Entertainment-Education in het nieuwe medialandschap

References

1. Abidin, C. (2017). #familygoals: Family Influencers, Calibrated Amateurism, and Justifying Young Digital Labor. Social Media + Society, 3 (2), 205630511770719.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory.Prentice-Hall, Inc.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bandura, A. (2004). Health Promotion by Social Cognitive Means. Health Education & Behavior, 31(2), 143-164.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Barberá, P., Jost, J. T., Nagler, J., Tucker, J. A., & Bonneau, R. (2015). Tweeting From Left to Right. Psychological Science, 26(10), 1531-1542.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bastian, M., Heymann, S., & Jacomy, M. (2009). Gephi: An Open Source Software for Exploring and Manipulating Networks. AAAI. http://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/09/paper/view/154
   [Google Scholar]
6. Blank, G., & Reisdorf, B. C. (2012). The Participatory Web. Information, Communication & Society, 15(4), 537-554.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Blondel, V. D., Guillaume, J. L., Lambiotte, R., & Lefebvre, E. (2008). Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2008 (10), P10008.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bouman, M. (1999). The Turtle and the Peacock: Collaboration for prosocial change. The Entertainment-Education strategy on television.Landbouwuniversiteit Wageningen. https://library.wur.nl/WebQuery/wurpubs/fulltext/164907
   [Google Scholar]
9. Bouman, M. (2002). Turtles and Peacocks: Collaboration in Entertainment-Education Television. Communication Theory, 12(2), 225-244.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Bouman, M., Drossaert, C. H. C., & Pieterse, M. E. (2012). Mark My Words: The Design of an Innovative Methodology to Detect and Analyze Interpersonal Health Conversations in Web and Social Media. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 30(3–4), 312–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228835.2012.743394
    [Google Scholar]
11. Bouman, M., Maas, L., & Kok, G. (1998). Health education in television entertainment – Medisch Centrum West: a Dutch drama serial. Health Education Research: Theory and Practice, 13(4), 503-518.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Broniatowski, D. A., Jamison, A. M., Qi, S., AlKulaib, L., Chen, T., Benton, A., Quinn, S. C., & Dredze, M. (2018). Weaponized Health Communication: Twitter Bots and Russian Trolls Amplify the Vaccine Debate. American Journal of Public Health, e1-e7.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Cadwalladr, C. (2018). ‘I made Steve Bannon’s psychological warfare tool’: meet the data war whistleblower. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/mar/17/data-war-whistleblower-christopher-wylie-faceook-nix-bannon-trump
    [Google Scholar]
14. Cense, M. & Oostrik, S. (2015). Beat the Macho - Onderzoeksrapport. https://rutgers.nl/onderzoeken/beat-the-macho/
    [Google Scholar]
15. Chatterjee, J. S., Sangalang, A., & Cody, M. J. (2017). Entertainment-Education. In P.Rössler, C. A.Hoffner, & L.Zoonen (Eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Media Effects (pp. 1-12).
    [Google Scholar]
16. Clark, W., Couldry, N., MacDonald, R., & Stephansen, H. C. (2015). Digital platforms and narrative exchange: Hidden constraints, emerging agency. New Media & Society, 17(6), 919-938.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Couldry, N. (2008). Mediatization or Mediation? Alternative Understandings of the Emergent Space of Digital Storytelling. New Media & Society, 10(3), 373-391.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Dumitrica, D. (2016). The truth about algorithms. OpenDemocracy. https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/digitaliberties/truth-about-algorithms/
    [Google Scholar]
19. Erasmus University Rotterdam. (2015). Nieuwe leerstoel slaat brug tussen media, gezondheid en wetenschap. https://www.eur.nl/nieuws/nieuwe-leerstoel-slaat-brug-tussen-media-gezondheid-en-wetenschap
    [Google Scholar]
20. Europese Commissie. (2019). EU data protection rules. https://ec.europa.eu/info/priorities/justice-and-fundamental-rights/data-protection/2018-reform-eu-data-protection-rules/eu-data-protection-rules_en
    [Google Scholar]
21. Fisher, E., O’Rourke, M., Evans, R., Kennedy, E. B., Gorman, M. E., & Seager, T. P. (2015). Mapping the integrative field: taking stock of socio-technical collaborations. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 2(1), 39-61.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Fisser, E. (2015). “Ik ga niet zonder hoesje in jouw poesje” ... en meer jongerentaal.Prezi. https://prezi.com/6pxpvwjpl4kh/hoesje-poesje/
    [Google Scholar]
23. Fotopoulou, A., & Couldry, N. (2015). Telling the story of the stories: online content curation and digital engagement. Information, Communication & Society, 18(2), 235-249.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Frank, L. B., Murphy, S. T., Chatterjee, J. S., Moran, M. B., & Baezconde-Garbanati, L. (2015). Telling Stories, Saving Lives: Creating Narrative Health Messages. Health Communication, 30 (2).
