2004
Volume 137, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 0040-7550
  • E-ISSN: 2212-0521

Abstract

Abstract

The beginning is a foundational element in literary fiction: it is the entrance into a textual world. In this article, I analyse the genesis of the first chapter of Gie Bogaert’s born-digital novel (2016), which was logged with the keystroke logging software Inputlog. The beginning of supplies important information for the understanding of the textual world, takes on a key role in the ‘recentering’ of the reader to this world, and facilitates an immersive reading experience through the use of the second-person singular, and through making an appeal to the readers’ sensory and spatial imagination. Focusing on the textual development, I ask the question how four important aspects of the novel were implemented in the first chapter during the writing process. I will demonstrate how Bogaert experimented with explicating these aspects, but later decided to refer to them rather implicitly. Overall, this analysis demonstrates how Inputlog, in case it is used by literary authors, may facilitate textual genetic research on present-day works of literature.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/TNTL2021.2.002.BEKI
2021-01-01
2021-10-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bernaerts, Van Hulle & Martens2011 – L.Bernaerts, D.Van Hulle & G.Martens, ‘Narratologie en tekstgenese. Een terreinverkenning’. In: Spiegel der Letteren53 (2011) 3, p. 281-309.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bogaert2016 – G.Bogaert, Roosevelt. Amsterdam: De Bezige Bij, 2016.
  3. Boie & Ferrer1993 – B.Boie & D.Ferrer, Genèses du roman contemporain: Incipit et entrée en écriture. Paris: CNRS Editions, 1993.
  4. Buschenhenke2016 – F.Buschenhenke, ‘Het literaire werk anno 2016. Digitale schrijfprocessen vastleggen en analyseren’. In: Vooys34 (2016) 4, p. 8-20.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. De Biasi1996 – P.M.De Biasi, ‘What is a Literary Draft? Toward a Functional Typology of Genetic Documentation’. In: Yale French Studies89 (1996), p. 26-58.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Del Lungo2003 – A.Del Lungo, L’incipit Romanesque. Paris: Editions du Seuil, 2003.
  7. Del Lungo2010 – A.Del Lungo (ed.), Le début et la fin du récit: une relation critique. Paris: Classiques Garnier, 2010.
  8. Deppman, Ferrer & Groden – J.Deppman, D.Ferrer & M.Groden (eds.), Genetic Criticism. Texts and Avant-textes. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2004.
  9. Hentea2010 – M.Hentea, ‘The Forms and Functions of Back Story in the Novel’. In: Narrative18 (2010) 3, p. 347-366.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Kirschenbaum e.a. 2009 – M.Kirschenbaum e.a., ‘Digital Materiality: Preserving Access to Computers as Complete Environments’. In: UC Office of the President: California Digital Library (2009) p. 105-112; https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7d3465vg, geraadpleegd op 12januari2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Kirschenbaum2016 – M.Kirschenbaum, Track Changes: A Literary History of Word Processing. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press, 2016.
  12. Leander2018 – N.B.Leander, The Sense of a Beginning: Theory of the Literary Opening. Kopenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press, 2018.
  13. Leijten & Van Waes2013 – M.Leijten & L.Van Waes, ‘Keystroke Logging in Writing Research: Using Inputlog to Analyze Writing Processes’. In: Written Communication30 (2013) 3, p. 358-392.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Mathijsen2009 – M.Mathijsen, ‘Genetic textual editing: the end of an era’. In: Was ist Textkritik? Zur Geschichte und Relevanz eines Zentralbegriffs der Editionswissenschaft. Beihefte zu Editio 28. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 2009, p. 233-240.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Nuttall1992 – A.D.Nuttall, Openings: narrative beginnings from the epic to the novel. Oxford: Clarendon, 1992.
  16. Phelan2008 – J.Phelan, ‘The Beginning of Beloved. A Rhetorical Approach’. In: B.Richardson (ed.), Narrative Beginnings: Theories and Practices. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2008, p. 195-212.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Richardson2008 – B.Richardson (ed.), Narrative Beginnings: Theories and Practices. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2008.
  18. Ries2018 – T.Ries, ‘The Rationale of the Born-Digital Dossier Génétique: Digital Forensics and the Writing Process: With Examples from the Thomas Kling Archive’. In: Digital Scholarship in the Humanities33 (2018) 2, p. 391-424.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Romagnolo2015 – C.Romagnolo (ed.), Opening Acts: Narrative Beginnings in Twentieth-Century Feminist Fiction, Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2015.
  20. Ryan2001 – M.Ryan, Narrative as virtual reality: immersion and interactivity in literature and electronic media. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2001.
  21. Ryan1991 – M.Ryan, ‘Possible Worlds and Accessibility Relations: A Semantic Typology of Fiction’. In: Poetics Today12 (1991) 3, p. 553-576.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Sternberg1978 – M.Sternberg, Expositional modes and temporal ordering in fiction. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1978.
  23. Van Hulle2016 – D.Van Hulle, ‘Modelling a Digital Scholarly Edition for Genetic Criticism: A Rapprochement’. In: Variants12-13 (2016), p. 34-56.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Van Hulle2019 – D.Van Hulle, ‘De logica van de tekstversie in digitaal geschreven literatuur’. In: Tijdschrift voor Nederlandse Taal- en Letterkunde135 (2019) 4, p. 465-477.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Vásári2019 – M.Vásári, ‘Securing the Literary Evidence. Some Perspectives on Digital Forensics’. In: P.Kelemen & N.Pethes (eds.), Philology in the Making. Analog/Digital Cultures of Scholarly Writing and Reading. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag, 2019, p. 287-309.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Vauthier2016 – B.Vauthier, ‘Genetic Criticism Put to the Test by Digital Technology: Sounding out the (mainly) Digital Genetic File of El Dorado by Robert Juan-Cantavella’. In: Variants12-13 (2016), p. 163-186.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/TNTL2021.2.002.BEKI
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error