OA

Behind the Rainbow Flag

References

1. Amnesty International (2024). LGBT rights. Retrieved 19June2024, from https://www.amnesty.org/en/what-we-do/discrimination/lgbti-rights/
   [Google Scholar]
2. Ashforth, B.E., Harrison, S., & Corley, K.G. (2008). Identification in organisations: An examination of four fundamental questions. Journal of Management, 34(3), 325–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308316059
   [Google Scholar]
3. Balogun, J., Bartunek, J.M., & Do, B. (2015). Senior managers’ sensemaking and responses to strategic change. Organisation Science, 26(4), 960–979.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Browne, K., & Nash, C.J. (Eds.) (2016). Queer methods and methodologies: Intersecting queer theories and social science research. Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Carroll, A.B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organisational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Champlin, S., & Li, M. (2020). Communicating support in pride collection advertising: The impact of gender expression and contribution amount. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 14(3), 160–178.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Chatterji, A.K., & Toffel, M.W. (2018). The new CEO activists. A playbook for polarized times. Harvard Business Review, 96(1), 78–89.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Ciszek, E. (2020). ‘We are people, not transactions’: Trust as a precursor to dialogue with LGBTQ publics. Public Relations Review, 46(2020), 101759.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Ciszek, E., & Lim, H.S. (2021). Perceived brand authenticity and LGBTQ publics: How LGBTQ practitioners understand authenticity. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 15(5), 395–409.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Ciszek, E., & Pounders, K. (2020). The bones are the same: An exploratory analysis of authentic communication with LGBTQ publics. Journal of Communication Management, 24(2), 103–117.
    [Google Scholar]
12. COC (2023, 5August). COC bij Pride: Stop de stagnatie van de LHBTI+ emancipatie! [COC at Pride: Stop the stagnation of LGBTI+ emancipation!]. https://coc.nl/blog/2023/08/05/stop-de-stagnatie-van-de-lhbti-emancipatie/
    [Google Scholar]
13. COC (2024). About COC. Retrieved 24June2024, from https://coc.nl/en/engels/
    [Google Scholar]
14. COC (2024, 15May). Nederland blijft steken op 14e plek LHBTI+ mensenrechtenindex [The Netherlands remains stuck in 14th place on the LGBTI+ human rights index]. https://coc.nl/blog/2024/05/15/nederland-blijft-steken-op-14e-plek-lhbti-mensenrechtenindex/
    [Google Scholar]
15. De Cock, M. (2017, 23September). Uniseks. Het Parool. Media, p. 59
    [Google Scholar]
16. Dhanesh, G.S. (2024). Communicating corporate social advocacy (CSA) in polarized times: A stoic turn from dancing to wrestling. Business Horizons.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Dodd, M.D., & Supa, D.W. (2014). Conceptualizing and measuring ‘corporate social advocacy’ communication: Examining the impact on corporate. financial performance. Public Relations Journal, 8(3).
    [Google Scholar]
18. Flores, A.R. (2021). Social acceptance of LGBT people in 174 countries: 1981 to 2020. UCLA Williams Institute. https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/publications/global-acceptance-index-lgbt/
    [Google Scholar]
19. Fröhlich, R., & Knobloch, A.S. (2021). ‘Are they allowed to do that?’ Content and typology of corporate socio-political positioning on Twitter. Public Relations Review, 47(5), 102113.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Golafshani, N. (2015). Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Grandey, A.A., Foo, S.C., Groth, M., & Goodwin, R.E. (2012). Free to be you and me: A climate of authenticity alleviates burnout from emotional labor. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 17(1), 1–14.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Hekma, G., & Duyvendak, J.W. (2011). The Netherlands: Depoliticization of homosexuality and homosexualization of politics. In D.Paternotte & M.Tremblay (Eds.), The Lesbian and Gay Movement and the State: Comparative insights into a transformed relationship (1st ed.). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
23. HEMA (n.d.-a) About us. Retrieved 24June2024, from https://corporate.hema.com/en/about-us/
    [Google Scholar]
24. HEMA (n.d.-b). HEMA Pride. Retrieved 9October2023, from https://www.HEMA.nl/geschiedenis/pride
    [Google Scholar]
25. Het Parool (2016, 8August). Terugblik: Dit was de EuroPride 2016 [Flashback: This was the EuroPride 2016]. https://www.parool.nl/nieuws/terugblik-dit-was-de-europride-2016~b53855b9/
26. Hong, C., & Li, C. (2020). To support or to boycott: A public segmentation model in corporate social advocacy. Journal of Public Relations Research, 32(5-6), 160–177.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Hughes, T.L., Bochicchio, L., Drabble, L., Muntinga, M., Jukema, J.S., Veldhuis, C.B., Bruck, S., & Bos, H. (2023). Health disparities in one of the world’s most progressive countries: A scoping review of mental health and substance use among sexual and gender minority people in the Netherlands. BMC Public Health, 23(2533).