    [Google Scholar]
25. Gibney, A. (2014). Finding Fela!Kino Lorber.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Gonzalez-Bailon, S. (2017). Decoding the Social World: Data Science and the Unintended Consequences of Communication (Information Policy) (Illustrated ed.). The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701-721.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2005). Persuasiveness of Narratives . In M. C.Green & T. C.Brock (Eds.), Persuasion - Psychological Insights and Perspectives (pp. 117–142). Sage Publications, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Helmond, A. (2015). The Platformization of the Web: Making Web Data Platform Ready. Social Media and Society, 1 (2).
    [Google Scholar]
30. Horton, D., & Wohl, R. (1956). Mass Communication and Para-Social Interaction: Observation on Intimacy at a Distance. Psychiatry, 19, 215-229.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Isaac, M. (2016, November22). Facebook Said to Create Censorship Tool to Get Back Into China. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/22/technology/facebook-censorship-tool-china.html
    [Google Scholar]
32. Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. New York University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Jenkins, H. (2007). Transmedia Storytelling 101. Confessions of an Aca-Fan. http://henryjenkins.org/2007/03/transmedia_storytelling_101.html
    [Google Scholar]
34. Jenkins, H. (2009). If It Doesn’t Spread, It’s Dead (Part One): Media Viruses and Memes. Confessions of an Aca-Fan. http://henryjenkins.org/2009/02/if_it_doesnt_spread_its_dead_p.html
    [Google Scholar]
35. Jenkins, H. (2010). Transmedia Storytelling and Entertainment: An annotated syllabus. Continuum, 24 (6), 943–958.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Jenkins, H., Ford, S., & Green, J. (2013). Spreadable Media: Creating Value And Meaning In A Networked Culture. New York University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Kata, A. (2010). A postmodern Pandora’s box: Anti-vaccination misinformation on the Internet. Vaccine, 28(7), 1709-1716.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Kata, A. (2012). Anti-vaccine activists, Web 2.0, and the postmodern paradigm – An overview of tactics and tropes used online by the anti-vaccination movement. Vaccine, 30(25), 3778-3789.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Kearney, M. W. (2017). rtweet: Collecting Twitter Data. https://cran.r-project.org/package=rtweet
    [Google Scholar]
40. Kligler-Vilenchik, N., & Thorson, K. (2015). Good citizenship as a frame contest: Kony2012, memes, and critiques of the networked citizen. New Media & Society, 18(9), 1993-2011.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Knobel, M., & Lankshear, C. (2007). Online memes, affinities, and cultural production. In C.Lankshear, M.Knobel, C.Bigum, & M.Peters (Eds.), A New Literacies Sampler (pp. 199-227). Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Lambert, J. (2012). Digital Storytelling: Capturing Lives, Creating Community (4th ed.). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Langner, S., Hennigs, N., & Wiedmann, K.-P. (2013). Social persuasion: targeting social identities through social influencers. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 30(1), 31-49.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Livingstone, S. (2004). The Challenge of Changing Audiences. European Journal of Communication, 19(1), 75-86.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Lutkenhaus, R. O., & Bouman, M. P. A. (2017). #Vaccinatie. Conversatienetwerken op Twitter.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Lutkenhaus, R. O., Jansz, J., & Bouman, M. P. A. (2019). Mapping the Dutch vaccination debate on Twitter: Identifying communities, narratives, and interactions. Vaccine: X, 1, 100019.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Lutkenhaus, R. O., Jansz, J., & Bouman, M. P. A. A. (2020). Toward spreadable entertainment-education: leveraging social influence in online networks. Health Promotion International, 35(5), 1241-1250.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Ministerie van Volksgezondheid, Welzijn en Sport, Erasmus MC, Erfocentrum, NEMO Kennislink, NPV, & Instituut, R. (2020). DNA Dialoog. Over het genetisch aanpassen van embryo’s. https://dnadialoog.nl/
    [Google Scholar]
49. Moran, M. B., Murphy, S. T., Frank, L., & Baezconde-Garbanati, L. (2013). The Ability of Narrative Communication to Address Health-related Social Norms. International Review of Social Research, 3(2), 131-149.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Moyer-Gusé, E. (2008). Toward a theory of entertainment persuasion: Explaining the persuasive effects of entertainment-education messages. Communication Theory, 18(3), 407-425.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Murphy, S. T., Frank, L. B., Chatterjee, J. S., & Baezconde-Garbanati, L. (2013). Narrative versus Nonnarrative: The Role of Identification, Transportation, and Emotion in Reducing Health Disparities. Journal of Communication, 63(1), 116-137.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Myrick, D., & Sánchez, E. (1999). The Blair Witch Project.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Nieuwsuur. (2011). Hoesje Poesje schopt het tot in de kamer! YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AUwPyYowB3g
