Zegen, vloek of grijs gebied? | Amsterdam University Press Journals Online
2004
Volume 27, Issue 1
  • E-ISSN: 1388-1302

Abstract

Abstract NL

Deze studie onderzoekt de loopbaangevolgen van de COVID-19 pandemie onder zowel klinische als niet-klinische academici in een Universitair Medisch Centrum (UMC) op basis van loopbaanshocks literatuur en het theorie. De studie is gebaseerd op een vragenlijstonderzoek onder academici, werkzaam binnen een universitair medisch centrum in mei 2021 (n = 250) en op inzichten uit verdiepende interviews met mid-career academici (n = 38) tussen september 2021 en februari 2022. De resultaten illustreren dat de COVID-19 pandemie voor het merendeel van de academici in de medische context fungeerde als een loopbaanshock omdat het hen dwong te reflecteren op loopbaaninvesteringen. De data illustreren het onderliggende samenspel aan hulpbronnen en werkeisen dat bepalend is voor de loopbaangevolgen en hoe dit vervolgens uitmondt in een heterogeniteit aan loopbaanervaringen. Een aanvullende opbrengst van de studie is dat de categorisatie van werkkenmerken als een hulpbron of een werkeis kan wisselen in een veranderende werkomgeving. Mede door deze wisseling fluctueren de loopbaangevolgen van COVID-19 over de tijd. De praktische opbrengsten van dit artikel benadrukken het belang van een langetermijnperspectief met betrekking op de loopbaangevolgen van loopbaanshocks alsook het belang van een aanpak op maat.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/THRM2024.1.001.HELD
2024-01-01
2024-02-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/13881302/27/1/THRM2024.1.001.HELD.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5117/THRM2024.1.001.HELD&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Adisa, T. A., Antonacopoulou, E., Beauregard, T. A., Dickmann, M., & Adekoya, O. D. (2022). Exploring the Impact of COVID-19 on Employees’ Boundary Management and Work–Life Balance. British Journal of Management, 33(4), 1694–1709. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12643
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Akkermans, J., Richardson, J., & Kraimer, M. L. (2020). The Covid-19 crisis as a career shock: Implications for careers and vocational behavior. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 119, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103434
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Akkermans, J., Seibert, S. E., & Mol, S. T. (2018). Tales of the unexpected: Integrating career shocks in the contemporary careers literature. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 44, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v44i0.1503
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands-resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273–285. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000056
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Sanz-Vergel, A. (2023). Job Demands-Resources Theory: Ten Years Later. In Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior (Vol. 10, Issue 1, pp. 25–53). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-org-psych-120920-053933
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bentein, K., Vandenberghe, C., Vandenberg, R., & Stinglhamber, F. (2005). The role of change in the relationship between commitment and turnover: A latent growth modeling approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(3), 468–482. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.3.468
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bol, T., Derks, B., & Poorthuis, L. (2021). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic first lockdownperiod on the work and well-being of academics in the Netherlands. https://www.dejongeakademie.nl/publicaties/2096936.aspx?t=The-impact-of-the-COVID-19-pandemic-first-lockdown-period-on-the-work-and-well-being-of-academics
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Butterick, M., & Charlwood, A. (2021). HRM and the COVID-19 pandemic: How can we stop making a bad situation worse?Human Resource Management Journal, 31(4), 847–856. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12344
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Greenhaus, J. H., & Kossek, E. E. (2014). The Contemporary Career: A WorkHome Perspective. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 361–388. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091324
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Greenhaus, J. H., Parasuraman, S., & Wormley, W. M. (1990). Effects of Race on Organizational Experiences, Job Performance Evaluations, and Career Outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 33(1), 64–86.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Hofer, A., Spurk, D., & Hirschi, A. (2020). When and why do negative organization-related career shocks impair career optimism? A conditional indirect effect model. Career Development International. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-12-2018-0299
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Kohli, M. (1986). The world we forget: A historical review of the life course. In V. W.Marshall (Ed.), Later life: The social psychology of aging (pp. 271–303). Beverly Hills: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Mayrhofer, W., & Gunz, H. (2022). From wallflower to life and soul of the party: acknowledging time’s role at center stage in the study of careers. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 0(0), 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2022.2075234
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Myers, K. R., Tham, W. Y., Yin, Y., Cohodes, N., Thursby, J. G., Thursby, M. C., Schiffer, P., Walsh, J. T., Lakhani, K. R., & Wang, D. (2020). Unequal effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on scientists. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(9), 880–883. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0921-y
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Nash, M., & Churchill, B. (2020). Caring during COVID-19: A gendered analysis of Australian university responses to managing remote working and caring responsibilities. Gender, Work and Organization, 27(5), 833–846. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12484
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Ng, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (2014). Subjective career success: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 85(2), 169–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2014.06.001
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Pak, K. (2021). De rol van grote levensgebeurtenissen bij langer doorwerken. Tijdschrift Voor HRM, 2, 22–38. https://doi.org/10.5117/THRM2021.2.PAK
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Seibert, S. E., Kraimer, M. L., Holtom, B. C., & Pierotti, A. J. (2013). Even the best laid plans sometimes go askew: Career self-management processes career shocks, and the decision to pursue graduate education. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(1), 169–182. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030882
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Timmermans, S., & Tavory, I. (2012). Theory construction in qualitative research: From grounded theory to abductive analysis. Sociological Theory, 30(3), 167–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275112457914
    [Google Scholar]
  21. van Helden, D.L., den Dulk, L., Steijn, B., Boonstra, J.G. & Vernooij, M.W. (2023A) Career authenticity in academia: examining the role of antecedents across gender and academic rank. European Journal of Higher Education, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2023.2201683
    [Google Scholar]
  22. van Helden, D.L., den Dulk, L., Steijn, B., & Vernooij, M. W. (2023). Career implications of career shocks through the lens of gender: the role of the academic career script. Career Development International, 28(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-09-2022-0266
    [Google Scholar]
  23. van Veldhoven, M., & van Gelder, M. (2020). De voor- en nadelen van verplicht thuiswerken tijdens de lockdown. Tijdschrift Voor HRM, 23(3), 66–90. https://doi.org/10.5117/thrm2020.3.veld
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Zacher, H., Rudolph, C. W., Todorovic, T., & Ammann, D. (2019). Academic career development: A review and research agenda. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 110(B), 357–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2018.08.006
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/THRM2024.1.001.HELD
Loading
/content/journals/10.5117/THRM2024.1.001.HELD
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error