van der Veen, C., Van Renswouw, M., & Pennings, H. (in voorbereiding). The relation between early childhood teachers’ beliefs about oral language teaching and their interpersonal behavior in the classroom.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Van der Wilt, F., Van der Veen, C., Van Kruistum, C., & Van Oers, B.(2018). Why can’t I join? Peer rejection in early childhood education and the role of oral communicative competence. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 54, 247-254.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Van der Wilt, F., Van Kruistum, C., Van der Veen, C., & Van Oers, B.(2016). Gender differences in the relationship between oral communicative competence and peer rejection: An explorative study in early childhood education. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 24(6), 807-817.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Von Grünigen, R., Perren, S., Nägele, C., & Alsaker, F.(2010). Immigrant children’s peeracceptance and victimization in kindergarten: The role of local language competence. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 28(3), 679-697.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Vygotsky, L.S.(1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  51. Woodhouse, S.S., Dykas, M.J., & Cassidy, J.(2012). Loneliness and peer relations in adolescence. Social Development, 21(2), 273-293.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Wu, X., Hart, C.H., Draper, T.W., & Olsen, J.A.(2001). Peer and teacher sociometrics for preschool children: Cross-informant concordance, temporal stability, and reliability. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 47(3), 416-443.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/PED2019.1.003.WILT
Loading
/content/journals/10.5117/PED2019.1.003.WILT
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error