2004
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Pedagogiek
  4. Volume 44, Issue 3
  5. Article
Volume 44, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 1567-7109
  • E-ISSN: 2468-1652
file format pdf download PDF

Abstract

Samenvatting

Hoe kan het onderwijs worden vormgegeven zodat mbo-jongeren worden gestimuleerd om te gaan stemmen? In dit onderzoek laten we de resultaten zien van een exploratieve evaluatie van drie sets met leermiddelen met als doel de stemintentie van jongeren te verhogen. De leermiddelen richten zich op (1) informatie over het stemproces, (2) in gesprek gaan over wel of niet stemmen en (3) gesprekken over maatschappelijke onderwerpen in combinatie met het invullen van een stemadviesapplicatie. De leermiddelen zijn gegeven door negen docenten en geëvalueerd door middel van docentinterviews en studentvragenlijsten (N = 172). Uit de resultaten kan worden opgemaakt dat docenten en studenten positief zijn over de praktische benadering in de leermiddelen. Tevens blijkt uit de resultaten dat de leermiddelen studenten inzicht geven in hun politieke voorkeur en dat zij leren het gesprek over stemmen met elkaar aan te gaan. Dit stimuleert mogelijk politiek zelfvertrouwen. Deze resultaten scheppen positieve verwachtingen voor de mogelijke effectiviteit van de lessen die kan worden getoetst in vervolgonderzoek.

© Jip Yri Teegelbeckers & Hessel Nieuwelink. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/PED2024.3.003.TEEG
2024-12-01
2025-02-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/15677109/44/3/PED2024.3.003.TEEG.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5117/PED2024.3.003.TEEG&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Amnå, E. (2012). How is civic engagement developed over time? Emerging answers from a multidisciplinary field. Journal of Adolescence, 35, 611–627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.04.011
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Andersson, K. (2015). Deliberative teaching: Effects on students’ democratic virtues. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 59(5), 604–622. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2014.965789
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Bardwell, K. (2011). Fact checks, voter guides, and GOTV: Civic learning projects in American politics courses. Journal of Political Science Education, 7(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/15512169.2011.539899
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Bennion, E. A. (2005). Caught in the ground wars: Mobilizing voters during a competitive congressional campaign. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 601(1), 123–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716205277863
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bennion, E. A. (2006). Civic education and citizen engagement: Mobilizing voters as a required field experiment. Journal of Political Science Education, 2(2), 205–227. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15512160600686555
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Bennion, E. A., & Nickerson, D. W. (2016). I will register and vote, if you teach me how: A field experiment testing voter registration in college classrooms. PS: Political Science & Politics, 49(4), 867–871. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096516001360
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Bergan, D. E., Carnahan, D., Lajevardi, N., Medeiros, M., Reckhow, S., & Thorson, K. (2021). Promoting the youth vote: The role of informational cues and social pressure. Political Behavior, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-021-09686-x
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Bovens, M. & Wille, A. (2014). Diplomademocratie. Prometheus. https://uitgeverijprometheus.nl/boeken/diplomademocratie-e-boek/
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Campbell, D. E. (2019). What social scientists have learned about civic education: A review of the literature. Peabody Journal of Education, 94(1), 32–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2019.1553601
     [Google Scholar]
  10. De Groot, I. (2018). Political simulations: An opportunity for meaningful democratic participation in schools. Democracy and Education, 26(2), 3. https://democracyeducationjournal.org/home/vol26/iss2/3
     [Google Scholar]
  11. De Groot, I., Daas, R., & Nieuwelink, H. (2022). Netherlands: Education for democratic citizenship in Dutch schools: a bumpy road. Journal of Social Science Education, 21(4). https://doi.org/10.11576/jsse-5381
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Donbavand, S., & Hoskins, B. (2021). Citizenship education for political engagement: A systematic review of controlled trials. Social Sciences, 10(5), 151. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci10050151
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Drerup, J. (2021). Democratic education and the limits of toleration. How to respond to extremism in the classroom. Pedagogiek, 41(3), 251-271. https://doi.org/10.5117/PED2021.3.003.DRER
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Fitzgerald, J. C., Cohen, A. K., Maker Castro, E., & Pope, A. (2021). A systematic review of the last decade of civic education research in the United States. Peabody Journal of Education, 96(3), 235-246. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2021.1942703
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Fivaz, J., & Nadig, G. (2010). Impact of voting advice applications (VAAs) on voter turnout and their potential use for civic education. Policy & Internet, 2(4), 167–200. https://doi.org/10.2202/1944-2866.1025
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Galston, W. A. (2001). Political knowledge, political engagement, and civic education. Annual Review of Political Science, 4(1), 217–234. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.4.1.217
