Culturele normen en sensitiviteit | Amsterdam University Press Journals Online
2004
Volume 44, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1567-7109
  • E-ISSN: 2468-1652

Abstract

Samenvatting

In dit artikel wordt een beschrijving gegeven van de belangrijkste inzichten die de auteur de afgelopen 10 jaar heeft opgedaan op basis van videoobservatiestudies van de interactie tussen jonge kinderen en hun verzorgers in landen die maar zelden vertegenwoordigd zijn in gehechtheidsonderzoek. Beperkende culturele normen over wat sensitief opvoederschap is worden kritisch besproken aan de hand van beschrijvingen van het videomateriaal en de gesprekken die het materiaal doorgaans uitlokt tijdens presentaties aan professionals.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/PED2024.1.005.MESM
2024-06-01
2024-07-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/15677109/44/1/PED2024.1.005.MESM.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5117/PED2024.1.005.MESM&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Ainsworth, M. D. S., Bell, S. M., & Stayton, D. J. (1974). Infant-mother attachment and social development: Socialization as a product of reciprocal responsiveness to signals. In M. P. M.Richards (Ed.), The integration of a child into a social world (pp. 99–135). Cambridge: Cambridge University press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Asanjarani, F., Davoud Abadi, F., Ghomi, M., Mesman, J. (2021). Video observations of maternal sensitivity in urban and rural Iran. Attachment and Human Development, 23, 164-175. DOI: 10.1080/14616734.2020.1828532
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Fourment, K., Nóblega, M., Conde, G., Nuñez del Prado, J., & Mesman, J. (2021). Maternal sensitivity in rural Andean and Amazonian Peru. Attachment and Human Development, 23, 134-148. DOI: 10.1080/14616734.2020.1828515
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Hopman, M. (2017). Het evidence-beest en de normativiteit van opvoeding. Pedagogiek, 37(2), 143-155. DOI: 10.5117/PED2017.2.HOPM
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Mesman, J. (2021a). Video observations of sensitive caregiving ‘off the beaten track’: Introduction to the special issue. Attachment and Human Development, 23, 115-123, DOI: 10.1080/14616734.2020.1828511
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Mesman, J. (2021b). Attachment theory’s university claims: asking different questions. In: R.A.Thompson, J.A.Simpson & L.J.Berlin (Eds.), Attachment. The fundamental questions, pp. 245-251. New York: Guilford.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Mesman, J., & Emmen, R. A.G. (2016). Mary Ainsworth’s legacy: A systematic review of observational instruments measuring parental sensitivity. Attachment and Human Development, 15, 485-506. DOI: 10.1080/14616734.2013.820900
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Mesman, J., Minter, T., Angnged, A. (2016). Received sensitivity: Adapting Ainsworth’s scale to capture sensitivity in a multiple-caregiver context. Attachment and Human Development, 18(2), 101-114. DOI: 10.1080/14616734.2015.1133681
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Mesman, J., Minter, T., Angnged, A., Cissé, I. A. H., Salali, G. D., & Migliano, A. B. (2017). Universality without uniformity: A culturally inclusive approach to sensitive responsiveness in infant caregiving. Child Development, 89(3), 837-850. DOI: 10.1111/cdev.12795
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Mesman, J., Van IJzendoorn, M. H., Sagi-Schwartz, A. (2016). Cross-cultural patterns of attachment. Universal and contextual dimensions. In: J.Cassidy & P.Shaver (Eds). Handbook of attachment. Theory, research, and clinical applications, 3rd edition (pp. 852-877). New York, NY: Guilford.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/PED2024.1.005.MESM
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error