    [Google Scholar]
28. Hydock, C., Paharia, N., & Blair, S. (2020). Should your brand pick a side? How market share determines the impact of corporate political advocacy. Journal of Marketing Research, 57(6), 1135–1151.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Kallio, H., Pietilä, A.M., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: Developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(12), 2954–2965.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Kates, S.M. (2004). The dynamics of brand legitimacy: An interpretive study in the gay men’s community. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(2), 455–464.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Kim, J.K., Overton, H., Bhalla, N., & Li, J. (2020). Nike, Colin Kaepernick, and the politicization of sports: Examining perceived organisational motives and public responses. Public Relations Review, 46(2), 101856.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Kim, Y., & Meganck, S. (2024). Fostering employee support for corporate social advocacy (CSA) through dialogic internal communication and transformational leadership. Journal of Public Relations Research, 37(1–2), 189–208.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Korstjens, I., & Moser, A. (2017). Practical guidance to qualitative research: Trustworthiness and publishing. European Journal of General Practice, 24(1), 120–124.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Lee, E. (2024). Perceived authenticity in corporate social advocacy: Conceptualization and measurement scale development. Journal of Public Relations Research, 1–32.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Lee, Y., Li, J.Y., Tao, W., & Ma, S.M. (2024). Toward an authentic corporate social advocacy (CSA): An internal perspective of BLM advocacy. Public Relations Review, 50(5), 102508.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Lehman, D., Lockwood, C., O’Connor, K., Carroll, G.R., Kovács, B., Negro, G., Schultz, M., & Suddaby, R. (2019). The dark side of authenticity in organisational life. Academy of Management, 13(1), 1–42.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Lim, H.S., Ciszek, E., & Moon, W.K. (2022). Perceived organizational authenticity in LGBTQ communication: the scale development and initial empirical findings. Journal of Communication Management, 26(2), 187–206.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Lim, J.S., & Young, C. (2021). Effects of issue ownership, perceived fit, and authenticity in corporate social advocacy on corporate reputation. Public Relations Review, 47(4), 102071.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Maks-Solomon, C., & Drewry, J. (2020). Why do corporations engage in LGBT rights activism? LGBT employee groups as internal pressure groups. Business and Politics, 23(1), 124–152.
    [Google Scholar]
40. McIntosh, M.J., & Morse, J.M. (2015) Situating and constructing diversity in semi-structured interviews. Global Qualitative Nursing Research, 2.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Miller, K.E. (2022). Employee sensemaking of CSR: On micro-discourses of corporate social responsibility. Corporate Communications, 28(3), 469–488.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Molleda, J.C. & Henderson, A. (2010). Authenticity and the construct’s dimensions in public relations and communication research. Journal of Communication Management, 14(3), 223–236.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Moreno, F., & Kang, J. (2020). How to alleviate consumer skepticism concerning corporate responsibility: The role of content and delivery in CSR communications. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(6), 2477–2490.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Mulder, J. (2023, 4August). Why there are fewer big brand campaigns for Pride Amsterdam 2023. Adformatie. https://www.adformatie.nl/creatie/campagnes/waarom-er-minder-grote-merkcampagnes-voor-pride-amsterdam-2023-zijn
    [Google Scholar]
45. Peitzmeier, S., Gardner, I., Weinand, J., Corbet, A., & Acevedo, K. (2017). Health impact of chest binding among transgender adults: A community-engaged, cross-sectional study. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 19(1), 64–75.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Pope, S., & Wæraas, A. (2016). CSR-washing is rare: A conceptual framework, literature review, and critique. Journal of Business Ethics, 137, 173–193.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Pride Amsterdam (2022, 17January). Geschiedenis. Retrieved 9October2023, from https://pride.amsterdam/organisatie/geschiedenis/
    [Google Scholar]
48. Rim, H., Lee, Y.A., & Yoo, S. (2020). Polarized public opinion responding to corporate social advocacy: Social network analysis of boycotters and advocators. Public Relations Review, 46(2), 101869.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Ritchie, J. (2014). Pinkwashing, homonationalism, and Israel–Palestine: The conceits of queer theory and the politics of the ordinary. Antipode, 47, 616–634.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Roberts, K., Dowell, A., & Nie, J.B. (2019). Attempting rigour and replicability in thematic analysis of qualitative research data: A case study of codebook development. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 19(66).