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Garzia, D., & Marschall, S. (2012). Voting advice applications under review: the state of research. International Journal of Electronic Governance, 5(3–4), 203–222. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEG.2012.051309
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Garzia, D., De Angelis, A., & Pianzola, J. (2014). The impact of voting advice applications on electoral participation. In D.Garzia, & S.Marschall (Eds.), Matching Voters with Parties and Candidates. Voting Advice Applications in a Comparative Perspective (pp. 105-114). ECPR Press. https://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/34156
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Geboers, E., Geijsel, F., Admiraal, W., & Ten Dam, G. (2013). Review of the effects of citizenship education. Educational Research Review, 9, 158–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2012.02.001
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Germann, M., & Gemenis, K. (2019). Getting out the vote with voting advice applications. Political Communication, 36(1), 149–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2018.1526237
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Gill, B., Whitesell, E. R., Corcoran, S. P., Tilley, C., Finucane, M., & Potamites, L. (2020). Can charter schools boost civic participation? The impact of democracy prep public schools on voting behavior. American Political Science Review, 114(4), 1386–1392. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305542000057X
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Giroux, H. A., & Penna, A. N. (1979). Social education in the classroom: The dynamics of the hidden curriculum. Theory & Research in Social Education, 7(1), 21-42. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.1979.10506048
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Green, D. P., & Gerber, A. S. (2019). Get Out the Vote: How to Increase Voter Turnout. Brookings Institution Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7864/j.ctt1657t5x
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Green, D. P., Aronow, P. M., Bergan, D. E., Greene, P., Paris, C., & Weinberger, B. I. (2011). Does knowledge of constitutional principles increase support for civil liberties? Results from a randomized field experiment. The Journal of Politics, 73(2), 463–476. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381611000107
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Hess, D. E., & McAvoy, P. (2014). The Political Classroom: Evidence and Ethics in Democratic Education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315738871
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Hirsch Ballin, E. (2022). Waakzaam Burgerschap: Vertrouwen in Democratie en Rechtsstaat Herwinnen. Amsterdam: Querido. https://www.singeluitgeverijen.nl/querido/boek/waakzaam-burgerschap/
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Holbein, J., & Hillygus, D. (2020). Making Young Voters: Converting Civic Attitudes into Civic Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108770446
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Hooghe, M. (2017). Citizenship and participation. In L.LeDuc, R. G.Niemi, & P.Norris (Eds.), Comparing Democracies: Elections and Voting in a Changing World (pp. 58-75). SAGE Publications, Inc.https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473921108
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Hooghe, M., & Dassonneville, R. (2013). Voters and candidates of the future: The intention of electoral participation among adolescents in 22 European countries. Young, 21(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1103308812467664
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Hoskins, B., Janmaat, J. G., Han, C., & Muijs, D. (2016). Inequalities in the education system and the reproduction of socioeconomic disparities in voting in England, Denmark and Germany: The influence of country context, tracking and self-efficacy on voting intentions of students age 16–18. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 46(1), 69–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2014.912796
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Isac, M. M., Maslowski, R., Creemers, B., & Van der Werf, G. (2014). The contribution of schooling to secondary-school students’ citizenship outcomes across countries. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 25(1), 29-63. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2012.751035
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Kamoen, N., Holleman, B., Krouwel, A., Van de Pol, J., & De Vreese, C. (2015). The effect of voting advice applications on political knowledge and vote choice. Irish Political Studies, 30(4), 595–618. https://doi.org/10.1080/07907184.2015.1099096
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Kiesel, L. R., Piescher, K. N., & Edleson, J. L. (2016). The relationship between child maltreatment, intimate partner violence exposure, and academic performance. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 10(4), 434-456. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15548732.2016.1209150
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Krings, A., Austic, E. A., Gutiérrez, L. M., & Dirksen, K. E. (2015). The comparative impacts of social justice educational methods on political participation, civic engagement, and multicultural activism. Equity & Excellence in Education, 48(3), 403–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2015.1057087
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Kruikemeier, S., Van Noort, G., Vliegenthart, R., & de Vreese, C. H. (2014). Unraveling the effects of active and passive forms of political internet use: Does it affect citizens’ political involvement?. New Media & Society, 16(6), 903–920. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813495163