    [Google Scholar]
54. OECD. (2017). Participative web: user-created content. http://www.oecd.org/internet/ieconomy/38393115.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
55. Papa, M. J., Singhal, A., Law, S., Pant, S., Sood, S., Rogers, E. M., & Shefner-Rogers, C. L. (2000). Entertainment-Education and Social Change: An Analysis of Parasocial Interaction, Social Learning, Collective Efficacy, and Paradoxical communication. Journal of Communication, 50(4), 31-55.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Pariser, E. (2012). The Filter Bubble: How the New Personalized Web Is Changing What We Read and How We Think. Penguin Books.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., Stratham, A. J., & Priester, J. R. (2005). To Think or Not to Think: Exploring Two Routes to Persuasion. In T. C.Brock & M. C.Green (Eds.), Persuasion: Psychological Insights and Perspectives (2nd edition, pp. 81-116). SAGE Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
58. RIVM. (2017). Vaccinatiegraad en jaarverslag Rijksvaccinatieprogramma Nederland 2016. http://www.rivm.nl/dsresource?objectid=2807c63f-3223-4f2e-b488-7e3126b03072&type=pdf&disposition=inline
    [Google Scholar]
59. Rogers, R. (2009). The End of the Virtual - Digital methods. http://site.ebrary.com/id/10363484
    [Google Scholar]
60. Rogers, R., & Niederer, S. (2019). The politics of social media manipulation (R.Rogers & S.Niederer (Eds.)). Digital Methods Initiative, Media Studies. https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/binaries/rijksoverheid/documenten/rapporten/2019/10/18/rapport-politiek-en-sociale-media-manipulatie/rapport-politiek-en-sociale-media-manipulatie.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
61. Scolari, C. A. (2009). Transmedia Storytelling: Implicit Consumers, Narrative Worlds, and Branding in Contemporary Media Production. International Journal of Communication, 3, 586-606.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Sense.info. (2015). MC Fit & Adje - Luister naar Jezelf (Official Video) [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gElabqH5zhU&feature=youtu.be
    [Google Scholar]
63. Singhal, A., Cody, M. J., Rogers, E. M., & Sabido, M. (2004). Entertainment-Education and Social Change: History, Research, and Practice (A.Singhal, M. J.Cody, E. M.Rogers, & M.Sabido (Eds.)). LEA.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Singhal, A., & Rogers, E. M. (2002). A Theoretical Agenda for Entertainment-Education. Communication Theory TA - TT -, 12(2), 117-135.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Slater, M. D., & Rouner, D. (2002). Entertainment-Education and Elaboration Likelihood: Understanding the Processing of Narrative Persuasion. Communication Theory, 12(2), 173-191.
    [Google Scholar]
66. Sood, S., Menard, T., & Witte, K. (2004). The theory behind entertainment-education. In A.Singhal, M. J.Cody, E. M.Rogers, & M.Sabido (Eds.), Entertainment-Education and Social Change (pp. 117-149). LEA.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Storey, D. (1998). Discourse, popular culture and entertainment-education for sustainable health communication: Lessons learned from Pakistan and Indonesia. In T. Jacobsen & J.Servaes (Eds.), Theoretical approaches to participatory communication. Hampton Press.
    [Google Scholar]
68. Team DylanHaegens, & Soa Aids Nederland. (2011). Ik ga niet zonder hoesje in jouw poesje! [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U_hr4TLjieo
    [Google Scholar]
69. Tufekci, Z. (2015). Algorithmic Harms beyond Facebook and Google: Emergent Challenges of Computational Agency. Colorado Technology Law Journal, 13(2), 203-218.
    [Google Scholar]
70. Van Dijck, J. (2009). Users like you? Theorizing agency in user-generated content. Media, Culture & Society, 31(1), 41-58.
    [Google Scholar]
71. Van Eldik, A. K., Kneer, J., & Jansz, J. (2019). Urban & Online: Social Media Use among Adolescents and Sense of Belonging to a Super-Diverse City. Media and Communication, 7 (2), 242.
    [Google Scholar]
72. Waysdorf, A. (2017). Placing fandom. Film tourism in contemporary fan culture [Erasmus University Rotterdam]. https://repub.eur.nl/pub/102767
    [Google Scholar]
73. Weber, P., & Wirth, W. (2014). When and How Narratives Persuade: The Role of Suspension of Disbelief in Didactic Versus Hedonic Processing of a Candidate Film. Journal of Communication, 64(1), 125-144.
    [Google Scholar]