    [Google Scholar]
51. Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., Baker, S., Waterfield, J., Bartlam, B., Burroughs, H., & Jinks, C. (2017). Saturation in qualitative research: Exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality & Quantity, 52, 1893–1907.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Schaefer, S.D., Terlutter, R., & Diehl, S. (2019). Is my company really doing good? Factors influencing employees’ evaluation of the authenticity of their company’s corporate social responsibility engagement. Journal of Business Research, 101, 128–143.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Schopper, T., Berbers, A., & Vogelgsang, L. (2024). Pride or rainbow-washing? Exploring LGBTQ+ advertising from the vested stakeholder perspective. Journal of Advertising, 1–18.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Shen, H., & Kim, J.N. (2012). The authentic enterprise: Another buzz word, or a true driver of quality relationships? Journal of Public Relations Research, 24(4), 371–389.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Sophia, D.M. (2023, June23). Starbucks workers at over 150 stores to go on strike over Pride decor dispute. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/business/retail-consumer/starbucks-workers-over-150-stores-strike-over-pride-decor-row-2023-06-23/
    [Google Scholar]
56. Stadsarchief Rotterdam (2022, 8November). Beeldbank [Image bank]. https://hdl.handle.net/21.12133/815D48D5FAFA4BBDB6B25572E0A9AFEC
    [Google Scholar]
57. Stensaker, I.G., Balogun, J., & Langley, A. (2021). The power of the platform: Place and employee responses to organisational change. The Journal of Applied behavioural Science, 57(2), 174–203.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Taylor, A. (2024, 6February). Corporate advocacy in a time of social outrage. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2024/02/corporate-advocacy-in-a-time-of-social-outrage
    [Google Scholar]
59. Thunberg, S., & Arnell, L. (2021). Pioneering the use of technologies in qualitative research: A research review of the use of digital interviews. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 25(6), 757–768.
    [Google Scholar]
60. van der Meer, T.G.L.A., & Jonkman, J.G.F. (2021). Politicization of corporations and their environment: Corporations’ social license to operate in a polarized and mediatized society. Public Relations Review, 47(1), 101988.
    [Google Scholar]
61. van der Velden, C. (2014, March8). Vloeibare identiteit [Liquid identity]. Het Parool.
    [Google Scholar]
62. van Gelder, K. (2024, May7). Market share of the leading supermarkets in the Netherlands in 2022 [Figure]. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/589618/leading-companies-in-food-retail-netherlands/
    [Google Scholar]
63. Vredenburg, J., Kapitan, S., Spry, A., & Kemper, J.A. (2020). Brands taking a stand: Authentic brand activism or woke washing? Journal of public policy & marketing, 39(4), 444-460.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Weber, T., Joireman, J., Sprott, D.E., & Hydock, C. (2022). Differential response to corporate political advocacy and corporate social responsibility: Implications for political polarization and radicalization. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 42(1), 74–93.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Weick, K.E., Sutcliffe, K.M., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organisation Science, 16(4), 409–421.
    [Google Scholar]
66. Wowak, A.J., Busenbark, J.R., & Hambrick, D.C. (2022). How do employees react when their CEO speaks out? Intra- and extra-firm implications of CEO sociopolitical activism. Administrative Science Quarterly, 67(2), 553–593.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Yang, S.U., Kang, M., Kim, Y., & Lee, E. (2022). The effects of leadership in corporate social advocacy on positive employee outcomes. Journal of Public Relations Research, 34(6), 296–316.
    [Google Scholar]
68. Yim, M.C. (2021). Fake, faulty, and authentic stand-taking. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 15(1), 60–76.
    [Google Scholar]
69. Zhou, A. (2021). Communicating corporate LGBTQ advocacy: A computational comparison of the global CSR discourse. Public Relations Review, 47(4), 102061.
    [Google Scholar]