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Levy, B. L., & Akiva, T. (2019). Motivating political participation among youth: An analysis of factors related to adolescents’ political engagement. Political Psychology, 40(5), 1039–1055. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12578
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Levy, B. L., Babb-Guerra, A., Owczarek, W., & Batt, L. M. (2019). Can education reduce political polarization?: Fostering open-minded political engagement during the legislative semester. Teachers College Record, 121(5), 1–40. https://scholarsarchive.library.albany.edu/etap_fac_scholar/29
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Lijphart, A. (2012). Patterns of Democracy. Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-six Countries (2nd ed.). Yale University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt32bg23
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Lijphart, A. (2015). Polarization and democratization. In N.Persily (Ed.), Solutions to Political Polarization in America (pp. 73-82). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316091906.004
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Manganelli, S., Lucidi, F., & Alivernini, F. (2014). Adolescents’ expected civic participation: The role of civic knowledge and efficacy beliefs. Journal of Adolescence, 37(5), 632-641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2014.05.001
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Manning, N., & Edwards, K. (2014). Does civic education for young people increase political participation? A systematic review. Educational Review, 66(1), 22–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2013.763767
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Maurissen, L. (2020). Political efficacy and interest as mediators of expected political participation among Belgian adolescents. Applied Developmental Science, 24(4), 339–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1507744
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Merry, M. S. (2021). Burgerschapseducatie zal ons niet redden. Pedagogiek, 41(3), 272–295. https://doi.org/10.5117/PED2021.3.004.MERR
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2019) Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). SAGE Publishing. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/qualitative-data-analysis/book246128
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Miller, P., Reynolds, R., & Singer, M. (2017). Mobilizing the young vote: Direct mail voter guides in the 2015 Chicago mayoral election. Research & Politics, 4(4), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F2053168017738410
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Munzert, S., & Ramirez-Ruiz, S. (2021). Meta-Analysis of the effects of voting advice applications. Political Communication, 1–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1843572
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Myoung, E., & Liou, P. Y. (2022). Adolescents’ political socialization at school, citizenship self-efficacy, and expected electoral participation. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 51(7), 1305-1316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-022-01581-w
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Niemi, R. G., & Sobieszek, B. I. (1977). Political socialization. Annual Review of Sociology, 3(1), 209-233. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.03.080177.001233
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Nieuwelink, H. (2016). Becoming a Democratic Citizen. A Study Among Adolescents in Different Educational Tracks. Academisch proefschrift. Universiteit van Amsterdam. https://hdl.handle.net/11245/1.534741
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Nieuwelink, H., & Oostdam, R. (2021). Time for citizenship in teacher training. Journal of Social Science Education, 20(3), 130-146. https://doi.org/10.11576/jsse-4030
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Nieuwelink, H., Daas, R., & Teegelbeckers, J. Y. (2022). Burgerschapsonderwijs via het beeldscherm: Ervaringen van leraren met het geven van burgerschapsonderwijs op afstand tijdens de eerste COVID-19-lockdown. Pedagogische Studiën, 99(1). https://pedagogischestudien.nl/article/view/13726
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Öhrvall, R., & Oskarsson, S. (2020). Practice makes voters? Effects of student mock elections on turnout. Politics, 40(3), 377-393. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263395719875110
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Ozer, E. J., & Douglas, L. (2013). The impact of participatory research on urban teens: An experimental evaluation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 51(1–2), 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-012-9546-2
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Persson, M. (2015). Education and political participation. British Journal of Political Science, 689–703. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123413000409
     [Google Scholar]
  55. ProDemos. (2021). Prodemos: Jaarverslag 2021. https://prodemos.nl/app/uploads/2023/01/ProDemos-2021-Jaarverslag.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Quintelier, E. (2015). Engaging adolescents in politics: The longitudinal effect of political socialization agents. Youth & Society, 47(1), 51-69. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X13507295
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Raad voor het Openbaar Bestuur. (2019). Jong geleerd, oud gedaan: Pleidooi voor experimenten met het verlagen van de kiesgerechtigde leeftijd. Den Haag: RoB. https://www.raadopenbaarbestuur.nl/documenten/publicaties/2019/06/24/jong-geleerd-oud-gedaan
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Rekker, R. (2018). De keuze van jongeren. In T.Van der Meer, H.Van der Kolk, & R.Rekker (Eds.), Aanhoudend Wisselvallig: Nationaal Kiezersonderzoek 2017 (pp. 48-56). Amsterdam: Stichting Kiezersonderzoek Nederland. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323387284_Aanhoudend_wisselvallig_Nationaal_Kiezersonderzoek_2017
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Schakel, W., & Hakhverdian, A. (2018). Ideological congruence and socio-economic inequality. European Political Science Review, 10(3), 441-465. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773918000036
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Schakel, W., & Van der Pas, D. (2021). Degrees of influence: Educational inequality in policy representation. European Journal of Political Research, 60(2), 418–437. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12405
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Schimmel, D. M. (2003). Collaborative rule-making and citizenship education: An antidote to the undemocratic hidden curriculum. American Secondary Education, 16-35. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41064494
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Schrauwen, A. (2013). EUDO Citizenship Observatory: Access to electoral rights: The Netherlands. (EUDO Citizenship Observatory Country Reports). Florence: European University Institute. https://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/29820
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Schulz, W. (2005). Political efficacy and expected participation among lower and upper secondary students. A comparative analysis with data from the IEA Civic Education Study. ECPR General Conference. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED499264
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Starrenburg, J., Elawi, J., Das, D., & Diederen, P. (2023). Mij niet gezien: Een verkenning van de opvattingen van mbo-studenten over democratische innovaties. Rathenau Instituut. Den Haag. https://www.rathenau.nl/nl/digitalisering/mij-niet-gezien
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Teegelbeckers, J. Y., Nieuwelink, H., & Oostdam, R. J. (2023). School-based teaching for democracy: A systematic review of teaching methods in quantitative intervention studies. Educational Research Review, 100511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100511
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Thijs, J., Wansink, B., & Verkuyten, M. (2021). Verdraagzaamheid in het secundair onderwijs. Pedagogiek, 41(3), 317-340. https://doi.org/10.5117/PED2021.3.006.THIJ
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Torney-Purta, J., Henry Barber, C., & Richardson, W. K. (2004). Trust in government-related institutions and political engagement among adolescents in six countries. Acta Politica, 39(4), 380-406. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500080
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Ulbig, S. G., & Waggener, T. (2011). Getting registered and getting to the polls: The impact of voter registration strategy and information provision on turnout of college students. PS: Political Science & Politics, 44(3), 544–551. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096511000643
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Vaessen, A., Daas, R., & Nieuwelink, H. (2022). All things considered: The views of adolescents in vocational education on competing democratic values. Citizenship. Social and Economics Education, 21(1), 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/20471734211050290
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Van Kesteren, B. (1993). Applications of De Groot’s “learner report”: A tool to identify educational objectives and learning experiences. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 19(1), 65–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-491X(05)80057-4
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Vercellotti, T., & Matto, E. C. (2016). The role of media use in the classroom and at home in improving news consumption and political knowledge. Journal of Political Science Education, 12(2), 151–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/15512169.2015.1067624
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Wanders, F. (2023). Democratische gezindheid van jongeren: Kennis, houding, gedrag en de rol van burgerschapsonderwijs. ProDemos. https://prodemos.nl/app/uploads/2023/11/ProDemos-rapport-Democratische-gezindheid-van-Nederlandse-adolescenten.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Wille, A. (2018). Ongelijkheid en de hoogopgeleide participatie-elite. In T.Van der Meer, H.Van der Kolk, & R.Rekker (Eds.), Aanhoudend Wisselvallig: Nationaal Kiezersonderzoek 2017 (pp. 58-65). Amsterdam: Stichting Kiezersonderzoek Nederland. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323387284_Aanhoudend_wisselvallig_Nationaal_Kiezersonderzoek_2017
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Willeck, C., & Mendelberg, T. (2022). Education and political participation. Annual Review of Political Science, 25, 89–110. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051120-014235
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Zhang, S. (2010). Secondary preservice teachers’ perspectives on teacher self-disclosure as citizenship curriculum. Action in Teacher Education, 32(2), 82-96. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2010.10463552
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.5117/PED2024.3.003.TEEG
Loading
Versterken van stemintentie onder jongeren in het middelbaar beroepsonderwijs: Een exploratieve evaluatie van evidence-informed leermiddelen over stemmen.1
Pedagogiek 44, 265 (2024); https://doi.org/10.5117/PED2024.3.003.TEEG
/content/journals/10.5117/PED2024.3.003.TEEG
/content/journals/10.5117/PED2024.3.003.TEEG
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Keyword(s): Burgerschap; Citizenship; Democracy; Democratie; Elections; Middelbaar beroepsonderwijs; Stemmen; Verkiezingen; Vocational education; Voting

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error